this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
458 points (96.5% liked)
Political Weirdos
1335 readers
438 users here now
A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.
- Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
- Follow Iemmy.world TOS
- Don’t be a jerk
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He had to watch his daughter die right in front of him, because he fumbled a weapon that was supposed to keep them safe. Idk how anyone can see that as inconsequential.
The state isn't pursuing criminal penalties for his gross negligence. But that's wildly different from how the story is being pitched - a guy gunning down his daughter in cold blood and escaping a criminal verdict because MAGA voters are above the law.
Will somebody please think of the poor dad who was drunk who fired the gun that killed his young adult daughter, who has a boyfriend, a future, a life of opportunities cut short?
You don't point a gun at something you don't intend to kill. That's firearms safety lesson one.
Pointing a gun alone is intent.
Do you believe in accidental deaths via firearms? Or are all firearm deaths intentional?
Edit: this is not snark but an honest question.
I don't believe this death was unpreventable. Whether he only intended to brandish the gun and his finger slipped or if he intentionally murdered her is immaterial in the face that there's no charges, not even manslaughter is appalling.
Agreed with all of that. Im not making any statement about how warranted or unwarranted his criminal charge, or lack of charge was.
Im just especially interested in the notion that pointing a gun at someone means there is intent to kill, regardless of circumstances. That seems weird. It seems like it would logically follow that all gun deaths have intent.
Edit: after doing some research, it appears intent to kill and criminal intent is the distinction. Legally, pointing a gun means there is criminal intent. However, pointing a gun alone does not imply intent to kill, at least not legally. I may have muddled the waters by not asking OP to clarify what type of intent they meant. I assumed intent to kill.
If I bring out a knife and kill you with it but only because I tripped while holding it at your throat, did I intend to kill you or not? Does it matter?
Yes, that absolutely matters as the jury decides whether it is murder or manslaughter.
Ideally, yes. In this case there was no trial for the jury to make such a determination.
No. It doesn't.
If someone pulled out a gun, points it at someone, pulls the trigger and shoots; could they argue that they'd hoped they'd either not hit them or not hit something vital? and so they didn't intend to kill them?
You pull out a knife and brandish it threateningly: That sets up intent. We do not know the mind nor will we ever; therefore we can not use the basis of the mind for the inference of intent. We have to rely on actions which could be reasonably interpreted as intent.
Am I misunderstanding or is this completely wrong?
https://www.vbrownleelaw.com/the-role-of-intent-and-premeditation-in-homicide-cases/
Yes, and it has been done successfully.
https://www.studicata.com/summaries/superior-court-of-pennsylvania/commonwealth-v-predmore-2018-so9l74/
Does the jury use it's psychic empathy to determine what was in my heart at the time the knife perforated your larynx or do they use the circumstances leading up to the murder to determine if I had intent to kill you or not?
Weirdly gruesome. Disengage.
Replying isn't disengagement. I used the knife as an example because it makes it clear that putting someone in immediate danger with no concern for their safety is a kind of "intent". If I juggled the knives near you instead would the humorous contrast make the analogy more palatable? Im just an amateur knife juggler, playing with his knives in your personal space after we had an argument, no hostile intent here.
Pointing a real firearm at a person should always be treated as if the holder wants to kill a person. There are exceptions, none of them apply here.
Agreed, that's a good rule to stay safe, but that's not what the law says.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-it-a-crime-to-point-a-gun-at-someone/
Im sure I'd agree if i read it, but I'm ignorant to the details of this story. I am solely interested in the claim that pointing a gun means intent.
Pretty sure they don't have laws in Texas at this point.
As a firearms owner I can unequivocally say that guns don't shoot themselves. "Accidental" firearm deaths are all preventable. Idiots, like the person in this article that should be in jail awaiting trial for murder, should not own guns.
Because if he wanted to kill her then that's not a consequence, it's a reward. If only there was some sort of trial in which evidence could be presented to an impartial judge...
Maybe show off the gun with no ammunition in it and the safety on. Not loaded with the safety off.
I'm not going to show off new kitchen knives to a friend by swinging them wildly around the house.
He should 100% be charged with criminal negligence causing death. He should 100% spend time in prison. Whether the tweet is a lie or not, and your claim is true, he killed his daughter because he was a negligent fucking moron.
No. Homicide at the least. You can't argue to me that pointing a gun does not infer intent, or at least, I'd be willing to make that argument. If I were a prosecutor I'd find out what gun safety classes this guy had gone through and I can almost guarantee, if they'd been through any, the first thing they were taught was to not fire a gun at anything you do not intend to kill.
Pointing a gun at someone or something shows intent. It's not like he had it reasonably secured in. A holster and it misfired.
He picked up the gun, he pointed the gun.
Now we have intent.
Whatever happens after that is his fault.
I don't disagree with anything you said. I just haven't seen anything that says he deliberately pointed it at her.
Is there a way to accidentally pick up a gun and point it at someone? Just playing the part of prosecutor.
Sitting next to her holding the gun on your lap and it goes off? I still haven't seen anything about deliberately pointing it.
Absolutely not trying to defend anything thus guy did. He killed his daughter. He did so because of his own negligence. But like I said before I haven't seen anything about deliberation pointing it at her.
Elsewhere in this post someone mentions that the Glock the father was using does not come with a safety, surprisingly this is not apparently mandated by law on firearms.
It's just not consequential enough to avoid jail time imo. There's also the fact that anyone could shoot someone and claim it as an accident if no witnesses are present.
I agree that the picture doesn't tell the whole story though.
Her husband was in the house when it happened, along with the rest of her immediate family.
They weren't in the room but It honestly makes him look even more guilty.
His story is a bit silly. "Just had a huge fight with my daughter, she's about to leave. :( . Guess I'll show her my gun"