this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
287 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

6027 readers
1610 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
287
AIs can generate near-verbatim copies of novels from training data (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AI and legal experts told the FT this “memorization” ability could have serious ramifications on AI groups’ battle against dozens of copyright lawsuits around the world, as it undermines their core defense that LLMs “learn” from copyrighted works but do not store copies.

Sam Altman would like to remind you each Old Lady at a Library consume 284 cubic feet of Oxygen a day from the air.

Also, hey at least they made sure to probably destroy the physical copy they ripped into their hopelessly fragmented CorpoNapster fever dream, the law is the law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That's a interesting question. Think of the Star Trek holodeck. If someone creates a perfect holodeck recreation of their own partner, and sleeps with that simulation, is that cheating on their partner? Let's assume it's not one of those fancy sentient holograms like the doctor, just a regular mindless one.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what if they are the doctor and have sex with a ghost?

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's just a good old Blazin' time

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I prefer Blazin' with Bev'

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Bev is implied when one is already Blazin'

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eh I would say it's masturbating to a "picture" of their partner. It's just a sexy light show. As long as it's not sentient it can never have feelings back so it's just a sex toy. Ever hear of a clone-a-willy?

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

As with a picture, the important part is consent. Was the picture/3D model created with informed consent from the partner that it might reasonably be used for masturbation? If so, then not cheating. Otherwise it is.