this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
1341 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

6262 readers
1041 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ForestGreenGhost@literature.cafe 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes that is sort of true. But do you know why what you said was a false equivalence and why claiming freedom of speech doesn't make sense?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ForestGreenGhost@literature.cafe 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Never believe that ~~anti-Semites~~ people like this guy are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The ~~anti-Semites~~ people like this guy have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."

Jean-Paul Sartre

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People who lack arguments cite random quotes

Me

[–] ForestGreenGhost@literature.cafe 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I asked you: "But do you know why what you said was a false equivalence and why claiming freedom of speech doesn’t make sense?"

That's two questions and you answered with "it does." Which doesn't answer either of them. Until you answer those questions then the quote I posted wasn't random, in fact, it calls out exactly what you're doing.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It does (answer the question).

[–] ForestGreenGhost@literature.cafe 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

You claimed it doesn't make sense. I say "it does".