this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
88 points (91.5% liked)

Death to NATO

1606 readers
3 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You just gotta love how US military say everything openly and in their reports. In particular, it has a forecast of US casualties and mobilization reserves in a conflict of this level.

Thesis:

  • military doctors project a [KIA and WIA] casualty rate for the US Armed Forces of 3,600\day.
  • The combat replenishment rate is 25% or 800 troops per day.
  • In 20 years of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. has lost about 50,000 people.

In a conflict of the Ukrainian level, the U.S. would suffer such losses in 2 weeks.

  • The recruitment shortage is a major problem.
  • every soldier not recruited today is a strategic mobility asset [IRR or reservists] that the US will not have in 2031**
  • IRR was 700K in 1973, 450K in 1994, now at 76K.
  • These numbers will not make up for the projected losses.
  • the 70's concept of contract forces is outdated and does not fit the current operational environment.
  • The needs of the U.S. Armed Forces for a Ukrainian-level war require a transition to conscription.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NothingButBits@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Why has recruitment dropped so much? I can understand Americans being reluctant to join the CIA, FBI and NSA. But the US army is still revered by many, and it has many perks.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 48 points 2 years ago (1 children)

War on Terror. Military and its benefits wascab easier sell pre 2001. Get money for college, learn a trade, see the world - its peace time, and because of The End of History there's never going beva real war. 9/11 caused a bump in blood and soil reaction requirement, but 20 years of getting shot at inbthe desert for no reason, 20 years of people you know coming back and being disabled or psychologically scarred or commiting suicide, 20 years of the gov not taking care of veterans from your commity that you know. All that eats away at that veneration - whether people express it that way or not.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not to mention the monumental "Nothing" achieved by the vast majority of the war on terror (besides enriching the MIC, but that doesn't get trumpeted).

[–] Beat_da_Rich@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Americans across the entire political spectrum understand the War on Terror as an immense criminal act based on lies. Even those that still have an overall positive view of military personnel. It cannot be overstated just how much of a catastrophe that was -- obviously for the innocents -- but also for the military itself.

Most Americans may still be indoctrinated with various forms of shitlibbery but the US military has lost trust for generations. I don't think the US will ever be able to mobilize the meat fodder needed for a great power conflict without a draft and a draft would start a civil war. That's why these ghouls have to rely on vassals and PMCs now.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A draft wouldn't start a civil war, but it would be a speedrun of the public's response to the Vietnam War, including a disintegration of the Army's ability to fight and direct action against recruiting efforts. We'd likely see much more support for that direct action, too.

[–] kig_v2@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Unironically a draft would be the best opportunity for American MLs possible, short of federal bombing of American cities

[–] juchebot88@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anecdotally: I've run into a fair amount of veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who are very vocal in their opinion that nobody should join the military right now. This isn't necessarily because they oppose US imperialism; some veterans do oppose it, but they've often ovecorrected and become extreme pacifists and Leo Tolstoy types. Most of the anti-military veterans I've met are actually rather proud of their "service," but they think the military is corrupt, the wars are unwinnable, and the common enlisted man is treated like shit. A former special forces guy I sort of know peripherally told me once, matter-of-factly, at a gathering we were both at: "in the the military, an attractive woman knows exactly the amount of value she has." Voices like these carry a lot of weight in the small towns and rural areas from which recruits are largely drawn.

[–] Farman@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What does that mean? Is that an euphemism for rape?

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Or prostitution. Or getting positions for sexual favours.

[–] juchebot88@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep, pretty much. Or prostitution in one form or another, like REEEEvolution said below.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They have extreme enlistment requirements. For example, if you have ADHD, Autism, or depression in any form, even if you have treatment or are completely the same as a nuerotypical person, you are still barred entry.

Same goes for any form of drug use. A whole list of genetic or physical issues, and so on. They’ve limited their pool significantly.

[–] olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

depression and drug use, physical issues

lmao, so basically no usian can make in, psychological problems are sky rocketing because of shit living conditions + fentanyl addicts + people with diseases from low quality food like high blood pressure or diabetes.

speaking serious now, i fucking bet that in case a war breaks out, they will lift these restrictions immediately and send the "undesirables" to die, with the exception of prisoners jails are private and having people release could result in profit loss.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

They’ve already done that.

Look up “McNamara’s Morons”. The US lifted those restrictions during the Vietnam war, and those units had a casualty rate of nearly 3 times that of standard units.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

MacNamara’s Morons

Every time i get to know something new about USA, it's yet another marg bar moment.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It just keeps getting better and better doesn’t it?

[–] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

And I'm still wondering how could there be people who know these things, who know about Tuskegee trials, MOVE bombing, fuckin Bonus Army - and still cheer for USA, or at least "liberal democracy". But nope, somehow in their mind USSR is still worse

[–] olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

didn't knew that, thanks comrade

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago

You're welcome! Happy to help!

[–] Dessa@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Holy shit, I never expected there ti be an actual RL explanation for Forrest Gump and Bubba

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Yep, they were part of Project 100,000, if you also notice during those scenes, the other men in their platoon have some physical disabilities, alcoholism, poor eyesight, under/overweight, and other “McNamara” traits.

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

exception of prisoners jails are private and having people release could result in profit loss

not if you pay the prisons to recruit prisoners.

someone please take the lathe away from me

[–] olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

selling prisoners would hurt profits in the long run, but that is a problem for tomorrow capitalists, today we profit selling people

these are all issues with how they structure the payment which is very workable

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Oh but it's all about that short term gains!

And if they start running out of bodies to fill prison bunks, they just gotta start booking them younger.

[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

no ADHD? how does anything get (half) done in the army?

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, technically you can have ADHD, you just can't have any stimulants or treatment.

Which is a bit ironic given the fact that almost all modern day soldiers in all armies are issued a massive emergency dose of stimulants as part of their combat gear.