134
submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] prowess2956@kbin.social 145 points 8 months ago

But it's okay for a pillow salesman to be involved in politics?

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 84 points 8 months ago

What about kid rock? If you can call him a musician....

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What about a reality TV celebrity like, oh I don't know, Donald Trump?

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 26 points 8 months ago

A movie star, like Raygun?

[-] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

A bodybuilder, like Arnold?

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

Tbf the Governator was actually half decent.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

A comedian, like Al Franken?

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

A wrestler, like Jesse Ventura?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 125 points 8 months ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

And to this day she has yet to say anything pro democrat or pro-republican. That's the funniest part.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 110 points 8 months ago

Well, telling people to vote is pretty anti-conservative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rifugee@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Also, the Chiefs are partly owned and ran by a guy that has made several donations to the Republican party. Not a lot of money over all, but consistently Republican.

I wish the Democratic party was as competent as these nutjobs think they are. I imagine the country would be in a much better place.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I believe the Chiefs are owned by one of the oldest families in football (Hunts). They were well-regarded generally (as good for football), but I would imagine the generational owners lean to the right as they are protecting family fortunes from the rabble.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

What's funny is that she hasn't endorsed anyone. But they keep raising such a stink on the mere thought that she might endorse Biden and have demanded that she doesn't voice her Biden endorsement far and wide to the point, now, it has become assumed by most that she does endorse him. If anyone does, in fact, give a damn about her endorsement, the wackos yelling on the right have made her de facto position a pro-Biden position. Exactly what they're complaining about. Now she doesn't even need to endorse him in order to basically endorse him. Dolts.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago

She’s been speaking out against the Supreme Court killing Roe, and she’s shown that she can drive registration with young woman. And young women are swing left of center.

She doesn’t have to endorse anyone to terrify the right.

[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Your ideology is total shit when the mere suggestion that citizens should vote as they please is a threat to your existence. The GOP's days are numbered.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Unless they get away with suppressing the vote. Which they’ve been very successful at.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

she hasn't endorsed anyone.

Well, she did endorse Biden in 2020. Don't see why she would have changed her mind one bit in 2024.>

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

Wait until the swifties think she is in danger.

[-] ysjet@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Let's be real, with as bat shit crazy as these cultists are, she probably is.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 18 points 8 months ago

MAGAts vs. Swifties 2024, I'd pay to watch that.

Start making the popcorn because it seems to me like that's where this is heading.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

Something something Streisand effect?

[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Why? Just because Fox News doesn’t broadcast anything vaguely affiliated with real world politics doesn’t mean others can’t talk about it.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Conservatives say they think musicians should stay out of politics. The same conservatives celebrate Kid Rock, Ted Nugent, Trace Adkins and any other piece of shit who loudly encourages their audience to vote for a seditious rapist.

It's almost like conservatives are just liars who are fully incapable of honesty on any topic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 23 points 8 months ago

That's rich coming from the network that's been fellating a reality tv star 24/7 for 8 years.

[-] MoogleMaestro@kbin.social 20 points 8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure I understand the republican strategy around Taylor Swift.

Like, doesn't harassing her for basically no reason only increase the likelihood that she does get involved in political battles, not reduce?

This just seems like another hair-brained, half thought through plan.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Nobody ever accused Republicans of being smart

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

[-] BlackPit@feddit.ch 16 points 8 months ago

Leave...Taylor...ALONE! :p

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Taylor Swift is grabbing conservatives by their collective pussies and they don’t like it.

[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah. Look what it did to Fox News. Turned them from a sack of shit to a treasonous sack of shit.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Fox claims they themselves are just an entertainment network, not news. Shouldn't they stay out of politics just like they want her to?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pedestrian@links.hackliberty.org 10 points 8 months ago

This article discusses reactions from some Fox News commentators to the possibility of Taylor Swift endorsing President Biden in the 2024 election. Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, and others on Fox News urged Swift not to get involved in politics. Some speculated that Swift's relationship with Travis Kelce was engineered by Democrats. Hannity drew a connection between Swift and George Soros, noting Soros' son helped fund the sale of Swift's song catalog. However, not all at Fox News were negative - sports analyst Jay Glazer praised Swift as a "genius" and saw nothing problematic about her or the NFL. In summary, several Fox News personalities strongly discouraged Swift from supporting Biden, while at least one commentator admired her musical talents.

[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

They're all entertainers. I don't see the difference except Taylor Swift has a day job.

[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Taylor Swift will be 35 years old before the inauguration. There is still time to sub her in as vice president.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But hey, let’s ask Kid Rock what he thinks about national debt

Fuck republicunts

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Says the channel that is the de facto D-List celebrity to deranged right wing pundit pipeline

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

I don't know which is worse - Fox telling an artist to not be political or the NYT reporting that Fox is telling an artist not to be political.

I'm very, very tired of the news being the news. It's no longer about reporting events and ideas but generating content and ad revenue. We've been the frog in the pot for a while now. How much worse is it going to get?

[-] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I want to hear the arguments between swifty kids, and their shitty fox news parents.

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In fact, we should just get rid of news outlets (Fox, NBC) entirely and only allow news agencies (AP News, Reuters) to report on news and politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Has she said or done anything? Or are they just afraid she might?

[-] Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

She baked a blue cookie one time or some shit.

Generally, she just encourages her fans to vote, and Republicans know young women don't want anything to with them. They really just want to make it so uncomfortable for Swift to say anything, so they're bringing a preemptive firestorm and hoping she keeps her head down this election season.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Right-wing activists have indulged in baseless speculation that Ms. Swift’s romance with the Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce — a kind of ur-American couple of football star and wholesome pop icon — is a contrivance engineered by Democrats, or perhaps the National Football League, to trick unsuspecting Americans into boosting Super Bowl ratings or voting for Mr. Biden in November.

Swift flies on a private plane, “yet she constantly talks about climate change.” It was the sort of eco-scolding that rarely turns up on a cable network whose guests often voice skepticism about global warming.

Swift said that Mr. Soros’s son, Alex, helped fund the sale of her song catalog to the producer Scooter Braun.

Another “Hannity” guest, the Fox News contributor Charlie Hurt, told viewers not to dismiss the bizarre conspiracies about Ms.

“Republicans haven’t won the Popular Vote in 20 years so now we’re trying the novel strategy of attacking one of the most beloved pop stars on the planet & … the NFL,” Alyssa Farah Griffin, a former Trump administration official and a co-host of “The View,” wrote on X.

On Brian Kilmeade’s Saturday show, he asked the Fox Sports analyst Jay Glazer about the Swift phenomenon.


The original article contains 811 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
134 points (91.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS