64
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml to c/latestageusempire@lemmygrad.ml
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 6 months ago

Manlets... rise up.

Lenin was 5'5".

Stalin? 5'3"-5'6".

Robespierre? 5'3".

Toussaint Louverture? 5'4"!

Revolution runs in our tiny little veins, comrades. Our strides may be small, but our hearts and minds are enormous. 🫡

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Castro was 6’ 3,

Mandela was 6’ 1

Fred Hampton was 5’ 10

Rokossovsky was 6’ 6

The Revolution comes in all shapes and sizes comrades. Size matters not. We will march together!

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

Jesus I had no idea Castro was that tall

[-] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 months ago

(I'm like 5'7". I am the Height Collaborator.)

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 months ago

I'm 5'7" in a good pair of walking shoes.

[-] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm about to get some Doc Martens again, I think. Not for the height boost, just cuz they're punk as hell 😎

oh and my current shoes are full of holes lol

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nelson Mandela was not 6'4, at least not when he was older. Maybe when he was younger he was that tall. If I had to guess, I'd say around 185cm/ 6'1.

Source: stood next to a "life size" Nelson Mandela statue. I was the same height

Edit: Okay I decided to google it, and according to the Nelson Mandela Foundation's website, he was 184cm tall. Close enough guess from me, turns out the statue really was life size.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 months ago

My mistake, he was listed at 6 foot 1/4 inch, and I accidentally misconstrued that as 6 foot 4.

[-] VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Best comment ever 😎!!

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago

rich people eat better during development

we gotta nail some titanium spikes into spines to get richer people

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago

It can be influenced both by the fact that tall people tend to be promoted more and by the fact that kids of richer people eat better and grow taller as a result and that they partially inherit their parents' socioeconomic status.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Damn, no wonder I'm so short. I'm poor as fuck. Going to need to get some cash so I can reach stuff on the top shelf.

[-] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 6 months ago

the capitalists don't want you to know this, but using a ladder is more stable than standing on a pile of money (!!)

[-] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 6 months ago

Don't listen to this, it's just communist propaganda!

Get some poors to tape the money together and attach them to the bottom of your boots. True capitalists wear money stilts and they are taller than commie ladders!

[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 6 months ago

Maybe I should put my height on my resume

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 months ago

Are you telling me the grad is not adding the 1.3% for height?

[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 6 months ago

The others are yet to ask how tall I am

[-] zifnab25@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

Inflation is when everyone gets taller

[-] leo_da_vinci@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 6 months ago

Note that this is about the association between height and income. It is possible that a confuser variable or set of variables is/are influencing both income and height, thus producing the observed correlation between income and height. In this case, the association would not imply causation. But even if this is just association and not causation, its a significant fact, because then there is some unkown set of factors making taller individuals having higher probabilities of earn more.

[-] androidul@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Procrustes intensify

[-] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago

Eating better food, breathing less pollutants, and experiencing less stress make you taller

[-] Omegamint@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

From what I understand a lot of it is actually epigenetics and has to do with your parents or grandparents experiencing food scarcity in their lives, which may also explain the wealth disparity stat considering generational wealth being passed on and whatnot

[-] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago

yeah, epigenetics too. Basically the stuff I said but for your parents/grandparents as well

[-] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

It does explain why countries experiencing more malnutrition tend to be poorer and shorter. Guatemalans are a good example of this. Our height demographics are skewed by the rural poor who are famously around 5 feet at the maximum height. People in the cities tend to be closer to five foot nine.

[-] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 months ago

Shorter people tend to live longer though and have fewer cardiovascular disease risks as well as cancer.

[-] VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Do you have a source for this?

[-] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago

See any 9ft people walking around?

edgeworth-shrug

[-] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago

It's primarily because they have lower blood pressure in general which leads to less risk to cardiovascular disease. Shorter body takes less pressure to pump blood to the head. The cancer thing is because smaller bodies have fewer cells. Fewer cells, less of a chance one of them malfunctions and turns into cancer.

[-] VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

I see, but do you have a source that I can share?

[-] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

Is this adjusted for gender and race?

[-] rjthyen@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Is professional sports prominent enough to be a major contributor to the difference? The NBA is an obvious one, but the NFL average height is around 6'2" I think

[-] Farvana@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago

No, the number of professional athletes (paid above this amount) is tiny compared to the population

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

Fake news, I'm as tall as I am poor.

[-] NothingButBits@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 6 months ago

wow, such meritocracy.

[-] ma1w4re@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

Welp, seems like im an exception to this rule. 197 cm tall, 0 income.

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago
[-] FlightSimEnjoyer@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago

Being richer means eating better, which means growing taller. Maybe it isn't height that gets you income, but the opposite.

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

That’s certainly one strong explanation (makes sense to me), but we can’t conclusively say if one causes the other. All we know is that there’s a correlation between height and income. All other conclusions made require additional assumptions.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

So you show your inches at the first interview or is it more of an annual review type of situation?

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago
[-] VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Damn, that is cold hearted coming from the goddess of virginity, hearth, family and home. That comment didn’t feel homely at all Hestia!

[-] rigor@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

This is the paper the article and graphic are based on:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230555

It's using a survey from mainland China.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

Late Stage Anglo-American Empire

140 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS