2114
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] user224 344 points 1 year ago

A highly compatible design with no ads, unnecessary images, videos, animations, scripts that goes straight to point delivering you exactly the information you need and nothing else? Something that's easily accessible even with old feature phones allowing older people to get information easily?
Simply something that loads instantly and just works?

Who would want that?

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 138 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Found the backend dev. "CUT THIS AESTHETICS NONSENSE! GIMME THE VARIABLE CONTENTS ALREADY! WE'RE 3.54 NANOSECONDS BEHIND!"

[-] Dasnap@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

Frontend: "Come on, this needs at least some flair. This isn't the 90s."

Throws React at it

[-] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

React ugh, everybody is using NextJs these da- ....oh, what's that? We've moved on already?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 144 points 1 year ago

The page at the top looks perfectly fine. It's useful, it gets the job done and it's lightweight.

[-] CanadaPlus 23 points 1 year ago

You sound like a backend developer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

It's almost fine. It needs to include units for the measurements.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 124 points 1 year ago

Good, that we have specialists for both and nobody is advocating that everyone should be doing full-stack work... oh wait.

[-] Venator@kbin.social 60 points 1 year ago

As a full stack developer I can assure you I can easily produce the result displayed in both those panels in the image 😏

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Full-stack development and devops: When you need an entire IT department but only want to pay for one person.

[-] lockhart@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

"Full-stack" is just a term invented by stingy employers who try to get 2 for the price of 1

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vera@lemm.ee 120 points 1 year ago

what is wrong with this frontend? not enough ads? loads too quickly?

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I would hire you as my lawyer.

[-] KeefChief12@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MentalFS@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

No cookie banner with the worst dark patterns of UX imaginable

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 107 points 1 year ago
[-] some_guy 14 points 1 year ago

motherfucking website

One of my all time faves!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DharkStare@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

As a backend developer who occasionally has to work on the frontend, that top image is pretty accurate although it requires bootstrap smeared all over to pretty things up a bit. After that it will have the "Good Enough" seal of approval.

[-] glorious_albus@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago

God I wish weather pages were more like that first one.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 44 points 1 year ago

I like to use this one: https://wttr.in/

You can get info for a specific city by appending it like this: https://wttr.in/newyork

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] suodrazah@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

in Paris

in Paris

in Paris

in Paris

What is this bloat? Trash site.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Honestly you don't even need to make the text field visible. If they can't touch-type that's on them.

[-] suodrazah@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I would prefer a dropdown list of all possible coordinate combinations.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Pfft just go there and feel the air yourself. Knowing the weather in advance is bloat anyway. If medieval sailors could launch ships without weather info and survive 30% of the time, you can too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 40 points 1 year ago

I can make HTML look alright if I have to and it's simple enough requirements.

The real hell is making it look good in an email. Oh, you used something from the last 20 years of HTML/CSS progress? Well fuck you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 31 points 1 year ago

Looks like a perfectly fine frontend to me.

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

After some time toying with CSS I have decided to fuck it and whenever I need to make a website I will just either:

  • Make a plain website with no virtually no styling.
  • Use bootstrap or some other similar shit.
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] muix@infosec.pub 20 points 1 year ago
[-] nxfsi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

No bloat, no Javashit, no problem

[-] n3cr0@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

From my experience, devs be like:

Backend, yay! Frontend, nay! ... and I the end, not even the backend works properly.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

So in the end, it doesn't even matter?

[-] CoolBeance@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
2114 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32615 readers
61 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS