this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
259 points (96.4% liked)

News

29509 readers
1862 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York appeals court has given Donald Trump 10 more days to post his bond as he appeals the civil fraud judgment against him and cut the amount necessary to $175 million.

It’s a major lifeline for the former president, who, along with his adult sons and his company, were fined more than $464 million, including interest, after Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump and his co-defendants fraudulently inflated the value of his assets.

The ruling staves off the prospect, for now, of New York Attorney General Letitia James seeking to seize the former president’s property to enforce the judgment against him. Trump had been struggling to come up with the means to post a bond of more than $500 million, the total that he would have needed before Monday’s appellate decision.

The ruling stated that the $175 million bond will be in place until at least September, meaning James won’t be able to seek to enforce the judgment against Trump until then.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 205 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why does Broke Don keep getting special treatment?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because he's white, rich, and connected. We have no justice in America.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently Don Poorleone is *not rich

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's rich enough to do what he wants. The poverty act is so he can dodge paying what he owes.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He’s less rich and more just connected to Putin’s teat— he’s a leveraged middle man.

His ass belongs to Russia

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering Russia posted the bond for his rape appeal, I'm inclined to agree with you. But by US court standards, being rich and having rich people bail you out is the same thing.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just ask Clarence Thomas

He also appointed a lot of friendly judges.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Porque no los dos

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 154 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And he has 10 more days, at which point it's likely to get moved back again.

If Trump had a couple ounces of pot he'd have been in jail this whole time.

Our justice system is fucked and neither party want to actually hold the rich accountable. Because the people who can do anything are rich.

We need to stop acting like some of these wealthy assholes have the average Americans best interest at heart.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a disappointment. And people wonder why US citizens keep losing trust in the state.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to start voting for a better government en masse

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Indeed. And STAT!

[–] computabloke@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did some further reading on this.

Trump is appealing the James ruling. While the appeal is under review, he was still required to pay the penalty amount as a bond to stave off the possibility of the state seizing his assets.

While the bond amount has been reduced to $US175 million. The full penalty still stands if his appeal against the ruling fails!

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but it's Don so his appeal will succeed anyways because fuck me

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Entirely expected once you understand that we're all living in capitalist oligarchies masquerading as "democracies".

Our politics. Our rule of law. Our national security. All of it is structured around the profit motive of capitalism, and all of it is designed to benefit the highest bidder(s).

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

US “courts” are the laughingstock of the world. 😡

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 34 points 1 year ago

I was expecting some kind of last-minute shenanigans like this. Oh well. It’s still been fun watching him absolutely lose his shit over the last few days.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anybody willing to bet he can't make the smaller amount either?

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Only in Rubles

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't he brag he had all the money in cash?

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only if you can be white and rich and male, “Justice” system will let you do anything and get away with it.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Do you have examples of poor hispanic women that didn't get their bond reduced in this fashion?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

What the fuck?

[–] antihumanitarian@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not really special treatment. Generally, it's understood that the defendant will use a bond company and put up a fraction of the cash. They are trying to balance the defendants appeal rights with not postponing the judgement forever. He's actually tying up significantly more money this way than he would with a bond.

The actual judgement, should he lose appeal, isn't reduced.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The actual judgement, should he lose appeal, isn't reduced.

That's a very important take-away.

Though it is still frustrating that he's managed to delay the entire process yet again.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes because if he delays it till he’s president he’ll just ignore it.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That's a big part of his game plan for all of the legal actions he is facing.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

2 days ago he claimed publicly he had 500 millions cash.... Why cut him a break when, by his own statement, he can pay his own bond or back it up?

This is nothing but special treatment.... Bear in mind they also loosened a ton of other conditions: grifter kids don't have to pay their $5 million bonds either, they can continue to first in NY until appeal , etc... none of those have anything to do with your justification for lowering the bond

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I wonder how the Trump fanboys are going to spin this advantagous decision as if the government is out to get him.

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Our judicial system is designed to be weak against the wealthy, here's a clear example. They'd never give someone poor such a break.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always try to see the court's side on these things. INAL, and most times we get a warped story from the headlines.

I am seeing nothing here. What exactly was the legal excuse?

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They literally gave none

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great, with that timing, should Letitia James go after his properties in Seotember, that will only help him drive supporters to the ballot box with the election so soon after.

[–] jmanes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His supporters would end up at the ballot box either way. They are dedicated to the brand.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The major supporters sure, but that timing could help push people that are still on the fence towards Trump.

Republicans as a whole are better at going to vote than Democrats are, especially so in red states. We don't need more events scheduled to further rally and anger the right a few weeks before the election. There was already too much violence after the 2020 election.