330
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money trial ordered the media on Thursday not to report on where potential jurors have worked and to be careful about revealing information about those who will sit in judgment of the former president.

Judge Juan Merchan acted after one juror was dismissed when she expressed concerns about participating in the trial after details about her became publicly known.

The names of the jurors are supposed to be a secret, but the dismissed juror told Merchan she had friends, colleagues and family members contacting her to ask whether she was on the case. “I don’t believe at this point I can be fair and unbiased and let the outside influences not affect my decision-making in the courtroom,” she said.

Merchan then directed journalists present in the courthouse not to report it when potential jurors told the court their specific workplaces, past or present. That put journalists in the difficult position of not reporting something they heard in open court.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago

Took him fucking long enough.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

Bet the media ignore this, at least the ones in favor of Trump.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

What do they have to lose? Trump's own gag order isn't being enforced.

Just wait until their names get hacked off the NY justice system computers.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Long is the list of jailed and dead ordinary people who wrongly assumed that by association with the privileged class they would enjoy the same immunities.

Trump may die a free man despite his crimes, but journalists are working people.

A lot of us have noticed that Trump gets away with things that normal people would not, and that's not an accident. Trump can run his mouth about everyone forever, and he may never be held to account--and there are a lot of sometimes complicated reasons for that--but the same privilege absolutely does not apply to courtroom field reporters.

If I were covering this trial, I'd violate the court's instructions at my own peril.

That certainly does not mean that some folks won't be pressured to violate the order to save their livelihoods, but I would expect no less than swift and heavy consequences for people who anger the court and whose names aren't Trump.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Considering these conservative news organizations thought they could get away with slandering voting machine companies that had a lot more money than they do, I don't know that they're smart enough to not report on it.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They'll be removed from the courtroom at the very least.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

He did it on Thursday.

Now... That was still too late, but then when he set rules, they weren't based on hypotheticals.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 53 points 3 months ago

I'm most shocked that this was ever allowed in any trial.

There are a lot of pretty obvious situations where you wouldn't want the accused or their "associates" to be able to identify a juror (or their family or anyone they might be connected with).

[-] atomicorange@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

It’s because the US doesn’t do secret trials. By default, everything in the courtroom is open to the public. An open, transparent justice system works really well in a functional democracy, but it’s going to seem hopelessly naïve in our current proto-facist hellscape.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago

Right?? How is it not just standard that juries are anonymous?

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money trial ordered the media on Thursday not to report on where potential jurors have worked and to be careful about revealing information about those who will sit in judgment of the former president.

We don't have to guess who will follow the instructions. It's been days since this happened

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

That will stop Fox, NewsMax, and OAN

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

It might stop Fox, they're scared and been getting their assess kicked in court recently

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Jesse Watters already doxxed a juror and scared her enough to get her recused. Lawsuits that result in fines don’t mean shit. That’s just cost of doing business for Fox

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Maybe charging the fuckers with domestic terrorism will change their minds.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

Jesse Watters already doxxed a juror

That happened immediately before the judge made this order, and was part of the reason the judge did so.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Have you seen any info on how they're going to keep them safe and anonymous while going to and from the courthouse?

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
330 points (99.4% liked)

News

22526 readers
3544 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS