198
Am I wrong though? (hexbear.net)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 78 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Firefox stays winning.

Whatever happened to Netscape?

[-] TheKanzler@hexbear.net 69 points 5 months ago
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 39 points 5 months ago
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 30 points 5 months ago

And here I thought I couldn't love Firefox even more

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

Netscape was the sacrifice for Firefox. In the before times, there was the problem of slow and bloated browsers before memory was plentiful (and easy to download😉) so Mozilla created Phoenix which was a lightweight no frills browser that crashed every time I tried to open a jpeg with it, but other than that it was awesome and so much faster than IE or Netscape. Then due to a lawsuit, or threat of one, they changed the name to Firefox which stayed winning until about 3.5 when Chrome started really taking over in speed and abilities. :abe-simpson:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 45 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Firefox ftw.

but you're missing Gamer Chrome (OperaGX), which is very sad

[-] booooop@hexbear.net 36 points 5 months ago

Using firefox is praxis

[-] Yor@hexbear.net 29 points 5 months ago

Firefox gang

[-] SnowySkyes@hexbear.net 29 points 5 months ago

I've been using "Not Chrome" for 20 years and I'm not changing anytime soon. Always has been reliable for me. Though I wish they didn't change their icon.

[-] roux@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Firefox is best unless you have 224,538 tabs open. Or so I've heard.

I checked yesterday and my extensions were also taking up 1.3 GB of ram. I think one has a memory leak or some shit but idk which. Firefox just takes forever to launch for me and after a couple days of running it goes to a crawl.

E: thanks everyone for trying to help me btw E2: I might be an idiot. I think it might have been the amazing 2 GB of cached data I just deleted.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

As someone with literally 1.5 thousand open tabs - Firefox is way better than Chrome. Launches in ~10 seconds. Both use insane memory honestly, a few gigs, but that's modern internet for you.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

We expect better tab hygiene than that in the worker's commune, comrade.

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

In the revolution, just as every comrade plays a part in the march towards a brighter future, so too do my 1,500 tabs form a robust vanguard of knowledge and productivity.. probably.

I mean hey at least like 20% of them I need and will one day get to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

I don't know what you mean, I have more tabs than that open and they unload if I haven't opened them in awhile. memory usage doesn't scale with number of tabs. I think your extensions are bugged.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

When I transitioned to Firefox from Chrome, I did so in large part because it at least was better at managing 224,538 open tabs. At the very least at the time, it seems that Chrome held all of the information about the tabs in RAM.

[-] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

Firefox is the best, but I noticed Edge is more snappy at loading pages. Especially if its a page with a lot of images. But Edge is for libs, so I don't use it.

The conspiratorial side of me wants to believe that websites are coded to perform poorly when a non-Chrome browser is using them, in order to get people to switch to Chrome or Edge or whatever. Like the site detects the User Agent as "Firefox" and lowers its download speed.

[-] lapis@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

websites are coded to perform poorly when a non-Chrome browser is using them

many of them basically are, but not intentionally. a lot of web developers only test in Chrome, and Chrome does some really weird shit (especially with JS and CSS) that means if you target Chrome you’re passively degrading the experience for not-Chrome.

I personally develop my code targeting Firefox or Safari most of the time, since both work a lot closer to spec with JS and CSS than Chrome does.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

There's circumstantial evidence that most of google's sites degrade performance intentionally.

And plenty of sites try to stop you with a "only works on chrome" message, but work perfectly fine if you just spoof your browser string to look like you're using chrome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] neo@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

You can go to about:profiles and then relaunch the web browser with all add ons disabled to see if that changes things up for you. Though I imagine browsing the web without uBlock Origin on is its own special hell.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

How did this happen? Didn’t different browsers used to be, like, different?

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

10-15 years ago cross-browser javascript and rendering compatibility was a nightmare for web developers and chromium was free, popular/winning, and legitimately very good so it made sense to standardize on it rather than independently develop inferior engines

but now that it monopolizes internet browsing of course it has started to bloat and suck. let a hundred browser engines bloom

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

also i would argue that not enough was done to oppose scope creep in web standards. i don't agree that your web browser should be a platform for complicated applications that do more than deliver content and receive posts. even flash was a bridge too far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

also we didn't quite know google was evil yet

[-] DyingOfDeBordom@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago

They said they weren't evil! Who were we to know they'd lie about it, what are they, the Chinese?? This is just like communism

I channeled a redditor for this comment

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

make sure you perform a thorough banishing to get that spirit out of your head

[-] DyingOfDeBordom@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

don't worry I just thought too many thoughts about how china stay winning and it fled in a seething rage

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

the power of socialism with chinese characteristics knows no bounds

[-] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

When did Opera become "chinese"?

[-] lemming934 15 points 5 months ago

Here's a quote from the Wikipedia page:

In 2016, Opera was acquired by an investment group led by a Chinese consortium, the consortium included several Chinese companies such as Kunlun Tech and Qihoo 360.

[-] Pili@hexbear.net 13 points 5 months ago

Android Not Chrome would always make my entire phone freeze, apparently many people have that issue. I haven't had that problem with Android Chinese Chrome so far.

But Not Chrome is still the best by far on computer of course.

[-] PrimeErective@startrek.website 32 points 5 months ago

I love Android Not Chrome. You can install uBlock Origin on it, which kicks ass

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] sleeperdouge@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

I had times where the android Not Chrome would freeze on my phone. I turned off an extension that adds a panel for more buttons and the freezes disappeared. Idk if this will be relevant to your problem since it's your whole phone that froze but maybe you're using some problematic extensions or you may have had some settings that caused it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

if you have to use a chrome, crypto chrome has very good ad and tracker blocking built in at least. you can turn off the crypto nonsense

[-] CapnCat@hexbear.net 22 points 5 months ago

The maker of brave is a homophobe though, so I wouldn't suggest it

[-] muts@feddit.nl 18 points 5 months ago

That would also rule out javascript can't use anything anymore 😭

[-] PurpleCreation@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

You forgot one option: Librewolf - better firefox

[-] Zvyozdochka@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

Meh, it's just Firefox with a config applied out of the box and some new branding. They don't really patch anything of importance out of Firefox, pretty much all of their patches are just changes for their branding/styling.

You can find the config that comes out of the box here: https://codeberg.org/librewolf/settings/src/branch/master/librewolf.cfg which appears to just be https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/blob/master/user.js with a couple of extra things added like Brave's query stripping list.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nothx@hexbear.net 7 points 5 months ago

Not in the slightest. I actually use Safari over Chrome, that’s how sick I am of it.

[-] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago
[-] nothx@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago

Would be funny if it was, but it is a different engine than both chrome and firefox.

[-] dannoffs@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

It uses WebKit, which Blink (Chrome's engine) was forked from.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Finger@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

no more half measures walter

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
198 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23267 readers
328 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS