this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
606 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8497 readers
2977 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Berlin artist Simon Weckert used 99 phones and a handcart to create a "virtual traffic jam" on Google Maps

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 118 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's some security researchers that have done this before as well, and some "grey hats" that reportedly used this technique to get Google to route traffic away from them during their commute by spinning up a whole bunch of phones in their car like this.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you recall any of the names? I'd love to read those papers and see how effective it was. Depending on the city and the route, people might have no choice but to go over a bridge like that regardless of traffic reports.

[–] RedBauble@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

While I don't remember his name, I remember there was a Darknet Diaries episode about the researcher who first investigated the problem. The episode was very thorough, I liked it a lot. I also don't remember the name of the episode, so I guess this comment is kinda useless

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess this comment is kinda useless

Props for self-awareness and yet still smashing that "reply" button, but I still think your comment is slightly useful. I often just click the "cancel" button once the "useless comment" realization hits me.

Edit: I am wrestling with it now, just after I clicked reply.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Your comment was not useless. I learned about a new podcast that I checked out, plus you got to talk about something you liked in a way that made me go look for the episode - haven't found it yet, but found some other, interesting things along the way.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Darknet Diaries is SOOOO good.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“grey hats”

What's a grey hat?

[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Black hats are typical hackers, white hats are ethical hackers. So grey hats are just morally ambiguous hackers

[–] witx 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Typical hackers

Screw that, go check the original definition of hacker. Those who do bad business with computers are "black hats" not "typical hackers"

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course you're right, historically. But since the word hacker came to mean both good and bad in the general publics mind, this is where we are in 2024. We can't fight it.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

Chaotic neutral. The best and most fun.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Purple phantoms in Dark Souls 3

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I remember an old post about someone seeing a neighbor doing that, I think in Brooklyn or someplace like that.

[–] sneakybells@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That's clever. Just have a bunch of hidden buckets of phones on battery banks on your preferred route.

[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I thought it was way older than that

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Ah, nice context. Thanks!

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Now try it with maps off, see if google still tracks them.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even with gps off, they can get rudimentary location data based on pings to cell towers. It's not pin point obviously, but it roughly tells how many people are in a given area with a phone on them, smart or dumb.

[–] user224 6 points 1 year ago

I don't know if things have improved, but GSM-based positioning has accuracy of +/-2.5km.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We already know that it does, if you have location tracking/history on (Which it is by default)

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But will it still think this is car traffic?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Most likely does. Wifi location I think is typically on even if GPS isn't.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I guess android virtualization wasn't very developed back then

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

So when is Google going to try to have him arrested?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I doubt it. Replica Radio Flyer wagons are popular, and they look metal but are all plastic.

[–] anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Why not round it off to 100 phones? Why stop at 99? Why are you this way?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

top tier hacking