this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
230 points (100.0% liked)

196

17586 readers
520 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wallmenis@lemmy.one 41 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] xeekei@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago

The honorary even number.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neoman4426@fedia.io 29 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So you're saying there is one? Because the line that's replaced here is Tighten saying "There's no Queen of England" with the point of the scene being showing he's dumb for thinking something that does exist is like the other mythological things listed

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

there's no Queen of England though, Titan was just ahead of his time.

[–] kakito69@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Omg he predicted her death????

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TuEstUnePommeDeTerre@midwest.social 28 points 11 months ago

There hasn't been a Queen of England since the Acts of Union when the title was replaced with Queen of Great Britain.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’ve only seen the memes.

I thought that character was a she.

Huh.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 8 points 11 months ago

This is a good opportunity to go watch megamind

[–] FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

You should watch the movie. It's all kinds of fun.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

31521281 = 11 × 17 × 59 × 2857

11 × 17 = 187

11 × 59 = 649

11 × 2857 = 31427

17 × 59 = 10003

17 × 2857 = 48569

59 × 2857 = 168563

17 × 59 × 2857 = 2865571

11 × 59 × 2857 = 1854193

11 × 17 × 2857 = 534259

11 × 17 × 59 = 11033

11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+ 48569+10003+31427+649+187=5527398≠31521281

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

17 × 59 = 10003

you've got an extra zero in there, and you forgot the 1, but the rest of your divisors match my crude brute-force approach:

>>> n=31521281
>>> d = [ x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x ]
>>> d
[1, 11, 17, 59, 187, 649, 1003, 2857, 11033, 31427, 48569, 168563, 534259, 1854193, 2865571]
>>> yours=list(map(int,"11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+48569+10003+31427+649+187".split("+")))
>>> set(yours) - set(d)
{10003}
>>> set(d) - set(yours)
{1, 1003}
>>> sum(d)
5518399

same conclusion though: 5518399 also ≠ 31521281

bonus nonsense

>>> isperfect = lambda n: n == sum(x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x)
>>> [n for n in range(1, 10000) if isperfect(n)]
[6, 28, 496, 8128]

(from https://oeis.org/A000396 i see the next perfect number after 8128 is 33550336 which is too big for me to wait for the naive approach above to test...)

spoiler more bonus nonsense

>>> divisors_if_perfect = lambda n: n == sum(d:=[x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x]) and d
>>> print("\n".join(f"{n:>5} == sum{tuple(d)}" for n in range(10000) if (d:=divisors_if_perfect(n))))
    6 == sum(1, 2, 3)
   28 == sum(1, 2, 4, 7, 14)
  496 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248)
 8128 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 127, 254, 508, 1016, 2032, 4064)

:::

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

In number theory, a perfect number is a positive integer that is equal to the sum of its positive proper divisors, that is, divisors excluding the number itself. For instance, 6 has proper divisors 1, 2 and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, so 6 is a perfect number. The next perfect number is 28, since 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number

[–] btr_fan87@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Send nooddz

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

33550336 is pretty odd. look at those pairs. they must be fuckin.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Amicable with benefits

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 11 months ago

13

🖐️

🎤

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It's ok 69. You're perfect just the way you are <3

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

69 is a Nice number.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago (59 children)
load more comments (59 replies)
[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Perfect numbers are number theory not numerology

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean kinda? We're assigning importance to a neat coincidence.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

On the one hand, sure.

On the other hand, a lot of significant things in math and science came about because someone noticed and then studied a neat coincidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wutchilli@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I have a proof, but this comment box is too small to contain it.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

While you're at it, solve the "all perfect numbers end with a 6 or 8" conjecture.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] londos@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›