539
submitted 2 weeks ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wwaxen@lemmy.world 160 points 2 weeks ago

Time for malicious compliance: "Kids, today we're talking about two girls got their dad drunk and raped him to get pregnant.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago

They'll have to be more creative, because the demand is for teachers to tell kids about the Bible's place in U.S. history.

So I think teaching them about this might be more appropriate: https://www.npr.org/2018/12/09/674995075/slave-bible-from-the-1800s-omitted-key-passages-that-could-incite-rebellion

They might also teach about this man: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Coughlin

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 75 points 2 weeks ago

Or how about how the bible was used as an excuse to try to keep Americans dumb and ignorant. An excellent example of exactly where the Bible fits into American history.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately, these people don't believe in evolution either.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

You say "was" like it's not ongoing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zetafish@fedia.io 97 points 2 weeks ago

Some neighboring states that aren't christo-fascist are about to get some really good teachers. Welcome to Colorado!

[-] Winbombs@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Except teachers here are paid shit and there's little affordable housing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago

So I have friends in Texas who have lost their license for one reason or another. This has a wider range of effect than most realize. When applying for ANY other state licensing, in any other industry, the fact that your teaching license was revoked, no matter what the reason was (it won't say why on reports) it's a mark against you when applying for others. All they see is oh this person HAD a state license and it got revoked so, maybe we shouldn't grant this other one.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago

It's plainly illegal, and I'm sure the goal is for SCOTUS to take it up and make it legal.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago

It’s plainly illegal

SCOTUS will just ignore any precedents and give the states the right to do what they want.

We’ve already seen this playbook in action.

We’ve been fools for relying on precedent.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

That is certainly their hope. And there is no question it will happen if Trump gets back in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 57 points 2 weeks ago

Reading the Memorandum, it doesn't specify what Bible is to be used. Perhaps malicious compliance uses a "alternative" version?

Also found this from the Satanic Temple (who hopefully is on top of this) -

If a public school permits the distribution of religious materials to the student body, they have opened a limited public forum and are obligated to allow religious materials from other faiths. This principle applies to other forms of school-sponsored religious expression as well.

Also funny how these hypocrites go on and on about indoctrination, and then want to indoctrinate every kid in the state by law.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

It's always projection.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What good does dumbing them down by defunding education have if you don't indoctrinate the new cattle?

They're farming GOP idiots.

Keep em poor, uneducated and breeding without a way to abort and in the future no contraception

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's always projection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

The goal is, here, to have an accurate view of American history

By teaching bronze age fairy tales set in the Middle East.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Surely this could backfire in so many hilarious ways?

  • Teach the parts that conservatives don't do, and teach your class to call out injustice everywhere.
  • Teach the bible in Aramaic or Ancient Hebrew, and give the kids 30 mins of study time to learn whatever they want from it.
  • Use it as an exercise to teach that many parts were written thousands of years ago, and doesn't have current medical or societal advancements, so that many parts might be up to interpretation.
  • Compare it to Islam, Judaism, and other sects of Christianity - and teach that they're basically the same thing and that everyone should get along.
  • Reference that the pope said years ago that even nonbelievers that led a good life would be offered a seat in heaven, so be nice and it'll all be fine.
[-] huzzahunimpressively@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Also you should explain to your child students what is a prostitute

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 weeks ago

The funny thing is that a basic understanding of the Bible is actually important for making sense of American history - the people making that history were strongly influenced by the Bible and so unless you know at least the major "plot points", their actions (and a lot of literature) won't make much sense.

With that said, I don't trust Oklahoma to teach about the Bible in a manner appropriate for historical analysis rather than religious dominance.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

he people making that history were strongly influenced by the Bible

Depends what era you're talking about and what you mean by influence. I would say that the reason Thomas Paine's Age of Reason was so popular and that Jefferson made his own version of the New Testament, which removed the supernatural, suggest that the Bible was less of an influence in the founding of the nation than would be supposed here. The fact that Muhammad is in as venerated a place on the Supreme Court building as Moses also suggests they didn't think it was the source of all wisdom.

Really, you need to look no further than our legal system though to see how little influence the Bible and Christianity actually have. I don't just mean the First Amendment, I mean the fact that our whole system is basically a gradual evolution from the laws of Ancient Rome. They had trial by jury in Ancient Rome. It was a permanent jury, not a jury of one's peers, but you can see the skeleton of our legal system and how it came from those ancient heathens, not Jesus.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you for that. Incidentally, I have never heard for a big push from Muslims to remove Muhammad from the building, or at least obscure his image. I'm not sure if that's because they aren't aware of it or just because it is too old to do anything about it at this point.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] zazilicious@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

I'm so fucking tired of the US. Shit just always seems to get worse, and for every little victory, we take another huge leap towards a fascist theocracy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 2 weeks ago

Teachers can make this backfire by teaching kids about how Jesus said, among other things:

  • Rich people don't go to heaven
  • Jesus's answer to religious people not wanting to see things was for the people complaining to pluck out their eyes.
  • How Jesus told his followers to sell their shit and give it to the poor.

All things republicans hate because it goes against their ideals. Also they can talk about how in Acts it says Christians lived communally or just read James 5:1-6 verbatim.

But I guarantee the schools will force their teachers only to read parts of the bible that the state demand, because it's not about Christianity, it's about using religion to control people.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 31 points 2 weeks ago

Oh just fuck off.

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

Can I teach ANY part of the bible?

[-] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago

I’m waiting for the malicious compliance stories. Any Oklahoma teachers reading, maybe reach out to The Satanic Temple for ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

they’d face the same consequences as one who refuses to teach about the Civil War

Now I’m really afraid to find out what this includes

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 weeks ago

Which is a hilarious Freudian slip on their part. Who is it that they think don't want to teach about the Civil War? Could it be the ones who instead refer to it as the "war of northern aggression" and try to erase the context of slavery by saying it was about "states rights"?

[-] AncientMariner@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What they failed to realise is teachers can have a unique ability to make kids hate a subject.

If you force them to do it, they can do it really badly without it being obvious.

I can imagine reading the Bible word for for in monotone from day 1 won't be a good experience.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Just read only the parts about incest and rape and waiting for all the parents to complain

[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Any of you remember Kitzmiller v. Dover? It was a case that essentially ruled that teaching ID/creationism was a theological doctrine and thus couldn't be included in the biology curriculum of schools across the country. While the issues here at not the same (teaching creationsim vs mandatory bible studies), they have the same ideological underpinnings. Unless we're talking about Sunday school*, schools must remain secular institutions where discussions of religions are from a neutral perspective in regards to the humanities. As to regards to a hypothetical Supreme Court case: considering how ultra-conservative the Supreme Court has become in recent years, I fear that they might side the theocrats.

*Are those still a thing?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I can’t wait for the lawsuits to follow this bullshit.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

I'm still pissed we are spending tax payer money defending this shit. We are doing something similar in La.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago

Today we read again from fiction.

[-] dhcmrlchtdj__@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

And this is the same cunt that was blaming "the radical left" for "politicizing" the death of a child under his care. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/23/us/oklahoma-nonbinary-student-superintendent.html

[-] circuitfarmer 13 points 2 weeks ago

I'd love to see parents flabbergasted by their children refusing the shellfish daddy worked hard to buy, and making sure their clothes don't use mixed fabrics.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
539 points (98.9% liked)

News

21850 readers
5205 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS