106
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DO NOT GET A VOTE ON WHETHER OR NOT TO ELECT A SENILE PRESIDENT THIS CYCLE (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by Zuzak@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

That said, I voted for him in the last election, and I will again out of harm reduction. He has improved on policy, but l even if he didn’t, the American people do not get a vote on whether or not to elect a senile President this cycle.

You can have any President you like, as long as he’s senile. If you vote, we’ll get a senile President. If you don’t, we’ll get a senile President.

The question is whether you want senile and gleefully cruel®, or just senile(D). I’ll take just senile.

screm-aAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The choices are not cruel vs senile, they're:

whywhywhywhywhy child emperor controlled by obama-drone advisors

a-little-trolling child emperor controlled by mission-accomplished advisors

maybe-later-honey healthcare isn't on the table this election General dynamics needs more money to get ukranians and palestinians vaporized

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Corporate needs you to find the difference between these advisors same-picture

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 48 points 1 month ago

It's amazing that these fuckos haven't picked up on Biden's gleeful cruelty. It has been on display his entire career. In the 2020 campaign he was threatening voters to their faces and sneering at them when they told him they wanted to vote for him but were worried about something he didn't care about.

[-] the_itsb@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago

One of them linked the Wikipedia article about Perot's campaign and I learned something new:

Exit polls revealed that 35% of voters would have voted for Perot if they believed he could win. Contemporary analysis reveals that Perot could have won the election if the polls prior to the election had shown the candidate with a larger share, preventing the wasted vote mindset. Notably, had Perot won that potential 35% of the popular vote, he would have carried 32 states with 319 electoral votes, more than enough to win the presidency.

That is so wild to me, I had no idea he had been that successful and that it was only Wasted Vote Mindset that stopped him.

It reminds me that there was a Perot bumper sticker on the telephone pole outside my childhood home:

Ross Will Win
WITH YOUR VOTE!

[-] context@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

it was only Wasted Vote Mindset that stopped him

and a concerted media campaign to fabricate that consensus mindset. what a wacky election, i can't imagine a perot presidency. bush sr had the full backing of the cia, of course, and clinton was clearly acceptable, but perot was against the gulf war and what eventually became the rules based order we find ourselves in. he was too much of a liability to imperial ambitions, i think they would have pulled additional shenanigans to prevent him from being elected.

but this election could be wackier. what happens when enough people think their vote is wasted no matter what?

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

I honestly think that Perot (whose politics outside of his anti-war stance are just as idiotic and self-serving as every other politicians) gave the DNC and the RNC enough of a scare to lock everything down and ensure that a third party would never even taste national election success again.

[-] context@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

oh he was a tool of capital through and through, for sure

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's these useful idiots that prevent a 3rd party from being viable continuing to give life support and consent to existing hellworld.

We need to do the same thing over and over really expect nothing fundemental to change. Way to hold the genocidal line fuckers.

[-] context@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

at this point i won't be too surprised if a third party candidate ends up winning. suddenly it feels like it's going to be a few decades until november, so a lot could happen.

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They're talking about America, not a sensible country.

[-] context@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

oh i'm certainly not talking about a sensible outcome here

[-] Speaker@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Vermin Supreme, tear down this wall!

[-] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So they don't think that financing a genocide qualify as being "gleefully cruel"? What an interesting opinion .

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm sorry but anyone that actually watched the debate could see Trump had a working brain and Biden did not. Trying to claim that one is as senile as the other is going to get you laughed at. People saw with their eyes, and they will see a second time with their eyes if Biden doesn't run from the second debate.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 17 points 1 month ago

Trump doesn't even have a working brain. It's just Biden is so absolutely gone that he makes Trump look healthy in comparison. Trump has been rambling absolute nonsense and braging about all the dementia tests he has taken for the past decade.

[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

Neither of them could draw a clock, but only one has a tolerance for meth

[-] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

You'd think people would be accusing us of wanting a senile president. After all, is it not better for the rest of the world if the president of the great satan can't remember what he was talking about 10 minutes ago?

Or is it an admission that who the president is doesn't actually fucking matter if Biden can still be elected?

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Or is it an admission that who the president is doesn't actually fucking matter if Biden can still be elected?

I've legitimately seen people say this as a reason to vote for Biden, even someone I know irl. I don't even know how to respond to it, like, any semblance of democracy is just completely dead at that point.

[-] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

I've legitimately seen people say this as a reason to vote for Biden

Yeah that's kind of a bizarre take to have because it's explicitly saying you'd prefer Biden's unelected gang of advisors over Trump's unelected gang of advisors. Maybe the president the individual can be convinced to support good things every once in a while if enough people get him on a good mood on a topic he has an emotional connection to. But you certainly can't push the executive branch as a whole in any way shape or form.

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

Love all the "it doesn't matter if he's senile!!" cope

Alexa, what is "the imperial presidency"

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Your insolence will be reported to Lord Bezos. Bow down before Him." — Alexa, probably

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

Cowards

[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

once there were democrats in the streams in the mountains

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

Vote so it doesn't get [worse] sweetie so-far

[-] screwthisdumbcrap@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Fucking evergreen

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

disgost ugh, its just so servile

[-] veniasilente@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Boy do I love it when people give me excuses to vote 3p.

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

I look forward to continued lectures from Americans about which countries are democratic and which are authoritarian

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

your "democracy" is a sham and here's why | halim alrah

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

"Why are you taking a bath?"

"I'm not."

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
106 points (97.3% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15834 readers
494 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
KiaKaha@hexbear.net
wantonviolins@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
blashork@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net