170
submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

A U.S. Coast Guard cutter on routine patrol in the Bering Sea came across several Chinese military ships in international waters but within the U.S. exclusive economic zone, officials said.

The crew detected three vessels approximately 124 miles (200 kilometers) north of the Amchitka Pass in the Aleutian Islands, the Coast Guard said in a statement Wednesday. A short time later, a helicopter aircrew from Coast Guard Air Station Kodiak spotted a fourth ship approximately 84 miles (135 kilometers) north of the Amukta Pass.

All four of the People’s Republic of China vessels were “transiting in international waters but still inside the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone,” which extends 200 nautical miles (370 kilometers) from the U.S. shoreline, the statement said.

“The Chinese naval presence operated in accordance with international rules and norms,” said Rear Adm. Megan Dean, Seventeenth Coast Guard District commander. “We met presence with presence to ensure there were no disruptions to U.S. interests in the maritime environment around Alaska.”

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] qooqie@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

Fallout 3 being a documentary would be a wild turn of events

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, if we'd collectively survive 76 first.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

TBH I'm still disappointed that 76 survived 76.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Probably drifted off-course due to high winds like their balloons.

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

'Ships in international waters' ... Total non story

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

"Chinese military ships in international waters but within the U.S. exclusive economic zone" is a bit less of a non-story.

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

Exclusive economic zone is an area of the sea in which a sovereign state has exclusive rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources. It doesn't limit travel.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

But it does show force when a rival power sends military ships through it. Which is the point.

This is not something China normally does. They have no legitimate military reason to do so. You do understand that, right?

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Specifically, the location is fairly far away from China and the South China Sea. So that by itself represents a level of blue water capability that the PLAN has not been well known for.

[-] some_guy 9 points 1 month ago

Why should we care? I’m being serious.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, China acted within all known maritime laws, so them being close isn't in and of itself a problem. But imagine if the US Government didn't comment on it and some shithead right-wing conspiracy asshole like Alex Jones found out about it? There'd be all kinds of new false realities about US-China relations.

Undoubtedly they'll do it anyway, but re-spinning the narrative is less effective than making one up whole-cloth.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago

Also, we stop this all the time. Everyone does this all the time. Riding just on the edge of a border, maybe dipping a toe onto the other side a little bit. It's testing to see how good your competition is, training, and moral building.

What makes this a little more newsworthy is how aggressive China had been lately, mainly against defenseless fishing boats; being cowardly bullies. They're not going to turn water canons on US commercial vessels, much less warships, but one benefit of cozying up to and aiding Russia's invasion of Ukraine gives them a freer hand to driver around in the Bering Straight. Like a dog, pissing on telephone poles.

[-] some_guy 6 points 1 month ago

Huh, what a completely reasonable response to my post. I hadn't considered this but I absolutely agree. Thanks for providing some good context.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sending a warship within the EEZ isn't a violation of maritime law but it is provocative and shows that China is trying to "test the waters" and see how we respond.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

We, as in you and I, shouldn't. This happens all the time. Any country with a military does this, whether it's by land, sea, or air. The military cares because it gives them an opportunity to see what the ships are doing, what they're equipped with, stuff like that. And because we have to protect our borders, lest they turn up on our land somewhere unnoticed and start saying it's theirs.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
170 points (95.7% liked)

News

22470 readers
4763 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS