350
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Kamala Harris is already seeing a wave of big money donor support since President Joe Biden dropped out of the race.
  • Some of the party’s top financiers opted to hold back funds after Biden’s June debate performance drew concerns from Democrats about his mental acuity.
  • The progressive donation platform ActBlue said it raised $46.7 million after Biden endorsed Harris.
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 53 points 4 months ago

27.5 mil in 5 hours is an impressive amount of support.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

maybe Donald will see how much money he can raise if he drops out

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

I just donated to her campaign.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Y’all were worried about people not voting if Biden ran. That kind of sentiment and pressure was a huge contributor to this move. Demand more of your politicians. We control them. Don’t let them control you.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I hate to say it, but it would not surprise me one bit if Harris loses in November because Rust Belt moderates in PA, WI, and MI wouldn't vote for a black woman.

I hope I'm wrong, but right now, for me, that's the least surprising of possible futures.

[-] expr@programming.dev 7 points 4 months ago

Possible, though Republican attacks against her are likely to get a lot more overtly racist and misogynistic, which will likely alienate the center considerably.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You trade some votes for others. I think dems are fucked either way cuz they focused on Biden for too long and didn’t give another candidate time to build trust and hype. Really poor politics on their part. They fumbled this election in spectacular fashion.

[-] Intrama@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] wreel 20 points 4 months ago
[-] nepenthes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Edit: can't read

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Why do they even need money? I don't get it. Other democracies work just fine without these massive amounts of money.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well they simply have gaps in regulation around elections. They tried to reform campaign finances with HR 1 For The People Act but it was never called for vote in the senate due to Senate Speaker Mitch "The Legislative Reaper" McConnell who was notorious for refusing to call things to vote.

One of the parties simply does not want to fix democracy.

The money gets spent on billboards, flags, yard signs, pamphlets, door to door outreach, renting out venues to campaign, etc.

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

And why is the campaign needed? People can just go vote. Why do they need ads for voting?

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago

If you choose not to campaign and your opponent does, what do you think will happen? If your opponent convinces everybody that you're going to raise taxes and increase the deficit, that you're corrupt and racist, and people don't even know your name from anything else then how many votes do you think you'll get?

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Aren't most people watching TV anyways? Or internet? In Germany, we also have this independent website called Wal-o-mat where you can answer a long set of political questions to determine your political views. Then it'll make a tierlist of multiple parties to vote for that'll best fit your political views. Almost everyone ignores posters and ads and there is barely any ads anywhere; some on city exists and that's pretty much it. Just don't understand why ads for defaming the political opponent can be so effective. Is everyone really that dumb to believe in them?

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, Exhibit A is that Vladimir Putin's opponents have been defamed and shamed into dropping out or being arrested every single election for over a decade, usually involving a sex tape that vaguely resembles them or allegations of substance abuse.

Exhibit B is that in the USA older people with exposure to Cable News like Sinclair Broadcast Group and Fox News are far more conservative and more evangelized than their younger counterparts who mainly use the internet but radicalizing in the opposite direction, and yet another stark contrast to the new generation of voters who have been exposed to YouTube and TikTok algorithmic pipelines to extreme ideologies. I believe Germany itself has experienced this firsthand with recent election upsets and hard right youth activists.

It is highly effective, you are not immune to propoganda. If you want to read more about the mechanisms of how or why it works, start with the works of Siegmund Freud on suggestion and work your way to more modern theories.

[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Have you ever been outside?

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm from Germany. We have a totally different political landscape and understanding of democracy here.

[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

If you think politicians don't do campaigns in Germany, you've never been outside.

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They do. But that's usually limited to just posters plastered all over streets.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
350 points (98.3% liked)

News

23412 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS