866
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 223 points 4 months ago

Do not start a headline with "Darkness reigns over Wikipedia"!!!

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 54 points 4 months ago

What's wrong with Darkness?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 99 points 4 months ago

At last, I won’t get blinded whenever I open Wikipedia

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 89 points 4 months ago
[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago

No, thats the job hunting website. Wikipedia is the one anyone can edit historical facts.

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

(Which is apparently a workspace AI company)

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 82 points 4 months ago

The year is 2024, hacker news stands strong as only remaining website to not offer darkmode.

Thou art forbidden to peruse our content in the dead of night; verily, our content is for the light of day alone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

If you are on desktop and you aren't sure how it works, try out this Wiki page and in the top right corner you can see an "eyeglasses" looking icon. Click that and set it to Automatic or Dark.

[-] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 36 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wikipedia is such a beauty and I'm so glad and grateful it exists. Surely it's not perfect, but it's so inspiring and hopeful to see a collective effort be so successful. I sometimes wonder, what new projects we've seen since that are equally inspiring. The Fediverse certainly is beautiful but it's also still a little bit fringe. I personally really like MusicBrainz, but that started 24 years ago What new collective projects has the internet brought us in recent years? And what collective projects could the future bring us?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 26 points 4 months ago

Very happy to see it come to wikipedia!!

But I think it also needs some polish. The contrast is too high and the blue on black of the hyperlinks is too garish for sure.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hello DarkReader my old friend...

~~Which you still need for mobile~~. Edit: Nope.

[-] GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nope, its available on mobile too. Just go to

Sidebar>Settings>Colour

(Options to choose from)

  • Light

  • Dark

  • Automatic

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] janNatan@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

The Wikipedia app has had dark mode for a while. Plus dark mode in Firefox works fine with no extensions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

The Washington Post: "Democracy dies in darkness"

Wikipedia: "Knowledge that is shared in torchlight is fucking awesome"

[-] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Democracy dies in darkness

From what I've seen, it dies in plain sight to standing ovations

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I thought this was gonna be about Wikipedia finally shutting down because nobody donates

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They are actually getting too many donations, many times more than they need to run wikipedia. There was and is a big conflict about the unsustainable growth of donations to the foundation and its questionable use of those funds.

[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wikimedia Foundation (the org behind the Wikipedia and similar projects) does get more donations than their operational cost, but that's expected. The idea is that they'll invest the extra fund^1 and some day the return alone will be able to sustain Wikipedia forever.

Although, some have criticized that the actual situation is not clearly conveyed in their asking for donation message. It gives people an impression that Wikipedia is going under if you don't donate.

Others also criticized that the feature development is slow compared to the funding, or that not enough portion is allocated to the feature development. See how many years it takes to get dark mode! I don't know how it's decided or what's their target, so I can't really comment on this.

They publish their annual financial auditions^2 and you can have a read if you're interested. There are some interesting things. For example, in 2022-2023, processing donations actually costs twice as much as internet hosting, which one would expect to be the major expense.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Huh, now that is a truly interesting bit of information.

[-] weststadtgesicht@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 months ago

An interesting bit of information without any sources at all...

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] aidan@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Similar to Mozilla (but not from donations but instead of its millions paid to it by Google)

load more comments (16 replies)

finnaly I'll use wikipedia on my laptop more

[-] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 4 months ago

Finally I don’t need to have an account just to have dark mode

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 18 points 4 months ago

People were making accounts?!

Ive been using browser extensions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boxscape 13 points 4 months ago
[-] suction@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Finally the l33t hax0rz from Anonymous can browse Wikipedia in peace

[-] netvor@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Dark mode, night mode, light-on-dark design, or whatever you want to call the version of computer content that doesn't feel blindingly bright at night...

Don't wanna be that guy, but these template news-article openings always make my brain hurt. Come on, as if everyone has ever called it anything else than "Dark mode".

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

All jokes aside, I might imagine it wasn't all easy to do it correctly. Great job!

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I can’t be the only one who doesn’t see well with dark mode.

[-] EddyNottingham@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

You're not, but having both is awesoooooome!

[-] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

A long time coming, but because of their recent changes in the past couple of months if I have JS disabled on Wikipedia I either have an obnoxiously large blank margin on the right, or I get pop-up annoyed by this dark mode announcement with JS enabled and private tab browsing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

democracy dies in dark mode

[-] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 8 points 4 months ago

It doesn't seem to work on the German Wikipedia. Super weird decision to tie display settings to a language.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago

Isn't this like one of the signs of the end times?

[-] ZarkleFarkle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

Or the start of a new age of enlightment and the spread of ideas online with ease.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

LOL took 'em long enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
866 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60108 readers
1852 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS