267
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Despite broad popular support for legislation to curtail police violence, Congress got nothing done. Democrats, despite controlling both the House and Senate in 2021 and 2022, slow-walked the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, insisting on bipartisan support that never materialized. Ending qualified immunity, the legal standard that prevents police officers from being sued for wrongdoing even when they knowingly break the law, was deemed not urgent by Jim Clyburn, then the highest-ranking Black member of the Democratic House majority, despite that being a core demand of the protest movement. Once that slipped away, it opened the door to even smaller reforms floating out of reach.

In the end, despite the embarrassing photo op in which Democratic leaders donned matching kente-cloth stoles and knelt on the floor of the Capitol building, no reforms were passed into law. After much hand-wringing over activists’ use of the slogan “Defund the Police,” no major efforts to defund large police departments were ever implemented. Police killings continued to increase: Officers killed at least 1,232 people in 2023, the deadliest year in a decade.

Now not even a single representative who swept into Congress on the heels of the popular mandate of police reform remains.

It’s a stark outcome. Consider, for example, Georgia Rep. John Lewis, an activist during the Civil Rights Movement and the leader of the 1965 march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge, in Selma, Alabama. Lewis continued his activist work for years afterward, arriving in Congress only in the 1980s, but he served 17 terms as a celebrated member of the Democratic House caucus until his death in 2020.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240814115829/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/08/omar-tlaib-bush-bowman-primaries-squad-democrats-aipac-israel.html

Worth noting, this opinion piece came out before Ilhan Omar's primary took place, which she ended up winning

e; wrong archive link

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 111 points 3 weeks ago

They were pushed out by a foreign nation (Israeli) lobby. Let's not forget how this happened.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 89 points 3 weeks ago

Now, just over four years later, both Bowman and Bush have been routed out of Congress, thanks to a historic deluge of big-money spending against them. They battled challengers in the most and third-most-expensive congressional primaries in American history, respectively, and each was outspent roughly 4–1. In both races, the overwhelming majority of that money came from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the conservative, pro-Netanyahu lobbying group that has fast become one of the biggest outside spenders in elections, funded in large part by Republican megadonors. The cryptocurrency industry, also increasingly Republican-aligned, chipped in at least $1.5 million to knock out Bush and over $2 million to knock out Bowman too.

Thanks Citizens United! I love having an unlimited amount of dark, untraceable money from foreign powers influencing our elections!

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

There need to be massive protests/riots about this shit. I'm talking about showing up on senators' lawns with 10,000 or more people with guns (to keep police at a distance) or some shit. These people need to fucking FEAR US, the fucking voters or they will continue to rape our society out of existence.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I like the energy, but if you try to organize anything like that undercover cops will infiltrate your group, push you to go beyond self defense to planning pre-emptive violence, and then get a nice commendation in their file when you're all arrested and charged with terrorism

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sad but true. As the saying goes, when peaceful revolution becomes impossible, it's no bueno.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

If money is considered speech, it becomes the only speech that really matters...

[-] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago

We have a very short attention span in the usa

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 69 points 3 weeks ago

Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent every year to make it that way

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 25 points 3 weeks ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

It wasn't that Americans forgot...

It's that Israel spent millions of dollars to keep them out of office. Mostly because they kept mentioning Israel is activating committing a genocide, but considering their practice of giving Black Israeli immigrants birth control for years while telling them it was vaccines....

They likely weren't a fan of BLM either.

The short attention span part is when Harris and Walz have both given speeches at the annual AIPAC conferences but people are pretending they're perfect because they're not 20 years past retirement age.

I'm still hoping they'll do the right thing while in office, and they'll undoubtedly be better than Biden or trump...

But they're miles away from perfect. And pretending they are won't help anything, it just means they only get pressure to move to the right.

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

sure, AIPAC and continuing genocide had nothing to do with it

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ending qualified immunity, the legal standard that prevents police officers from being sued for wrongdoing even when they knowingly break the law, was deemed not urgent by Jim Clyburn, then the highest-ranking Black member of the Democratic House majority, despite that being a core demand of the protest movement.

I'll go to my grave believing the reason Bernie wasn't the candidate in 2020 is because of coordinated primary dropouts and Clyburn's endorsement of Biden.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Clyburn#Presidential_endorsements

You can bet Bernie would have made police reform happen.

Clyburn's endorsement of Joe Biden on February 26, 2020, three days before the South Carolina primary, was considered pivotal in the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries. Several analyses have determined the endorsement changed the trajectory of the race, due to Clyburn's influence over the state's African-Americans, who make up the majority of its Democratic electorate. Until Clyburn's endorsement, Biden had not won a single primary and had placed fourth, fifth, and a distant second in the Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada caucuses and primaries, respectively. Three days after the South Carolina primary, Biden took a delegate lead on Super Tuesday, and a month later he clinched the nomination.[84][85][86] Biden went on to win the 2020 Presidential election. Clyburn's endorsement of Biden, and subsequent political endorsements in later democratic primaries, have given him a reputation as a political "kingmaker".

Having said all that, it seems a little shitty that they wrote this piece before the primary.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

You can bet Bernie would have made police reform happen.

He would have tried. But there's a real and persistent fear that corporate money would have turned on him during the general election and sunk his campaign.

Consider that Biden only squeaked by with 40,000 votes across three states, even in a media environment that was heavily favorable.

I can see Sanders going out to Trump like Corbyn did in the UK, and for the same reasons.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

I see your point, but also still feel the primaries were intentionally manipulated. (twice)

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I absolutely agree.

I just don't think the manipulation would have ended at the convention.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Fair point, but I don't know when we're going to get a shot at someone like Bernie in office again. AOC is an up and comer, but the right has already vilified her Clinton-style since she took office, so I'm slightly worried that's not in the cards for her. I guess I'm just lamenting that, even while realizing that even as president they can only do so much.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t know when we’re going to get a shot at someone like Bernie in office again

If we keep losing quality candidates like Cori Bush and Jamal Bowman to money bombed hacks, I don't know if we'll see another Sanders in my lifetime.

I guess I’m just lamenting that, even while realizing that even as president they can only do so much.

Presidents don't just fall out of the coconut tree. They're a consequence of their material conditions and everything that came before them.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

While MeToo and BLM were fairly short-lived political movements, they had an incredibly large and positive impact on the culture.

I remember a time just before covid when saying “black lives matter” was a controversial phrase. Now, not being able to say it is fairly scandalous. But for gay marriage, I can’t think of many things which were as widely accepted as the fight for racial equality (in slogan, at least).

I’m not excited for the pendulum to swing back, led by corporate america, joy.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

While MeToo and BLM were fairly short-lived political movements, they had an incredibly large and positive impact on the culture.

I think MeToo is still felt, and its my perception that it's changed culture and attitudes in a way that will persist, even as I acknowledge it's not complete.

I'm expecting another BLM-style country-wide protest in about another twenty years when it turns out once again we've done nothing but wallpaper over the status quo on police brutality. The only thing that gives me some hope is that we're clearly into the era where everyone having a good camera in their pocket is a wildcard that so far seems to be a very positive detail most of the time.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

they had an incredibly large and positive impact on the culture.

I wish this was true, but I've only seen our financial commitment to police violence increase over time.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But for gay marriage, I can’t think of many things which were as widely accepted as the fight for racial equality

Yeah....

Look at all the people who get REAL fucking pissy if you say "LGBT" instead of "LGB"

And as for racial equality? At the same time people were acknowledging the systemic prejudice against black people (but not acknowledging TOO hard because still gotta get theirs) EVERYONE, left and right, were making snide remarks about how COVID was China's fault and Asian elders were being attacked in the street. And we were told to shut up because it was detracting from the real issues. And... we did because that is what we have been trained to do.

The BLM protests were a beautiful thing and I marched as part of my state efforts. But, like with most activist movements, it was immediately forgotten once something else happened (or, in this case, we were allowed outside again). But it was incredibly specific and mostly just highlighted people's inability to care about multiple things at a time.

But hey, we solved racism in the same exact way we solved sexuality and gender!

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago

Less 'allowed out' and more 'forced to return to work'. Good luck getting mass unemployment when another pandemic happens (when, not if). People not being wage slaves worried about their survival opens up a lot of dangerous freedom to demand change.

[-] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 3 weeks ago

"The white man will try and satisfy us with symbolic victories rather than economic equity and real justice" - Malcom X

[-] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

If there were all of two, did the "era" ever really start?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Came here to ask the same question. Hopefully, it doesn't require a handful of activists to change policy and change institutional norms for the positive.

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats promised leftists they would do a thing then didn't do the thing? I'm shocked I tell you shocked.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Outrageous claim that democrats had both the house and the senate. Manchin and Sinema are not democrats.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

How you say... AIPAC

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I guess Americans are still racist AF then.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not necessarily? Just because these politicians supported BLM doesn’t mean they represent other qualities that their constituents want. You can’t run or sustain your position on a single issue

Edit I think the AIPAC funding is more about creating a legend about how big and bad and effective it is, but couldn’t unseat Omar, a bigger thorn for such a funding body. I think these Squad politicians need to reflect their constituents more

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
267 points (93.8% liked)

politics

18802 readers
5472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS