178
Stranded Boeing Astronaut Forced to Slum It in a Sleeping Bag by Himself (futurism.com)
submitted 2 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It sounds less than ideal — but as the report notes, Williams and Wilmore's difficulties don't end with their sleeping arrangements.

As with every ISS mission, the Starliner astronauts initially had specific jobs to do on board the station that would have eaten up their eight-day journey. As Time reports, their main priority was checking in on the Boeing capsule and making sure its communications, life support, and other essential functions were in good shape.

With that checklist done and their journey having been extended until possibly February due to Starliner's technical issues, Wilmore and Williams have instead been assisting their fellow crew members with their tasks and experiments, including repairing a urine processing pump.

Beyond that lovely job, Wilmore and Williams were also forced to stretch their clothing rations because there's no laundry on board the ISS. Generally speaking, astronauts pack enough clothes for the length of their journey, and with their trip home having been pushed back repeatedly, the Starliner crew had to make do until a Northrop Grumman resupply mission finally came to deliver them new clothes earlier this month.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] some_guy 56 points 2 months ago

Beyond that lovely job, Wilmore and Williams were also forced to stretch their clothing rations because there's no laundry on board the ISS. Generally speaking, astronauts pack enough clothes for the length of their journey, and with their trip home having been pushed back repeatedly, the Starliner crew had to make do until a Northrop Grumman resupply mission finally came to deliver them new clothes earlier this month.

I can imagine hating everything about being up there and hating life and hating your job and hating boeing so fucking much right now. Sounds miserable. At this point, no one will be excited to do a one week mission ever again because of the possibility of this happening.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago

Trust me, wearing used clothing is far, FAR from the most uncomfortable thing an astronaut does. If something like that bothers you, you wouldn’t sign up for being an astronaut.

[-] some_guy 21 points 2 months ago

Hell, I wouldn't sign up just because of the amount of exercise they have to do every day to avoid atrophy. I'm far too lazy.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

Eh, I feel like any time I would get annoyed I’d just look out the window and marvel at the view

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

And remember that everyone you love is down there and you can't even hug your kids. But hopefully you can fix that urine recycling system before everyone dies of thirst.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I think the astronaut life is not for you...

Some people would happily accept the indignities of space flight, for the unique opportunity to go.

And as you point out, fixing the urine recycling system is a critical job, it's not like it's busy work. If it doesn't get repaired, everyone dies of thirst.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

It's not. For sure. Actually getting kind of creepy with projecting his attachments onto them with every post about the mission.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They thought they were going to be there for eight days. That is what they happily accepted.

I might happily accept a vacation to Tuscany, but if I found out I couldn't leave or see my family for months after I got there, my mind might be different on the subject. And I wouldn't be stuck in a little space station.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Uhh... I've never heard a single astronaut say "I wish I'd spent less time in orbit".

Most astronauts sign up because they want to go to space, but then they end up only spending 1-6 months in space over the entirety of their career.

Imagine you wanted to be a chef, so you went to the finest culinary schools and then eventually for a job at an acclaimed restaurant. But then you had to just peel potatoes for years, before finally they let you be a provisional chef for a week and you actually got to use the skills you trained for, but still knowing that they'll put you back on boring prep duty at the end of the week... But then at the end of the week the head chef gets sick and he's out for the whole month! How would that feel?

Remember, this isn't a vacation, this is their career. This is what they want to do. And these people have the most impressive resumes you've ever seen in your life, no joke, reading one is intimidating. They could do just about anything they want, and they choose this.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Their family is so close too, around 200 miles away.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Way closer than if you're serving in the military overseas! That could be thousands of miles away!

Well you're closer for at least for some of the day... Which is about 45 minutes long because you're orbiting so fast...

Ok, so you're not really closer, but sometimes you are, if you squint!

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

At this point, no one will be excited to do a one week mission ever again because of the possibility of this happening.

I'm sure theyve got plenty of capable people lined up that are chomping at the bit to do it. People know how risky going to space is, and if this turns into just an extended stay, it's not going to deter the people who have been training to do this.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

It sounds like you can definitely imagine a problem.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago

As opposed to what? Sharing a bed with another astronaut? I thought that solo sleeping bags were the standard.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Most of the regular crew gets a sleeping bag in a cupboard with some small locker space for personal effects.

Wilmore has just the bag, off in the Japanese module. And I guess he has to store personal effects in the Starliner. Though presumably he only packed for 8 days.

In climate controlled zero gravity, there's no point to having more bedding than a light sleeping bag just to keep you from floating off somewhere. My guess is the big selling point on the cupboards is some noise damping, and maybe some protection from lighting. Spacecraft have noisy machines running all the time to keep you alive

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I know they have earplugs and masks available, so it doesn't really sound like this is a big deal. I think the article is just trying to farm views.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Wilmore has just the bag, off in the Japanese module.

He gets a private suite?!

[-] rollerbang@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Are you expecting him to get an invoice for above standard accomodation? 😁

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

NASA need to sent him a sleep mask and couple of ear plugs ASAP.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Better than sleeping on the front porch.

[-] lath@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Can you get cabin fever in space?

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

They've each done longer missions on ISS than their current stay. Suni once held the record among female astronauts.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Considering they're trapped in a place the size of a couple of buses? I'd say absolutely.

[-] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago

Am I missing something? I thought their lives were in danger or something. We're here talking about sleeping arrangements and clothing? From what they described, I put up with FAR worse while camping in various weather conditions here on earth. Am I confused about what they're going through?

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Essentially the chance of something wrong happening on there return is high than like 1/270 or something, Scott Manley said 1/270 in a video so that's where I'm getting that number, so they're keeping them up there until they can either bring that chance down or get them another way home. If shit were to hit the fan in their orbit and they had to come home right now they could hop in Starliner and return but the risk for non emergencies is higher than NASA wants to accept right now.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They aren't stranded on a desert island, but they are stranded.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
178 points (92.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world