140
submitted 1 month ago by FelixCress@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

God I wonder why Palestinians are so upset. Oh wait:

Last October, Palestinian grandmother Ayesha Shtayyeh says a man pointed a gun at her head and told her to leave the place she had called home for 50 years.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Did you editorialise the headline?

Extremist settlers rapidly seizing West Bank land

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

No, I used auto fill. There seems to be different headline on the main page, different headline when you actually click on the article and different when you auto populate which I assume is the original one. It looks like it has been changed multiple times.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, the BBC has been caught writing some headlines that minimise Israel's role in the conflict. They've probably changed it after pushback.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

So like, even the link is the headline you gave in the post. You click it and you even see it on the page before it updates to “extremist”.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

BBC edited it and removed Israel as culprit from the headline to make it look as if it this is some extremist fringe sect. They do not want people to know this is official Israeli state policy.

[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Headlines are sampled randomly for the first few hours of an article going live to measure exposure. The headline that gets the most clicks wins.

There are a lot of sites that do this.

It causes headaches when it comes to social. Usually the original headline is preserved in the url, but sometimes they'll use a unique id and then include the editorialized headline option so they can track which headline you clicked on.

Also editorial decisions on wording based on pushback, legal threats, etc.

[-] gressen@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago

Yes, and why?

[-] Tja@programming.dev 25 points 1 month ago

It's not the wilderness, why are they called settlers? English already has a word for what they are doing, even multiple: invaders, occupiers, tresspasers...

[-] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

settlers also has other connotations which is probably why is was chosen.

to settle something = agree

to settle down = calm and mature

to settle for something = compromise

to settle a dispute = legal and fair

None of which is remotely close to what these people are doing when they steal.

[-] some_guy 7 points 1 month ago
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

And often murderers, too.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 24 points 1 month ago

John Oliver had a piece recently about it. Quite enlightening.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

I have literally no sympathy for these settlers. I hope they have a brutal, agonizing, slow, and humiliating death.

[-] some_guy 8 points 1 month ago

I think we should treat them as an occupying force and intervene, but what do I know.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Israel in one sentence: radical religious nuts believing in 3000 year old fairy tales commits robbery and murder.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
140 points (94.3% liked)

News

23024 readers
3048 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS