253
submitted 2 months ago by fpslem@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Delta jet clipped a smaller plane on a taxiway at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport on Tuesday morning, tearing the tail off the smaller plane, officials said.

Delta Air Lines Flight 295, which was en route to Tokyo, was taxiing for takeoff when its wingtip hit the tail of Endeavor Air Flight 5526, which was headed to Louisiana, knocking the Endeavor plane's tail off, according to the Federal Aviation Administration and Delta.

...

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

Two delta planes collided on the tarmac, but they call the smaller plane an endavor plane so they can pay the pilots less.

[-] Album@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 months ago

Endeavor is owned by Delta.

Will be interesting to see who's fault this is.... Sounds like ground ATC.

[-] Finadil@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Side of the plane even says Delta...

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 8 points 2 months ago

That probably just scraped off from the other plane like when a car leaves an imprint of their license plate during a crash.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’ll buff right out

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I don't remember fully about that airport(after all, it is a full 20 mins from my house) but as i recall this is a major Delta hub, and because of that the entire section where they board and then move to taxi is all Delta only.

[-] Lookorex@lemm.ee 38 points 2 months ago
[-] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

That's not typical. I'd just like to point that out.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 2 months ago

They should just fly it out of the environment.

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Some of them are built so that the back doesn't fall off at all.

[-] criticon@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

'Tis but a scratch

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 28 points 2 months ago

That'll buff right out. No need to get insurance involved.

[-] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

It's just the small wings they still got the big ones

[-] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Ooof... That looks EXpensive and not just for the CRJ. The larger plane (it looks like an A350, but not sure) is going to need its wing structure and wing box all thoroughly inspected. Outside of the engines, those are the two most expensive structures on an airplane. Not saying that it is going to be a write off for either plane, but it is a possibility. I'm curious if the bending moment of that impact was outside what the larger plane's wing box was designed for. That force had to be huge, given the length of the wings on the large plane.

I look forward to seeing the analysis from some of the better aviation Youtubers on this one.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Slap some speed tape on there and you're good to go.

[-] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Was it a Boeing? Just take a bit of tape from the door.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nope, one was an Embraer and the other looks like an Airbus

Edit: Looks like the smaller one was a Bombardier CRJ900 and the bigger one was an Airbus A350

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think we have different definitions of "clips"

[-] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

It's not like the front fell off

[-] Trabic@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

I mean, for large enough values of "front," the front did fall off.

Good thing they got it out of the environment.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Val shipLength = 200ft

Val frontOfShipLength = 200ft

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Just wanna drop in to say that the people responsible for keeping the planes the planes from getting romantic on the ground are the same people who chaperone them in the air.

[-] SpoopyKing 11 points 2 months ago

Most airports have separate controllers for taxiway coordination and for runway and air coordination. Many larger airports separate tasks further, like having a separate approach controller. So, usually different people.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Same qualification though. You need to be a qualified ATC to clear a taxi, and air law states that the ground rolling stage as soon as the plane is moving under its own power is part of the flight. It goes as far as this is a flight accident and will be treated accordingly.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A lot more room to maneuver in the air, though. Like a third dimension and stuff

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah but on the ground you can roll slower than 250 kph though.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You probably don't want to do much rolling in the air

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 months ago

I’m personally excited to hear about a delta flight that made it out of the gate.

[-] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

“Bitch, I’m a plane”

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

I guess they need to increase the delta between the planes....

[-] breakingcups@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Wonder if it was the pilot or the ATC.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'd lean towards ATC.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago

I’m never getting on a plane again

[-] buttfarts@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago

boss man: "Okay team 😀 good to see you all here. Now unfortunately we need to go over some stuff 😕 again and it's not 🚫 good. Remember how before we talked about how planes aren't supposed to be touching each other...?"

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

The big fish eat the little ones.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The larger plane needed to show dominance

[-] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pete Buttigieg, you're having a bad years.

Edit: this is what happens when you do political favors and appoint a politician to a nontrivial, professional position.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

My plane daddy can beat up your plane daddy.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Poor lil guy

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
253 points (98.8% liked)

News

23422 readers
2635 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS