560
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
560 points (99.0% liked)
News
36118 readers
3361 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is great, assuming Nelson or someone similar is NASA Admin after January and not Elon Musk. That’s a fucking terrifying thought.
I'd like someone else as NASA admin tbh... We need to axe the SLS.
How can someone with that much money look like such a dork?
It's the ugly growth on his neck. If he would just get that removed, we'd all like him much more.
His head? I know! Ew
I think you're giving too much credit to surgery. He'd still be a huge dork. That little flap of skin didn't dress him in the morning.
I assumed they were referring to his head...
Oh! Is that what that thing is? I still say he should get rid of it. It's not doing him any favors.
Ooo please tell me Musk leaked some secrets… please tell me he’s about to get a dank cell someplace…. Unpleasant.
Hmm... I want him to be in a dark cell, but I also don't want Russia to have any advantages because of what he did.
Russia is collapsing, probably somewhere around 2025-2026, hi-tech won't help them. So as a trade-off I'd take a little secret to putin for an unpleasant cell for musko.
Then they sell that info to China. I'm still not happy about it. But I'll take it if it means Musk in a cell.
Oh yeah didn't think about that. Possibly to Iran and NK too...
Ohhhh boy. Don't fuck with the space program.
The severely under funded space program? Oh yeah, that things super valued.
Well, NASA sometimes works with sensitive info and projects of which sometimes can get shared with their contractors, SpaceX included. Having Musk going through with his escapades, acting otherwise unstably, and now talking with an unfriendly figure to the US. It starts to raise some serious questions regarding national security. NASA is more or less just bringing it to attention.
Just because they're underfunded doesn't mean they lack teeth. SpaceX isn't launching in the US without them.
They're underfunded mainly because Congress would rather spend money through SpaceX instead of NADA, because they can make money from SpaceX and other private goons. NASA benefits all Americans, which is just Communism...
Lol, everything in the states is under funded with the exception of the military, so it's a good thing the military doesn't need to send anything to space.
Edit: Apparently I dropped this /s
Air Force and Space Force(cringe) often send up satellites and other material into space.
https://www.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Article/2197774/defense-support-program-satellites/
https://spacenews.com/air-force-selects-space-programs-for-quick-start-initiative/
Also NASA was initially just a program to develop ICBMs
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-349-95851-1_3
I'm aware of this. I don't understand what point you're making though. Are you saying that SpaceX hasn't sent up anything for the military?
I think we're confused by what you're saying.
The military sends their own stuff up, NASA isn't involved.
SpaceX don't send anything up yet for the military but they start next year.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/10/spacex-sweeps-latest-round-of-military-launch-contracts/
Frankly I'm more concerned about the military using Starlink than SpaceX rockets.
https://spacenews.com/pentagon-embracing-spacexs-starshield-for-future-military-satcom/
Our entire intelligence network is dependent on the space program because satellites.
Yank the fuckers top secret clearance IMMEDIATELY
Yes, AND nationalize spaceX
Should have happened after he started fucking with Starlink in Ukraine to aid a hostile state actor. Insanity.
It should be looked into.
Half of America is reciting the narcissists prayer on their behalf right now.
Silly cheaf. We don't investigate billionaires
Traitor trash musk
He didn't really call for it though... He just vaguely said that if it was true, it should be investigated - in a way that doesn't commit him to action.