I see the bad faith actors making a final push. : politicalmemes

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 minutes ago

Lemmy.ml is all about this right now. The idiots... They claim to want things to lean more left, then they help the right with their narrative.

Ever since coming here (Lemmy) I've started to develop a solid bias against the far left. They are defeating their own goals when they do this shit.

For the record, I'm independent but I vote blue because the GOP is insane.

[-] sploosh@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Ranked choice baybeeee!

[-] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 94 points 11 hours ago

A few more days. Please, just gotta hold off a week and a half. After that, I can shift gears from "Fuck's sake please just support the non-fascist candidate against the literal fascist" to "These are the problems in this fucking country and they need to be addressed, and fuck Harris if she doesn't"

Just spare us an immediate future of fascism. Buy yourselves, and ourselves, more time to work. Even if you think this is ONLY buying time, buy it. Because things are NOT going to be easier to organize under a fascist regime - and the idea that the more people suffer, the more they're inclined towards your, specific, political views, is just not borne out by reality.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago

Third parties have some valid ideas and I don’t oppose voting them in down ballot to create an alternative to the two main parties.

But voting for them as presidential candidates right now means that I’m effectively voting against my ideals.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago

Until third parties have a presence at the national level it’s stupid to vote for one for president.

If you think Democratic presidents don’t get anything done with a Republican Congress just wait until both sides of both houses refuse to work with a third party president.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

This is what I've been saying. Even if a third party somehow managed to win the Presidency, they still can't do anything if Congress doesn't play ball. And knowing Congress, they're not going to. There's zero base for a third party President to stand on because none have made the effort to win seats in the House and Senate.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

And that's not even taking into account the judges who get to rule on things, who have all been appointed by one of the two parties. Even if Congress works with them a judge can just throw it out.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I do think it depends on where you live. In about half of states, your vote for president is meaningless. Mississippi isn't going blue and Massachusetts isn't going red. In those cases, voting third party has the chance to effect future federal election funding.

But yeah, if you're in a state with literally any chance at all of being a toss up, don't vote 3rd party.

[+] steve_floof@lemm.ee -36 points 10 hours ago

If your ideals are support for genocide of the Palestinian people, letting states decide the rights of trans people, and fracking, you’re in luck, 2 excellent choices right at the top of your ballot

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 11 points 8 hours ago

Let's see what you do and say after the election. Bet it's crickets.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago

Way to miss the fucking point entirely there, champ.

[-] VubDapple@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

No need to let pesky reality intrude on your idealistic utopian daydream I guess.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

America has been supporting the genocide of the Palestinian people since before my parents were born. This election isn't gonna change that.

If you have empathy get used to being disappointed by the US government and, well, everything else.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

Da. Is correct to show support for transphobia with voting of Harris. Also glorious third-party voting will ensure only the strongest leader will survive, much like the great leader Putin.

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 22 points 10 hours ago

I can’t wait to talk about this country’s shit healthcare again from November 6, 2024 thru April, 2028.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Amuuurikah! Fuck yeah!

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Edit: I have no idea what this is from, but somehow a ginormous flag-painted truck pooping out another, still giant flag-painted SUV that then proceeds to make a mess and what looks like endangering a child in a desert town, possibly of middle eastern origin, seems VERY American to me. Though I apologize for the appalling lack of bacon and guns, which I will henceforth rectify with this actually real picture:

[-] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 1 hour ago

That first GIF is from Team America: World Police, it's a Bush-era film from the guys who made South Park. It aged pretty badly in a lot of ways since it's lampooning the War on Terror, but it's still hilarious IMO. Worth a watch if you like the idea of South Park as an R-rated puppet movie.

[-] Limonene@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago

For anyone who honestly believes in third party stuff: try supporting ranked voting at the local and state level. Once we have more ranked voting at local and state levels, it will be easier to push that at the federal level, which is the best way to solve strategic voting problems in presidential elections.

Nobody would support ranked voting for presidential elections if that's the first time they hear about it. But if people use it already in local elections, and see that it works better, then extending it to presidential elections is a logic choice.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

Bruh. Jill Stein isn’t even on the ballot in my state. She’s got no chance.

Despite my earlier organizing, there are no independents on anything down ballot.

I live in a swing state so, sorry De la Cruz, I can’t vote for ya.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world -5 points 4 hours ago

Funny you should choose this meme picture of a Pakistani cricket fan when their third party actually succeeded because people didn't fall for the usual two party propaganda of "they'll never succeed until we first fix X problem"

[-] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

ngl, feels like holding in the worst fart. Can't wait to start complaining again!

[+] Aedis@lemmy.world -11 points 7 hours ago

Honest question. What do you do for someone who's sole issue right now is to stop the genocide? There's only one candidate going for that afaik, and it's not Harris or Trump.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago

Who would that be?

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 hours ago

And more importantly, do they have a chance in hell of actually accomplishing anything meaningful beyond lip service?

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -2 points 4 hours ago

Under FPÐP, if it isn't eiðer of ðose candidates, ðen ðere is no candidate.

You're just voting to be complicit to ð degree everyone else chooses be it less or more.

[+] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml -8 points 8 hours ago

People have been talking about third parties for months, but there's always an excuse

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world -4 points 6 hours ago

Every election there is some excuse as to why we can not pivot to third parties. To me the bad-faith actors are all these clowns who say oh lets not bring it up til we think its appropriate. Like when is it gonna be appropriate? Some of us were for the likes of Perot and Nader, its been literally 3 decades of people saying hush up third parties. Like at this point, you can only assume these people love the status quo, and they are willing to fight any deviation from it.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Seriously though. Liberals should focus their energy on turning rightoids onto their side as opposed to trying to shame leftists if they actually cared about things like genocide or the environment. They won’t because they’re cowards and would rather shame the left endlessly and claim to not understand why every election the left doesn’t see why “ThIs TiMe ItS dIfFeReNt” every election for like 70 years is annoying to leftists.

[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

The Simpsons in 1996 sounding just like the people in this thread.

[+] shoulderoforion@fedia.io -14 points 10 hours ago

bad faith "anarchist" actors on lemmy?, gwon

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago

Most of them claim to be MLs or 'non-sectarian' leftists, not anarchists.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

They don't claim to be russian-funded trolls based out of other countries?

Weird.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago

Anarchists would oppose duopolist monocracy all year.

Authoritarians on Lemmy are likely too diverse and disunited for this comment to use that sort of sarcasm as a display for the spread of false flag anarchism.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

As an anarchist I oppose the existence of nation states altogether.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Well, it's good to aim high. Opposition, i.e. the destruction part isn't enough, we have to do the build part too. There simply isn't a critical population in Western/Northern countries yet. We don't grow Napoleons.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

My strategy is like a strangler fig. Every empire decays and dies and hurts a lot of people. If we build up mutual aid and other systems to keep people from dying when the empire crumbles we'll skip the regressive period that generally comes after.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

That's pretty cool because if you're wrong or it doesn't happen in your lifetime, you still help people and have a positive influence.

Political Memes