162
As opposed to...?
The abnormal gay guy vote - like a gay guy that likes Vance. That's weird AF.
Vance is like a extremely haired baboon who will be despised.The comment is also discriminatory as what constitutes a „A GOOD GAY GUY“
Statistically tied against these guys...
"We're still going to send them to camps once they have elected us, but I am grateful for their support."
Vance thinks "normal" gay men are like him: closeted and married to women.
I do know some gay guys who are Trump supporters but to think gay men are a monolithic group is not surprising from this guy.
A lifetime of conservatives calling me the F-word when they find out, yeah, that'll definitely do it.
I was thinking, have they met any gay men? I know a couple who voted trump in 2016, but never again will.
“If you are a middle-class or upper-middle class white parent, and the only thing that you care about is whether your child goes into Harvard or Yale, obviously that pathway has become a lot harder for a lot of upper-middle class kids,” said Vance, who has talked about his family's economic struggles growing up and has a degree from Yale Law School. “But the one way that those people can participate in the DEI bureaucracy in this country is to be trans, and is there a dynamic that’s going on where, if you become trans, that is the way to reject your white privilege?”
I don't even know where to begin with this....
What the fuck does it even mean? It's like buzz word salad
I think the key is "DEI bureaucracy". He's trying to say they don't let white kids into Yale unless they're trans because being 'just white' isn't enough diversity.
Your first time experiencing conservatism?
According to JD "Couch-Fucker" Vance, I transitioned at 32 years old to... get into Harvard or Yale? Or become a DEI hire? I already have a degree and was already gainfully employed. I actually lost rights and privilege transitioning. I'm just a woman, simple as that. Maybe if he finally comes out of the furniture store and embraces his true self, he could get past this? This man is fucking dangerous and creepy as fuck.
Sheer factual wrongness aside, most GOP rhetoric around LGBT people is based on not just a complete lack of empathy, but active avoidance of empathy. Not for one moment will they consider what gender dysphoria might feel like to an adolescent child, or how strongly wrong they would have to feel it to actually transition.
They could imagine these things easily but they work extremely hard not to.
You can tell Trump has his arm so far up Vance’s ass he's speaking for him.
No, Trump isn't thinking about it on that level. You think Trump is concerned about kids deciding they're Trans to get into Yale? His only concern is that when he goes to grab a pussy, he doesn't get a handful of dick instead.
(Unless that dick is Rudy in drag, but we all know about that one....)
You’re saying Vance is a creepy ventriloquist meat puppet. You know, that does explain a lot.
In the republican party a 'normal gay guy' happens to be a closeted homophobe who loves to hate.
Check out The Bulwark podcast. Tim Miller seems like a pretty normal gay guy, who is a republican, and hates the shit out of Trump. I honestly can't conceive of who Vance is talking about with this.
Himself.
Anyone who still identifies as a republican is not normal, especially if they're LGBTQ+.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YOU VANCE
The F they won't!
source: me, a normal gay guy
I think they're just trying to set expectations as high as possible so that if they lose, then their accusations of cheating will sound more plausible, giving them more room to actually try to cheat the election.
I'm not even gay but that man is hot.
The fuck does normal gay guy mean? And honestly, the fuck does normal mean?
To them it probably means "people who don't let anybody else know they're gay or publicly defend the LGBTQ community, so that we can pretend gay people are really rare and don't exist around us"
Reminds me of when Colbert had NPH on the Colbert Report. They are talking about NPHs sexuality and I forget what prompted the quip but it was glorious. Something like "and that's why you're one of the most threatening gays because of how non threatening you are."
That's kinda what I think they mean by "normal" gay.
Lindsey Graham?
Whatever it means, Trump and Vance ain’t it.
Imo, this belongs in nottheonion. How do you signify a community on Lemmy?
!nottheonion@lemmy.world I think
I have quite a few gay friends that are about as normal as can be (ok maybe slightly nerdy) but not one of them is a Trump supporter. Anecdotal yes but it’s a pretty large sample.
Vance seems to be talking a lot about people that are gay or he thinks are gay. Humm.
Is that the "closeted gay guy who endlessly votes against his own rights because fuck em?"
‘Because if they don’t, we will bump them higher on our enemies list’
This's my take also. Start laying the scapegoat groundwork early so it won't be such an abrupt pivot for the constituency.
I have never been prouder to be a not-normal guy.
🤣🤡
Since Vance is clearly a normal gay guy, he would def know.
He means the Peter Thiels of the world.
Perfectly normal sociopath.
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
162 points (95.5% liked)
politics
19159 readers
4637 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS