90
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world to c/baldurs_gate_3@lemmy.world

I used to always try for the best outcome but with this have it seems like half of the time a failure also leads to an amazing consequence and story.

Like this from act one in the Underdark:

spoilerI had to find a hidden gnome that could supply me with gunpowder, but she was so much on edge that she lit up the barrel of gunpowder and blew up the whole room, leaving half of my party dead. A suicide gnome bomber. I couldn't convince her that I was not an enemy. Reloaded just to see if I could successfully do it, but much preferred the first outcome of the dice roll, so had to reload and try 6 times until I failed again. What a game!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dreadgoat@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago

If we're talking specifically about dice rolls, I generally accept failures. But I absolutely save-scum to get around anything I perceive as "videogame bullshit" such as an unexpected scene triggering a conversation on a character I would NEVER want having that conversation, even if they pass the rolls it feels icky to have someone like Lae'zel playing diplomat.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

I feel like this is one of the aspects of DnD the game doesn't do a great job of. In the tabletop you sometimes have one character handling the conversation but you can usually switch pretty easily. Like the paladin could be talking to someone and fail to persuade them, then the barbarian steps in to intimidate or something.

[-] blorgon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It does bother me quite a bit how conversations are so one-on-one. I really appreciate the peanut gallery comments from my companions, but they're too few and far between. I would love if there was some way to make manual checks based on the dialogue but still totally dependent on the player understanding what types of check they might need.

E.g., I'm talking to an NPC as Tav, but the NPC mentions something which I pick up on as sounding religious (and my Tav isn't versed in religion). I should be able to make a religion check as whichever companion I want -- essentially, let the player role play for the whole group the same way an actual group of people would in DnD. The game is already meta-gaming for you in exactly this way, by performing, say, a religion check when my character probably wouldn't have picked up on any religious undertones, and now I'm wondering why my character suddenly knows about some obscure religious proverb or some such.

[-] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I wish that would have been implemented. Maybe at a later update or a mod?

[-] Tyrangle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the approach I take. I can roll with character deaths and dice rolls that fundamentally alter the trajectory of the game - I just can't tolerate losing my agency to quirks of the engine. I once lost 3 companions because they were standing on a trap during a cutscene - didn't hesitate to reload in that case.

[-] blorgon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Traps in this game are so frustrating. Why are you walking into the trap I just warned us all about?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 2nsfw2furious@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly the same here. Did I somehow click something behind the camera, causing my moron to run directly at the giant enemy crab I just managed to carefully avoid? Yeah I'll reload.

Same if it's a dialogue option I (or the NPC I'm talking to) clearly misunderstood. In tabletop or real life it could be cleared up by "no, party member, I only told the bad guy I'd help him as a lie" even if it added a persuasion or deception check. In game, there's just no dialogue option to say "sorry, i didn't mean it that way" in most situations. See also: accidentally romancing the wrong person as many players apparently do

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

Surely the main point is rolling with dice rolls.

Doesn't save scumming kind of take the point out of having the rolls?

Feels like it would suck a lot of the fun out the game to me.

[-] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

A lot of games just don't put much thought into players that constantly fail at things and don't really make it enjoyable.

[-] eendjes@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago

BG3 have something called karma dice to balance it out if you’re unlucky with your rolls. It’s on by default.

I always roll with the rolls, failure is part of the game.

[-] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, I'm aware of the option, but I was talking more about a failure being jsut that - a failure with no alternative interesting path or development. Obviously not the thing with BG3.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Kind of, for me some rolls I'm fine with accepting failure and some I'm not. I have accepted some very serious consequences from failed rolls but sometimes I just don't want to deal with it.

Ultimately I guess everyone plays the game differently.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Depends on how devastating the outcome is, and whether I feel it's locking me out of the play style I wanted. It's my first playthrough, I'll prob be more into letting the dice fall where they will on the next go around.

I almost never replay games but with this one there's just so many different paths through, different characters. EG I keep seeing people talk about Karlach as a player character but... let's just say after meeting fairly early on I guess I chose wrongly, because she was not joining my party on account of

spoilerhaving no head

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Oh you missed out, wyll has been permanently in camp since I met Karlach. She’s an anchor of the team in my book as a super tanking barb also doing 40ish damage around with a maul I gave her

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will 100% be saving her next go around. Everyone keeps saying how fun she is to have around.

I completely neglected Astarion, found him initially annoying, plus the cheeky fuck

spoilerliterally tried to drink my blood while I was sleeping
! Also haven't used Will at all, nor Halsin, nor any of the many other characters that can be recruited. Actually looking forward to replaying with a completely different team.

[-] mothersprotege@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not big on replaying games, but I'm missing out on so much content by murdering everyone, that I'm looking forward to playing again as a good guy. To be clear, there's no shortage of content for murderhobos. The game is just fabulously dense.

[-] Ashtear@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

She's the biggest kid. It's adorable.

Has some strong performances in scenes later, too.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

She’s the biggest kid. It’s adorable.

Never thought it possible that a game choice would make me feel guilty, but here we are haha.

[-] Ashtear@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Failure had a massive impact on my story. I wasn't planning on going for an evil run, but I couldn't stop someone from doing something very bad and it changed everything, from characters, to main story, to even gameplay since a character's kit changed. People died, and probably the personality of the character changed, too (I'll find that out next run).

I hated it in the moment, but I'm glad I did it because it's made the run so memorable.

I've still been loading when dumb gameplay happens, like how Tav just walked into a room to cast a spell I thought she had range on, or I forget to bring the rest of the party into combat after I broke a party member off to ambush.

As for who did the thing, it was a late Act 2 spoiler:It was Shadowheart, in that moment

[-] Hillock@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I too ended up with an more evil run than intended due to "failure" or maybe more underestimating the consequences of my (in)action which led to the death of a companion. In almost every other recent game I played I would have reloaded at that point. But it coincidentally aligned with me finding the Ancient Tome so I changed my Conjurer Wizard to a Necromancer and dipped into the evil side. I don't regret it at all. So now I go with whatever happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 year ago

I don't reload combat unless I totally wipe, or want to start the fight over entirely.

I reload most of the other checks because failure is rarely interesting here, there's no fail forward or succeed with cost. It's especially irritating when my character flubs a roll they have like +10 on.

I don't typically reroll stuff that has a very high dc that feels like my character couldn't do. Like if there's a DC 20 check and I have a +1, I'll probably just accept the loss.

I'd rather it was like fo:NV where you either have the skill or you don't.

[-] wclinton93@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I reload a lot. If failures led to interesting outcomes more often then I'd stick with them, but they usually just lead to combat.

[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I'm reloading a lot right now as I'm trying to figure out the "video game physics". I've misunderstood a few game mechanics so I've reloaded to try again.

I'll probably also reload to open doors and stuff just to see the content behind there. My game time is limited so I want to see as much as I can on my run through the game.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

For dialog & ability checks, I feel like failing is part of character design, and if I've chosen to sacrifice charisma for constitution, then I should play the low CHA path. There's always revivify, but I have scummed over real death. Sometimes, I'd look up the game consequences of success/failure, and it's never game-breaking. For all the 'choices have consequences' talk, you still have to be able to finish the game. That said, years of RPG experience has taught me to always have a max CHA talker and a max DEX lockpicker.

[-] koorool@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Glad to hear it's enjoyable to fail in BG3. I haven't played it yet due to lack of free time. But when I played Disco Elysium, there I had so much time wasted on reloading to roll again non-recoverable rolls. In DE they were often just cutting you of from enjoying the moment.

[-] eendjes@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago

Disco Elysium is a game about constant failures. It’s a central theme in the game. Save scumming in that game, it feels like it would lessen the impact of the story.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 4 points 1 year ago

While I agree, DE does have a couple of moments where it breaks its own design principle of "fail forward". Not so much when it comes to progressing the main story, but that isn't really the point of the game anyway.

The vast majority of rolls in DE are totally fine to fail, however (and failure sometimes results in a superior outcome!).

[-] scops@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

DE IS a bit touch and go in the beginning though. Especially if you have a character without a ton of starting Morale. I lost of a good chunk of game time because I wandered into the pawn shop, realized that I had pawned my gun during a bender, and lost the game because my character just gave up on life. I had to avoid that line of discussion completely to make progress.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

I think you have your games backwards lol. 99% of checks in BG3 have no interesting failure states. They almost all lead to combat or less content overall. Whereas disco Elysium actually has tons checks that are enjoyable or interesting to fail.

[-] Lith 4 points 1 year ago

I found most failed rolls in DE made me enjoy the moment more, sometimes even moreso than a success. Especially with non-recoverable red checks. The only times I save scummed were when I kept failing a white check I had a really high chance on, or when I really wanted to see both outcomes on a red check. The only required checks in the game give you hundreds of bonuses if you explore the area around them first.

When it comes to save scumming for a more perfect route, I always like to let my first run in a game play out however it does, because that's my one chance to experience the game at face value, so suffering only makes it better. Then I make my second run a perfectionist run for the catharsis.

[-] Keegen@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

If by rolling I loose characters I'm invested in and my only options are 3 Charisma rolls on my 10 Charisma character, each with a 15 skillcheck? You bet I'm save scumming the fuck out of that! Otherwise I'll use Inspiration and only save scum if I have both proficiency and a high ability score and the dice decide they don't feel like rolling above 3 today.

[-] swordsmanluke@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I will roll with failures if they're narratively interesting. Failed to open a door and used my last set of lock picks? Reload.

Failed a roll and pissed off the NPC I was trying to charm? Them's the breaks! 😜

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sacha@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It depends. Sometimes I'll save scum a success if I rolled with a failure previously. Just to see the outcome. Usually I just roll with my failures, though.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I critically fail a roll that I would have succeeded on otherwise if rolling a 1 wasn't instant fail on a check with my highest bonuses, you best believe I'm using an advantage die to re-roll or reload my save if I am out of those.

If I fail a check for something I am not built to handle, I let it slide. Unless it's a forced dialogue and it chose the worst possible character for the interaction.

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

I don't reload dialogue failures, but honestly between Enhance Ability and Guidance I rarely fail, and when I do I usually have 4 Inspiration saved up for rerolls.

I've reloaded during fights to test interactions ("does throwing an unconscious person deal damage to them?") but not to, for example, undo a bad turn that led to an NPC death.

[-] AsimovsRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How do you actually throw a NPC? Most are too heavy for my barbarian.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I try to roll with the punches, but I will reload when I get tripped up by not understanding DND things, or when I need an NPC to stay alive. Like, in Act 2, I failed utterly at something and was going to just roll with it, until I saw it caused the death of an NPC I needed for Karlach’s personal quest. So I reloaded again and again until I got it right. (Same with the tower defense section you need to finally recruit Halsin.) I’m not good at the kind of tactical planning you need for fights in this game, so it takes me multiple tries to figure it out.

I won’t reload for bad rolls in conversations, though, even if I completely whiff something with a Nat1. That’s the kind of thing that makes the game replayable for me.

[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I often save scum when I try out new things. This game is so complex, I often have no idea if an idea I have is even possible, so I set it up and try it out before reloading and playing for real.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mostly stupid mistakes and the big decisions, like accidentally starting a fight with an entire faction or a misclick causing something really bad. I try to keep it to a minimum though, because half the fun is being surprised and going with the flow. But I do have a general "theme" in mind, and the dialog options make following it a bit difficult sometimes.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll leverage the built in options to manipulate failed rolls with skills to improve the odds, but I only load saves if I die and have to,

[-] dfc09@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I only ever save scum pickpocketting. Years of DnD has taught me that fucking rolls up can often lead to more interesting developments. That being said, I also try to maximize success chances with guidance, finding advantage, building characters to be good at their jobs, etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LPodyssey07@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The only time I can think of that I reloaded to get a different outcome was in act 2 where a party member wanted to do something and I failed at convincing them not to do it.

And another time where I used all of my inspiration to pass a check so I reloaded to see if I could do it without using all the inspiration…

But i think I go with it most of the time

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

In theory, I only reload when there's been an issue that's somehow mechanical in nature, like when I was first learning how stealth worked, or when a misclick sends characters running into stupid stuff. In theory, I roll with my failures, especially narratively interesting ones.

In practice, I need to work on playing this game less anxiously. I'm reloading more than I would like and part of why this game is so good is (I'm told) how fun and interesting failure is — that's where great depth comes from. I feel like by being too persnickety with outcomes, I'm nerfing my own experience

Worst comes to worst, there's always inspiration, which I'm never short on. I appreciate having the inspiration, it feels like a small endorsement of the instinct within me that makes me want to get the perfect outcome. It's like saying "a little retcon, as a treat", because all good things in moderation.

[-] thewildnaylor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I tend to only reload when something buggy or unintended happens(misclick) or if it's a really risky/story related thing I feel my character would be good at but got a nat 1.

But this has been one of the few games I've totally rolled with most of my dialogue/skill failures just because they still feel decent narratively. I'll save finding out what the successful/alternate outcomes are for next playthrough!

[-] UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'm coming from more FO:NV where I'm used to skill checks, not random chance... So I'm scumming like crazy on my single player save.

On my multiplayer save we're aiming for Chaotic Evil so we're rolling with the punches.

[-] Morgikan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I scum only high risk big decisions. Even then I will try to just roll with what I get. Lots of unintended fights. Some of which are very challenging, but the story feels much better than if it's done "perfectly'.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I do the opposite: I plan on savescuming to try a stupid thing, but it ends up being nice or unconsequential so I keep it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
90 points (93.3% liked)

Baldur's Gate 3

6322 readers
51 users here now

All things BG3!

Baldur’s Gate 3 is a story-rich, party-based RPG set in the universe of Dungeons & Dragons, where your choices shape a tale of fellowship and betrayal, survival and sacrifice, and the lure of absolute power. (Website)

Spoilers

If your post contains any possible spoilers, please:

Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS