210
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 105 points 4 days ago

lol. Wait until a head of lettuce costs $14.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 85 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It'll be because democrats are trying to raise the minimum wage and let trans people be represented in libraries.

/s, cuz I get in trouble for not relaying sarcasm well

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's because sarcasm doesn't work well over text.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 41 points 4 days ago

YOU DON'T WORK WELL OVER TEXT!!!

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 4 days ago
[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago

That's great to hear. Your feedback is important to us! Don't forget to leave a Google review on my mom and the services you enjoyed!

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Is your mom wheelchair accessible? How many people can your mom serve? Are there picnic toilets available at your mom? Do your mom serve alcohol?

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

Was there a queue when you visited last time? Would you consider "fine dining establishment" a good description?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 days ago

It's not a laughing matter. The poors will pay, and the rich people won't notice.

"how much can one banana cost, Michael? Ten dollars?"

[-] xpinchx@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Lol yep the only crops we will get will have to be imported and heavily tariffed. Gg Trump

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 72 points 4 days ago

Would these be the same farmers that voted for Trump? 🤔

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

"Ah sure ahm tired of all the mean tweets, but he tells it like it is!"

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago

Would that be Trump voting farmers?

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago

I live in farm country, and yes these guys are constantly voting republican and complaining endlessly about illegals, they buy into this non sense and they genuinely think it some how magically won't effect them, or that white migrant farm workers are going to magically appear.

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

My wife was born and raised in SE Idaho, potato country. Their tiny hometown has a ton of illegal Hispanics, and ALL the potato farms hire them. But they all vote straight Republicans

These people are fucking stupid.

You know it. They consistently vote against their own best interests.

[-] JoShmoe@ani.social 6 points 4 days ago

They forgot to read the memo

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 46 points 4 days ago

Good, fuck them for voting against their own interest and deport the second-third generatiom Mexicans thar voted for Trump.

[-] ThrowawayInTheYear23@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago

Those are just Mexicans that can swim.

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Well, fuck those Trump farmers.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 days ago

Leopards are going to be eating well the next few years :>

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

Oh don't worry, Trump has a plan to remove minimum wage, so Americans can work the fields. That combined with anti homeless supreme Court rulings means your ass will work the fields for $2 an hour or for free from prison.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I'm fairly certain Trump intends to arrest all the illegal looking folk that he can and then use them as prison labor for all the jobs that they used get paid for.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago

Yeah, if Trump deports all those people, who will we exploit for cheap labor?

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 28 points 4 days ago

To deport someone, the receiving country has to agree to accept them. Mexico will accept their own nationals, and possibly those of some other countries, but they won't accept everyone. What do you do with people who's country refuses to accept them back (this has happened)? And what do you do with them when you can't determine where to send them back to? You've already promised they won't be let loose, so you'll put them into containment facilities - all very hastily-built, because there are so many people you've accumulated so quickly.

But you have more people than you know what to do with, and they're all just idling in the camps, and the nation is desperate for workers. The temptation is too great: instead of spending all this money maintaining the camps, you can offset the expenses by renting them to various industries as cheap labor.

It's still expensive, your people still resent spending money on them, and you still want to deport them, so you don't spend much on food or medicine or clothes or sanitation. Winter comes, disease rips through the camps, and masses die - but that's not your responsibility, these things happen ...

Just a reminder that most of the concentration camps Germany built weren't extermination camps, they were slave labor camps but the administration didn't care if the prisoners died of disease or injury, they'd just round up more people to feed the German machine.

[-] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago

They'll strike a deal with some other country to take them. Then issue contracts for private chartered flights at $10k/person, given to their best buddies.

https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-61782866

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 29 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I'm absolutely opposed to this deportation thing, it's cruel and if anything I feel that we should be encouraging more immigrants to come here, but the "it'll be bad because it'll get rid of all the people who do these jobs american citizens don't want to do" line does sorta gloss over the fact that if the job conditions are so bad that if people have literally any other option the role goes unfilled, something probably needs to be done to improve the conditions of that job, especially if it is as vital as food production.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

You're not wrong but what's a realistic path to accomplishing such a thing? Capitalists want to extract as much money as possible so raising wages or improving working conditions without being forced is out of the question. The only party with even a pretend interest in forcing that discussion just got beat down all over the country. And no one cares enough about the issue to fix it by paying more for food, which would probably still be true if we doubled wages for all jobs.

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 1 points 3 days ago

Realistically it is difficult, I agree, as capitalism doesnt look to be going anywhere and the current environment doesnt seem like one where increased regulation is likely to get passed. Honestly I think the most realistic path to some improvement at the moment is research into automation tech for the kinds of farm roles that currently rely on cheap labor. Not that capitalists wont just take the cost savings and still pay people less, but its at least possible to pay people more without increasing the cost of staples if the available revenue can be spread across fewer more productive workers, and because operating complex machinery and maintaining it take more time to learn, such workers at least might have a better shot at organizing and thereby forcing that wage increase, because their skills could be harder to replace. And because the technology theoretically allows for increased profits, funding developing it might stand a chance at still getting through even current political conditions.

Honestly, that might be required even in a more equitable economic system anyway though, at some level that kind of work seems like it would have pretty slim margins, so even if the profits were distributed fairly, it still might not be enough to make those jobs not terrible.

[-] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Automation of some of the jobs might be possible, but likely still wildly more expensive than paying some immigrant peanuts

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Or you need slaves

Guess which option the pigs will pick

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

History has many examples of how shipping urban intellectuals off to work on farms rids you of said intellectuals and leads to (checks notes) mass starvation. Since that’s the worst possible outcome, I imagine he’s going to go with that.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago

Is it you and me? I bet it's you and me.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well I'm hoping white people but we know how well that worked in Georgia and Arizona, we found out they're just too soft to work those jobs despite being told they would be taking their jerb back

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

The migrant workers are often subjected to working conditions that would violate federal worker protection laws, but because they are in the country illegally, they don't report the poor working conditions out of fear. That's exploitation, through and through. No worker should be expected to tolerate such poor treatment, regardless of skin color.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

These companies depend on immigrant labor... Will they stand idly by while government takes away their exploitable pool of undocumented immigrants?

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Likely not, but Trumpism is very quid pro quo based, so those companies that have the means to gain favor with Trump might be able to keep their laborers or gain exclusive rights to immigrant laborers. The smaller companies will be sacrificed in this regard.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

There you go. It will be a boon for the prison industrial complex. God bless capitalism.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Prison stock prices have soared since the election.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago

The FO phase can finally begin

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

It happened in 2016 and they found out and they went back to the trough for more toadstool.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago

This is the rare FA[FAFO]FO.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Let's see how the Florida's harder stance on immigration is going after a couple years:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-immigration-law-significant-unintended-consequences/

"Rogelio Rauda, an undocumented worker from Honduras doing construction in Crystal River, Florida, says only eight workers he knows came to the disaster zone out of the hundreds he says typically show up."

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/26/1242236604/florida-economy-immigration-businesses-workers-undocumented

"Hetrick says what Florida is facing is symbolic of the larger reality in the country — where there is an aging population and politicians framing immigration as a threat rather than fixing a broken system."

Yep

[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 19 points 4 days ago

Let the face eating begin!

[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Isn't that why Musk paid his way in? He's going to push his Optimus robots to do this work and he'll make all his money back that he lost on Twitter.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

You mean those laughable robots unworthy of the name that are 20 years behind Boston dynamics and still require an operator to actually do anything at all?

Yeah, that is going to happen just as much as the hyper loop is going to happen. And the missions to Mars. And the full self driving.

Musk is full of shit, always has been. He's a scammer who got incredibly lucky and from there on just floated up on his bullshit that Musk boys lapped up like honey.

[-] TechAnon@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, those are the ones I'm referring to. I agree they suck and are years behind Boston Dynamics. With that said, a lot of things are happening that I didn't think would happen so I stand by my prediction.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
210 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS