116

Do you agree with this or not?

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 84 points 1 day ago

Brexit never made sense.

Nothing has changed.

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago

Honestly, IMO Britain needs to just let go of this 'special relationship' nonsense with the US that we seem to think we have. It only applies when the US wants us to join in one of their wars, or hassle Europe about something which we can't even do properly anymore since we left the EU. Otherwise the US really doesn't give two shits about what we're doing.

We're a European country, not an American state. We should act as such and move closer to being part of Europe, instead of trying to suck up to an isolationist powder-keg on the other side of the world. (Which I'm assuming will be the case once the MAGAs are in charge.)

[-] Chuymatt@beehaw.org 5 points 23 hours ago

The world needs to just shun him and his appointees. I wish the world leaders would just completely divest themselves from the US involvement. Just let us stew in it all.

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Not an American state.

You’re right, you’re not an American state. Shit, you’re not even an American commonwealth. You’re a vassal state lmao.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Not British, but this was a terrible move on Britain side and fell right into what Kremlin wanted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics#Content

(Notice that this book was published in 1997)

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 25 points 1 day ago

Brexit makes no sense in any world.

Except the one invented in Farage etcs brain farts.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Fucktards on both sides of the Atlantic giving Putin exactly what he wants.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Yup, 100%. Labour should finally grow a pair and take the UK back into EU.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago

Yes, the majority of Brexitiers are from former UKIP and Conservative ranks. But I'm constantly surprised how people don't understand that a sizeable minority of Labour voters pushed Brexit over the line. These are Labour voters that the party still wants to court.

Labour isn't going to grow a pair. Because growing a pair would send them straight out of office after they fought so hard to get back in.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 4 points 21 hours ago

That is the realpolitik. But as the demographic moves on, and anyone able to change their mind looks how it has turned out, we calls to rejoin in some form will be overwhelming.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 20 hours ago

I agree. I just don't think it will be that way for a good ten years or more.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Yes, because pandering to racists ended so well in Germany before the ww2. Oh, hold on...

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 20 hours ago

No, I'm sorry, you don't simply dismiss views that you don't hold as being Nazi racist. That's cheap and does nothing to persuade Labour Brexit voters from rethinking their opposition to the EU. A lot of them feel (felt) that their livelihoods were being constantly threatened by a race to the bottom for cheap labour imported by freedom of movement. The unions were pretty vocal about wanting more state intervention and subsidies that, they felt, were not permitted under EU law.

Now what you need to do is tackle these questions head on and convince these Labour Brexit voters that this isn't the case. How does a modern Labour party show that these voters haven't been left behind by EU integration. Calling them Nazis just alienates them and, guess what, causes a crushing defeat to Boris Fucking Johnson.

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

No, I'm sorry, you don't simply dismiss views that you don't hold as being Nazi racist

I don't. There were in fact 3 groups of people who voted for Brexshit:

  1. Racists
  2. Idiots
  3. Total cunts.

Groups 1&2 overlapped to large extent. Group 3 was relatively small: tax dodging businessmen, Tory politicians etc.

One shouldn't pander to neither. People need to be educated (group 2) or compulsorily reeducated (group 1).

Group 3 should end up in prisons after the law is changed to make public lies with a intention to mislead the public a criminal offence.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 0 points 8 hours ago

There were in fact 3 groups of people who voted for Brexshit:

  1. Racists
  2. Idiots
  3. Total cunts.

As a strategy to reverse Brexit and win round people that voted for it, let me break it to you, calling them racist idiot cunts isn't going to work.

Group 3 should end up in prisons

🫠

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

I don't give a fuck what racists and idiots think so there is that.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago

But it sounds like you think anyone that disagrees with you is a racist idiot? And if you're serious about reversing Brexit you're going to have to convince people you disagree with that it is in their best interests. Calling them racist idiots is bad way to do that. Do you see that? Or you still don't care about reversing Brexit?

I'm not sure you understand correctly.

The options outlined above are pander to racists or have racists in charge.

Although I can concur, either way we're probably fucked.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It makes the assumption that we could do that.

There's no certainty that another referendum would be in favour of rejoining. Most people have bigger problems than the green line not going up quite as fast or Tarquin not being able to do erasmus. If anything so little changing after brexit for the vast majority of people has just cemented the idea that we don't need the EU. The prospect of getting drafted into WWIII is hardly going to help.

Taking us back in without another referendum is theoretically a possibility. It could provoke a backlash at the next election though, so even if they pushed it through before then we could just end up with Farage as our next PM and leaving again. The EU would hopefully realise this and not let it happen, since it would be a massive pain for everyone.

Even if you had another referendum, and it was in favour of rejoining, if it was just a slim margin again, are we going to want to rejoin, and will the EU want us rejoining, given the very likely prospect of calls for a third referendum?

Without the EU giving us some kind of deal more favourable than we had before (which is unlikely), or some kind of structural reform of the EU, it's doubtful.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

more favourable than we had before

UK literally got the best deal in the history of countries joining the EU. And they are supposed to get even more? I don't see that happening.

[-] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Cute that you think that Brexit will stop your involvement in WWIII.

[-] Kraiden@kbin.earth 9 points 1 day ago

So serious question. Would the EU even allow Britain back in at this point? I imagine the terms would be much less favourable if they did. I imagine the pound wouldn't be allowed anymore for a start. You want back in? Adopt the euro.

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

I think you could make the argument that Britain rejoining makes the EU look good - if the UK leaves and does better, it might give other countries the idea that they'll be better off leaving too. But if the UK changes its mind and comes back after not even 10 years of being out, it might send the message to others that you're better off staying the course.

Especially if we're willing to come back for a worse deal than we had before we left, which I'd assume would be the case. We pissed away an amazing position within the EU, I'd be very surprised if they were willing to let us just plop back into our old role.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Would the EU even allow Britain back in at this point?

Can only guess. But If they even considered it. I expect they would want a clear majority vote. 66% or above would be my guess.

I imagine the terms would be much less favourable if they did

Likely the same as any new nation joining.

I imagine the pound wouldn’t be allowed anymore for a start. You want back in? Adopt the euro.

Like many new nations joining. That would be less simple. As Joining the Euro has economic requirements. I can actually see the UK promising to adopt the Euro one day. Then never really working to do anything beyond accept it in the UK along with GPB. Because joining the Euro is always an eventual requirement for new nations, rather than an immediate one. If Europeans can spend euros in the UK. I can't actually see the EU forcing the UK to join any time soon.

That is of course ignoring point one is unlikely to happen.

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah the Euro thing is a bit of a Catch-22 I think - if a Labour government agrees to adopt the Euro, the Tories and the press will absolutely tear them to pieces, and we'll probably end up with a Tory government again, bleating on about how they "Saved our pound" or whatever.

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Adopt the Euro, dispense with the monarchy, enrol in a European Defence Force.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago

Assuming a true vote. Rather than one filled with false claims. (yeah, that ain't going to happen)

Dispense with the monarchy is likely the only one unlikely to win.

While, numbers are way higher than in the past. Distrust of UK democracy still means well under 50% are comfortable with any proposed replacement. So much like brexit. Without multiple incompatible offers to replace. A vote to end our current system will fail.

And honestly, as a nation, those most opposed to the system are not those most likely to fall for the false claims of a new one.

Basically post UK history with republics. (1690s) And recent distrust in politicians. You need to agree and sell the replacement before removing the current system.

[-] Baggins@feddit.uk 1 points 14 hours ago

Oh I doubt it'll ever happen in my lifetime, at 67 I've probably only got 20 or 30 years left anyway. But maybe my daughter will be part of a united European state.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago

I wish her the best.

Honestly, back in the 80-90s I had the same wish. And in the late 90s honestly thought we were heading that way.

Son is now 34. Honestly question if he will live long enough.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, please come back!

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Nothing makes sense anymore.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
116 points (96.8% liked)

UK Politics

3111 readers
368 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS