270

Summary

Despite Donald Trump’s promise to avoid Social Security cuts, recent signals from the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, suggest reductions may be forthcoming.

The department, aimed at streamlining federal spending, has sparked concern among advocates worried about potential impacts on the program.

Trump’s mixed messaging and DOGE’s focus on cost-cutting have intensified scrutiny as officials prepare policy recommendations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

Go ahead, ya swarmy fucks. You think a CEO denying healthcare is the last high profile death, take the last of everything, from those who have so little, and no bunker or hired goons will save you. Mark my words, when backed against a wall, they will lose. History has proven that over and over again.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 96 points 3 days ago

Thats our money. We paid into it. They are stealing from us.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is the correct take away. They’re using it to fund further tax cuts to the wealthy.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

I wonder if we can sue them for taking this from us. I mean, I been paying into that for twelve fucken years. A lot of others have put a lot more in.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 32 points 3 days ago

Two wealthy billionaire immigrants hired to pilfer American livelihood because the Government borrowed and bet from our Social Security— and lost the money. Now they see no other way out of insolvency.

Certainly Elon and Vivek aren’t going to start paying their fair share of taxes, so it’s steal from the poor and give to the rich.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer 19 points 3 days ago

All rich people steal. This is nothing new.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Stealing is how the very richest got rich.

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

It gets so tiring to hear over and over and over again that the only way to solve the budget problems is through austerity. You know there is another side that can help with reducing a deficit called taxes? Specifically taxing billionaires. But it seems that only the poor must suffer when making things more efficient.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Taxing billionaires makes sense and would work well to solve all sorts of problems. But the billionaires own the government and the politicians.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

That can change. And as an emergency measure, we should asset-strip every single one of them.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I love the idea of the "austerity" of billionaires being cut down to size and having to live on "only" $999 million as Bernie proposed - tax anything over that at 100%.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

You fuckers got Musk as a politician now.

He’s even posing for pictures with his kid. The only one dumb enough still to not fucking hate him.

America is a meme state at this point

[-] Laser@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

He’s even posing for pictures with his kid. The only one dumb enough still to not fucking hate him.

Oh, the child has nothing to do with posing, he's just afraid for his life since the UHC CEO got shot and hopes having a child around is a detriment

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

We live in the stupidest timeline.

[-] Pyrin@kbin.melroy.org 51 points 3 days ago

To all old voters who wanted Trump: HA!! HA!! HA!!

Enjoy your sentencing from this clown.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

It won’t hit the elderly, they’ll cut based on current age. It’s anyone under 40 that’ll be fucked.

[-] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Oh good, that's me. 9/11 in middle school, wars through high school, '08 housing crash in the middle of college which pushed me to pivot to an AA instead of bachelor's, COVID wedding at 31, insane inflation through now. We finally bought our first house a few months ago and I turned 36 a few days ago. Things were starting to seem like they might turn out okay after all. Serves me right for having a whisper of optimism in my brain for once.

Pensions in this country are nearly non-existent. Without social security either, only the wealthy can retire. Thankfully, I've had retirement accounts for years, but they'll be wiped out by the first late life medical emergency I experience. Without social security to look forward to, I think a lot of people would rather live through total societal collapse than give their everything just to prop up this system that gives nothing back. It's a bad fucking deal.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 40 points 3 days ago

Go ahead. Fuck with people's money, or expectations of money. See how far that gets you. Culture wars are one thing, and don't affect everyone, but cold hard cash is very real to most people. I fucking dare them.

[-] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 days ago

We’re starving and CEOs are back on the menu.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 days ago

Wait, is he using his kid as a human shield now? Not one time has he been holding a child now suddenly it's part of his wardrobe. Lmfao.

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah, he's a real piece of shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

A government being "led" by fucking internet trolls. This is what the world has come to.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

Where's Mario Mangione to take care of the problem?

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

So they charge us for social securityin our paychecks for our entire lives, just to take our money away before we can retire, and just keep what they took.

[-] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

The writing has been on the wall for a while now. All retirement planning I've done is based on the assumption that SSA won't be around by the time I retire. The fact that we can't even remove the taxable maximum to retain some degree of financial solvency is proof enough.

I think the most likely course of action is that we will get some portion of our contributions back, but not the full amount. I just hope that they don't raise the retirement age so much to try to retain the illusion of being able to get a full payout. I'd rather get a fraction of my contributions back at 67 than need to risk living to a much older age but receiving full benefits.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

They can do it and get sued, the fact is people who paid into it expecting to make use of the program were stolen from if they cut it. The govt. needs to stop being a bitch and tax the wealthy.

[-] oyo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Yup, it's such a lie that SS and Medicare are socialist "entitlements." We're entitled to them because we fucking paid for them.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

The first government pension system was implemented by that arch-conservative Bismarck.

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Imminent domain and civil asset forfeiture are the government stealing your shit and telling you to get fucked. You think it won't be the same for social security?

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago

Good luck with that under the Orange Idiotn and his shit chugging sycophants. As a disabled person who needs SSDI to live, I'd join that lawsuit in a nanosecond.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I just hope they do it fast enough for my parents to feel the acute effects... I don't know any other way to possibly snap them out of this.

[-] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 9 points 2 days ago

We all know they will just blame the left somehow.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Always the same:

Shitty thing they’re rumored to be planning to do: oh, we’re not going to do that. 6 months later, press finds out they’re planning to do just that.

Good thing they say they’re going to do: never happens. They’ll keep saying they’re gonna, though. Planning to make a plan to plan the good thing.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Rape and pillage. This is all these human pieces of absolute garbage know.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

The fact that this implies that they are comparable to the Vandals, Vikings, or Mongols is an insult said ancient raiders and pillagers.

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Time to start stocking up on riot supplies.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Like anyone will even care about what’s happening to them?

Just look at recent surveys, where economic sentiment is basically political opinion now, not how people are actually fairing: https://www.axios.com/2024/12/06/trump-economy-democrats-republicans-inflation

The metric was not like that before.

But we are in an era where influencers, feeds and whims trump reality and fact. I thought COVID-19 proved that, but it’s pretty much irrefutable now, and people (on average) are going to care less about what’s physically taken away than how some angry influencer makes them feel about it.

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Maybe people will start to pay attention when their retirements are stolen from them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

That's a pretty Brian Thompson thing to do.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

Fine. But pay me back what I paid into it the past 30 years along with its gains.

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Eh, I don’t even know how to feel now.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Why not? You've presumably been paying into a system your whole working life that is going to be stolen from you. You don't know how to feel about that?

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

We’ll wait and see if these fools actually pull it off.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Can I opt out of paying SS taxes? Haha.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Depends, what's your net worth?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
270 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19202 readers
2478 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS