644
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] someguy@pleroma.someotherguy.xyz 227 points 2 weeks ago

@return2ozma @technology
10 years ago, the Feds wanted backdoors to all of phones so they could read all of our text messages. Now, the Feds want everyone not to use software that has backdoors so the Chinese cannot read our phones. The Feds don't want competition.

[-] Godnroc@lemmy.world 108 points 2 weeks ago

The backdoors they use are there for freedom and justice, the backdoors the "others" use are tools of evil and security risks!

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 weeks ago

"They're the same picture"

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

Why do you hate America’s children?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 12 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely. They were so arrogant they never thought it would happen to us. After all, we are in charge of our own networks so why would we expect the enemy to be at the gates? Let's make those gates out of cardboard so it's easier to spy on everyone.

Of course then you have things like CALEA mandating a back door, you have cheap telecom companies that will happily buy cheap lowest bidder Chinese hardware and install it "everywhere* without concern for security (after all, it's not their data being stolen) and now the enemy isn't just at the gates but inside the walls.

A decade ago, making sure the feds could read everyone's mail was the national security priority. Suddenly when the Chinese can read everyone's mail, good security is the national security priority.

It's too bad there was no way to predict this in advance. Oh wait...

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 110 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Why the hell is this in 4K HDR?

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 13 points 2 weeks ago

Only the best for the worst hack in history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 106 points 2 weeks ago

NIST has been saying since 2016 not to use SMS for MFA. It's always been horribly insecure.

[-] Routhinator@startrek.website 69 points 2 weeks ago

The problem for me is that most Canadian Banks give you the choice of SMS or their shitty adware filled bank app that relies on Google Play Services and wont implement TOTP so I can use a true MFA app. And Im done with being forced to accept user policies I don't agree with to do shit, and most of all done with Google Play Services on my device 😑

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago

Adding to this that my Canadian bank just updated their app and it doesn't work with my older phone. So my only option is to use online services with SMS/call verification.

It's such a joy to know that my bank, who made $40.670 billion last year, takes care of every customer equally.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

This is the main reason I switched to Fidelity here in the US. It's a brokerage, but it does basic bank things, like checks, debit card, etc, and they support SymantecVIP, which works w/o Google Play Services. TOTP support really isn't that hard, I don't understand why banks are so slow in adopting it...

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

The issue is, banks are only going to do what they're required to do by law. The government is run by dinosaurs who don't know what computers are, let alone what TOTP is.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

No, they're only going to do what they're required to do by their insurance. The law is an option, but if insurance costs go way up if they don't have proper MFA, they'll get MFA.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] oldfart@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

My bank prides itself being the first in the country to support yubikeys for 2fa. I was so happy until i learned it's just for logging in, transactions are still confirmed by SMS or their app. And security experts all say it's better this way, using a regular 2fa solution would be insecure because you wouldn't know what you're confirming.

There really is no hope.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] rarbg@lemmy.zip 67 points 2 weeks ago

Oh man it sure would be nice if the feds had the power to regulate something like this /s

[-] da_peda@lemmings.world 56 points 2 weeks ago

They did. That's the reason for this hack, they wanted Lawful Interception, they got their backdoor. It's what professionals and privacy advocates said all along, if it exists it will be abused.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 66 points 2 weeks ago

Been saying that for years. It's about damn time.

[-] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

SMS spoofing and SIM swapping have been around for ages. It was never secure and that's always been known. The number of companies that rely on it despite sending me a zillion other fucking useless emails is too damn high! Email, or better yet, an authenticator app, are far more secure. Not perfect, but better.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh it turns out we needed NSA to do its actual fucking job after all rather than holding onto exploits for the surveillance state.

Now — for the second time — we have an adversarial administration eager to weaponize government departments while Americans are vulnerable. Why? Because America is the good guys and would never abuse its extrajudicial powers (say, by detaining, rendering and torturing Americans with names similar to those of POIs.)

We could have had twenty-four years of robust communications security developments if NSA didnt sell the public out like Judas.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] archchan@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 weeks ago

I hate forced 2FA that you can't disable anyway. I don't want to waste time waiting for an insecure text, I don't want to input an unencrypted code you sent to my email, I don't want to click your damn notification that runs through Play Services, and no I'm not enrolling in passwordless auth. I don't need to be babied into securing my accounts. Any account I do actively and willingly secure is already using TOTP. Let me put in my username and password, then kindly fuck off.

[-] Charlatan@lemm.ee 21 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. So you, myself, and some others are the exception to the rule. But, you can't look at it that way because its a 'lowest common denominator' problem. The least secure of us means we are all only as secure. Others need to be hand held.

It's definitely time to raise all boats and drop SMS 2fa like a hot rock.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 37 points 2 weeks ago

in other news grass is green

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

Authentication for my work email: Enter 28 character password, receive sms, enter message, log in

Authentication for my Battle.net account:

-Enter email made before 2000 because they don't let you change email

-Enter password

-Get rejected

-Solve CAPTCHA

-Try backup passwords, get rejected

-Request new password

-Send request to 24 year old email

-Try to log on to 24 year old email, email is suspicious and sends Authentication request to my newer email

-Open newer email, Authenticate older email

-open old email, Put in code to battle.net

-Battle.net requests Authenticator code from Battle.net app

-Open battle.net app (no requests)

-Try manual code, doesn't work

  • Realize Battle.net app Authenticator not connected

-Try to connect Battle.net app Authenticator to account

-Realize you cannot connect Authenticator without signing in AND signing in requires Authenticator

-Close Battle.net app

-Open Blizzard Authenticator

-Close warning that this app got depreciated in January

-Enter manual code

-it works

-Attempt to change password to password I first attempted

-Won't let me use same password

-Try logging in using that password

-Still doesn't work - Solve one more CAPTCHA

-Change password to backup password and back to original password - have to solve 2 more Captchas

-Finally works

-Log in

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

Always has been

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't this happen quite awhile ago? I don't see anything new in this article

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 52 points 2 weeks ago

The novelty is the fact that it's ongoing. They haven't mitigated the hack. The threat actors are still inside the networks, which is why the government is telling people to switch to E2EE apps.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thank god, give me my HMAC hash please.

Nothing more terrifying than losing your phone number these days because of all the accounts tied to it via 2FA.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 weeks ago

of course it is. forced 2fa BY SMS OF ALL THINGS is one of the stupidest ideas

[-] capital@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I assume businesses only jumped at the chance to enable SMS 2FA to get their greedy little fingers on our phone numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The end of an era.

Or actually, probably not until we redo whole cellular phone technology works and kick out all the bad actors using SS7 vulnerabilities for stuff like spoofing numbers and stealing messages. We really shouldn't be using a 45 year old system for almost all communications.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] communism@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 weeks ago

I wish Signal stopped using it. I know you can set a Signal PIN but a lot of the non-techy friends I speak to on Signal probably wouldn't think to, or look through the settings (not that you need to be "techy" to set it, but you know the kind of learned helplessness most people have about tech). At least a prompt for all users to set an account PIN so their account can't just be stolen by anyone with their SIM card.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago

I thought they abandoned SMS a couple years ago??

[-] ChillPill@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

They abandoned letting you use the Signal app to send and recieve SMS. You still need to get a code via SMS to activate your Signal account. I believe this is what they are referring to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Since when was sms ever secure? My understanding is that messages are sent in the clear, meaning your carrier and the recipient's carrier both have the opportunity to intercept messages.

I mean that's the message content, not the authentication, but still, sms is the opposite of secure, always has been.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

Hollywood hacking has nothing on real hacking it seems.

New Clipper Chip mandatory in new phones for "security" 😉

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigLime@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

I coulda told you that for free. And sooner

[-] Edieto12@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

id take email Authentication over sms Authentication if there was only them 2 let me use my 2facter app for the love of god plz i hate how banks use sms its like come on man

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So many services still don't even offer 2FA at all. Any service that stores payment information and PII without any 2FA options, let alone a secure one, at this point are a disgrace.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
644 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60281 readers
3346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS