460
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by wesker to c/modabuse

For the record I was posting in support of inclusive language, but pointing out that context and convention matter.

They seem to have even scrubbed my comment from their instance, lol.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah. Saying anything that isn't overwhelmingly supportive of transpeople is just asking to be mod abused.

Unfortunate world we live in, but thanks for fighting back.

[-] parpol@programming.dev 105 points 2 weeks ago

Blahaj mods (especially the one modding ghazi, transgender and 196) are the worst kind of mods. They promote blatant misinformation, remove posts calling said misinformation out, and they ban people and label them transphobes despite there being no transphobic words or implications whatsoever in your comments.

Just block the entire instance and move on. There are better instances that better represent the lgbt community.

Source: my ban message is the same as yours, and I have never said or implied anything remotely transphobic.

[-] wesker 59 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What I hate about blocking instances is that I no longer seem to get inbox notifications when a member of the instance comments on something in response to me, outside of that instance.

Like, my beef isn't with blahaj users, and I don't want to unintentionally ignore them because their admin/s are nutballs.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 36 points 2 weeks ago

Unless it’s hexbear in which case the users are also nuts

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 84 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine going out of your way to mod based on shit posted else where.

I have been saying this... We have too much modding for no fucking reason.

We literally got 50k AMU, and half the modding is based on vibes, I don't like the tone or content of the comments

As if there is not enough real modding to go around lol

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

I have been saying this… We have too much modding for no fucking reason.

This should open up an opportunity for people who don't support mod abuse to create communities that don't enable it.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 4 days ago

I am unfit for positions of authority but point taken

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 27 points 2 weeks ago

The mod to user ratio in some of the communities is way out of whack. Just start with one mod who does nothing except manage spam and actual harmful content posted explicitly to be harmful. If the community ever grows so much that more mods are required, add only as needed and not more. And do the absolute minimum to make the community a good place to be, so it has a chance to grow and flourish.

What I'm saying is mod in moderation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pmjv 71 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

From the Book of the Dude, the holy book of the Dudeism religion:

Incidentally, the term “dude” is commonly agreed to refer to all genders. Most linguists contend that the diminutive “dudette” is not in keeping with the parlance of our times.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 69 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't be a leftist platform if they didn't spend the majority of their time and effort self policing based on their purity tests instead of doing something actually productive

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

The People's Front of Judea vs the Judean People's Front!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes, yea!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Not to everyone, and that's cool, until someone tells you not to call them dude anymore. Then your an asshole if you try to argue the gender neutrality of the term dude. Such as telling someone to get over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[-] hightrix@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago

Wow. That is about the tamest comment that’s ever gotten someone banned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

I'm just glad I'm not the only one who views dude as androgynous.

I thought I was one of the few.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was once told my choice of defaulting to referring to people as they/them is offensive to nonbinary people. I don't necessarily know your pronouns at that particular instance of time when speaking, and being offensive is not my intention, but it seems to happen anyway.

Which is why I call they/them the equal oppurtunity offender. It doesn't discriminate in its neutralness.

Wait until they hear what non-binary sounds like in Spanish, a language that genders every noun as either male or female.

[-] DrPop@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

At least from one Non Binary, I default they/them and have no idea why I personally would find it offensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 40 points 2 weeks ago

They could not in fact get over it, dude.

They must feel very strongly about the word dude. I'm in your camp on it. It's an exclamation, nothing more 🤷

[-] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 36 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The key is that you said "but..." which in some communities fails the test of absolute 100% agreement and makes you The Enemy. I had a very similar experience there, in my case it was saying someone who is "uncomfortable" with gender issues might not actually "hate" anybody, they could just be having trouble overcoming how they were raised. But in the end it's like if a TV channel stops but you get thousands of other channels, so oh well .

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 36 points 2 weeks ago

Joke’s on them, I’ve shadow banned them.

[-] schwim@lemm.ee 30 points 2 weeks ago

Consider the source of the action(a person pursuing a position of authority on a relatively miniscule network) and keep on keeping on. Decades of forums moderated by basement dwellers with a Napoleon complex have made it hard for me to take things like this seriously.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SmAOBbUiZcY

[-] CanadaPlus 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Wow, somebody that day was salty, and pretty much just looking for a comment to get mad about.

There's another FOSS project idea: a bot that detects Lemmy bans and sends you a notification about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Delirioum@programming.dev 25 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think there is anything like a shadow ban on Lemmy?

[-] wesker 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It seems to be an unintentional side effect, that ends up being similar to a shadow ban.

What I mean to say is that I can still make comments on blahaj posts, but they will never show up to users of their instance. So, to me, it seems like everything is okay, when in reality, I've probably been commenting into the ether for 10 mo.

Example:

https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/16663205

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 25 points 2 weeks ago

Blahaj is essentially the padded room of Lemmy. The users there never ever ever want to see a difference in opinion, a naughty word, or a thought provoking comment. They want to be victims and talk about cute stuff. Completely within their rights to make their instance the most cringe thing on the Internet and yet another example of leftists fighting other leftists and pointing fingers at one another over minor issues while conservatives actually are exterminating minorities at record pace and creating laws and regulations to destroy lives. It might be funny if it wasn't so sad.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] abfarid@startrek.website 24 points 2 weeks ago

I have also been banned from specifically 196 for a comment on a completely different instance. Reason: Transphobe. Because I was asking questions.

And it's kind of annoying that when I scroll through the feed, upvote a post and get an error. Oh it's a blahaj post... Sometimes I realize after I've finished writing a comment and can't send it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Alice@hilariouschaos.com 23 points 2 weeks ago

That's what makes Lemmy lame honestly

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

Lmao they banned me for saying we shouldn't let trump get elected, the blahaj mods are awful

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

Where would I see if I've been banned somewhere? I usually browse /all so I'm sure I've commented and voted most everywhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

I was banned from a community called, "Pleasant Politics," that I had never heard of or interacted with, but honestly, as a preemptive move, fair enough.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I got banned from lemmy.world/c/linuxsucks, which is one person's mental illness, so who cares? Doesn't stop me from calling them an idiot when they show up elsewhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
460 points (92.8% liked)

Mod Abuse Hotline

96 readers
2 users here now

A safe space to report and discuss the daily abuses of power that occur on the Lemmy.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS