this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
451 points (98.3% liked)

theyknew

771 readers
1 users here now

Pictures created by people who knew full well how they could be interpreted. For pictures to fit in here there needs to be an element of plausible deniability, although it can be a tenuous one...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Personally this doesn't feel like true theyknew material, because this is one of those "this is how they had to advertise because nobody would allow them to say the real purpose of the items" rather than "suggestive thing presented as normal with a lot of rib-to-elbow action and stifled giggles behind the scenes, often hidden from management"

It's one of those "it fits the literal definition but not the spirit" situations. Idk Maybe it's just me.

It'll never not be funny though

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In India they’re still advertised exactly like this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right, Chief.

And that sort of thing had been commonplace since the Victorian times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SScVqAytfHU&t=405

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Video is geoblocked but I'm assuming that's a hole for carrying your axe close to your groin?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Contoured to use comfortably around eyes, brows, chin and other parts of the body

Wasn't this supposed to be a facial massager, sir?

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gentle, penetrating massage

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"...About seven inches long..."

[–] illi@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

High impact plastic...

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Perfect size for most "purses"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

What is "Overheard in the ED more often than anyone'd like to know"?

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Two C batteries? That thing is a beast.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Nah, things were much less energy efficient back then.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I actually wish more devices used C and D batteries as those last longer.

I especially hate when a device uses AAA batteries when AA would easily fit.

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My stylus uses AAAA batteries which was the same exact sound I made when AAAs didn’t fit inside.

Also fun fact inside of a 9V is a bunch of AAAAs you can pop out because who the fuck keeps AAAAs on hand

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What?? I refuse to believe the blocky 9V is just a few AAAAs in a trenchcoat.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] 7uWqKj@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Well, it is. 6 cells of 1.5 V each, wired in series. That’s also why the 9 V block has both poles on the same side.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Last few I've pulled apart contained a stack of 6 oblong, coin shaped batteries. Disappoint.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I think they meant girthy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 16 points 1 month ago

In case madame needs to pour some concrete in a pinch and has to remove any air bubbles

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The size of the battery only adds capacity, not power. You gotta increase voltage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Actually not really. Even the D type batteries would have smaller circumference than the average.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I meant more in terms of longevity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

I feel bad for the people who bought them and never thought to use them anywhere other than their face.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Contoured to use comfortably around eyes, brows, chin and other parts of the body.

Gentle penetrating massage.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I dunno if I'd chance it - I heard you can poke your eye out with one of those things...

Nah, it penetrates gently. It's in the advert.

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

All I see is that it costs 4,99

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think that hairstyle was popular in the mid-1960s - if I'm right, that's roughly $50 in today's money.

Edit: source is https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ using the year 1965, and the official US government inflation calculator seems to concur.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Im guessing the year is 1970. That $5 is equivalent to $31 now.

Bought right for a cheap, but otherwise quality vibrator.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are Aliexpress vibrators roughly that price right now. They probably break right away, and the plastic is questionable to insert into the human body, but they exist.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Plastic from that era probably has the same descriptors.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would sure be traumatizing, if I just remembered finding this facial massager with a bunch of oddly interesting magazines next to my parents bed, when I was a young boy...

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure would be. It was traumatizing enough asking my mother what a minstrel is, and getting a detailed explanation of menstruation instead. Too soon, mom!

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

wife-hack of the 50s

[–] propter_hog@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

and other parts of the body

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

I’m pretty sure I bought a baby blue one for my gf 18 years ago.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 7 points 1 month ago

Sorry, I'm so American that the only thing I can see is a bullet.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do we still have products that use completely different advertising on purpose like this ?

[–] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think the Hitachi Magic Wand advertises (or rather used to advertise the last time I looked at it) itself as a muscle massager and doesn't mention anything sexual.

But it's probably the most popular wand vibrator people use

[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Because it was created and sold as a massager not a sex toy and it wasn’t intended to be used in anything sex related, but people used it for sex stuff and it is what popularised the product.

Hitachi rebranded it dropping the company name from the product.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

at first I was like "wow 5 dollars it's amazing how inflation hasn't really done much to that" and then I was like "oh yeah.... slaves..."

[–] Today@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Possible explanation for my husband's "don't chip your teeth" jokes?

load more comments
view more: next ›