243
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 3 hours ago

There ya go...

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 32 points 8 hours ago

It's disturbing that I kinda miss the pre-USB days when, if the cable matched the port physically, it also matched the port in terms of capabilities (unless someone was doing something deliberately stupid). At least that meant you knew right away whether you had the right cable or not.

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

USB-C has been a blessing and curse. One port that does everything, except when it doesn't. Even charging is now complicated by the "guess the cable that supports the right PD type" game.

Not that the old days were much better. I don't miss faffing around with the myriad of serial and parallel port modes and settings.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

PD cables aren't expensive enough to just buy good ones have them for all your chargers.

[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Wasnt the parallel port also used for serial for awhile? Not quite perfect but better than now I suppose.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Although serial and parallel shared the same overall pin count and connector style, they used opposite genders and the two were incompatible.

Generally, If the port on the PC was male it was serial if the port was female it was parallel. But realistically you'd never see a 25-pin serial on a computer unless you were looking at something very ancient and strange. Even back into the '80s, The PCs used DB9 connectors for serial and adapters or the cable itself would have to convert it over the standard 25 pin connector on the modems.

[-] freeman@feddit.org 59 points 14 hours ago
[-] lengau@midwest.social 8 points 11 hours ago

I was going to say... I've had a cable with that logo on it for over a year.

[-] moseschrute@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Did the logo fix everything?

[-] lengau@midwest.social 2 points 1 hour ago

Well i still can't get the dock that came with it to output to multiple 4k monitors (even though it's supposed to be able to), so...

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 143 points 17 hours ago

USB C Pro Max SuperSpeed Venti Extreme

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Featuring Dante from the Devil May Cry Series and New Funky Mode

[-] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 6 hours ago

If each of those things actually mean something that tells me about the potential connection, I'm all for it.

As it stands, the symbols and colors are adopted at random.

[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago

It mutilates your data

[-] loie@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago
[-] finley@lemm.ee 20 points 16 hours ago
[-] Peffse@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago
[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

You forgot the ".2"

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Still the same as the 3.0.

[-] Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee 73 points 17 hours ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 40 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Now the EU needs to make it a legal requirement that every cable sold includes an engraving of the speed and watts on both ends.

The fact this dogshit continued for so long is unforgivable. Capitalism is most efficient my ass. It's like the USB specs naming convention was outsourced to the dumbest, most illiterate engineers alive.

On second thought, the profit motive indicates the naming convention was probably done to intentionally create confusion and sell more cables.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 24 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Fine by me, as long as the Bluetooth logo is never changed. Long live King Harald Gormsson, the unifier!

[-] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 31 points 17 hours ago

Took long enough for someone over there to figure out they made some mistakes with recent branding. Glad they've finally made some positive changes for end users though.

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ultimately, it's great that users won't need to squint to read the fine print or cross-reference spec sheets once the labels gain popularity.

I can't even read the labels on the cables in the article photos.

EDIT: I get it, you all have 20/10 vision and no astigmatism, thanks for your input.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 32 points 16 hours ago

Reality has a higher resolution than this potato photo.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 16 hours ago

I can't even read the labels on the cables in the article photos.

...Because the image is crappy resolution, its like complaining you can't read without your glasses on.

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

That bottom one looks embossed instead of printed. At the size of a USB-C cable plug, that's going to be difficult to read outside of ideal lighting conditions.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 15 hours ago

That's still significantly better than having no markings at all.

[-] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

It's a sample product packaging that has Lorem ipsum on it

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

The cable, not the package

[-] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago

It says 80G 240W, so it's a max speed max wattage spec cable. Not that hard to read even with the low res image really, but that's on techspot for compressing things

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

I'll believe it when I see it

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

Can’t wait for all the crapware to flood the market and slap that 80gbps logo on anything and everything

[-] Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm waiting for the ones that'll just go zany and put "100GBps" or "100+ GBps!".

Because you know they will do that too.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 14 points 17 hours ago
[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 40 points 17 hours ago

This isn't that. It's relabeling the existing USB standards in a way that actually makes sense finally.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 23 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, but the old labels won't just magically disappear. Tech folks might know how to handle it but for everyone else it will be just more of the same. As far as they care for labeling to begin with.

[-] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 16 hours ago

I think this time the manufacturers will be pretty quick at adopting the new branding; if there's two competing devices next to each other, one marked with "USB 3.2 Gen 2x2", which no one understands, and other one with "USB 20Gbps" I think the latter will sell more.

[-] LarsIsCool@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Probably. But then again, if one says "USB 20Gbps", but the one next to it has "80Gbps", it might be better to have had "USB 3.2 Gen 2x2"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Yeah something you don't have to further look up to figure out what it means. Just simpler.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

You mean the 3.0, 3.1 gen 1 and 3.1 gen 2 that all was changed to the same thing?

Even the 3.2 gen 1 is the same as the others IIRC and you need like 3.2 gen2 2x2 to go to even 10gbps.

I'm maybe off a little bit but the gist is there, rant off/

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, this is about the 15th time they've done that.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

But it's the very first time that they are making them actually make sense.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago

Does nothing for existing cables.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

I mean... yeah? They're not gonna break into your house and emboss new symbols on cables you already own.

You may as well be advocating against better food packaging labels because stuff you've bought already won't benefit from it.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Can i not bitch about how shit things have been? Or that these fixes shouldn't even be necessary because they could have just not fucked it up in the first place?

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I don't think you understand what's going on here lol

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 5 points 16 hours ago

Damn that's a lot of bandwidth

this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
243 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

60367 readers
4594 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS