this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
1223 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19676 readers
3563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez urged countering the Trump administration’s policies by resisting at every turn, arguing that its incompetence makes it vulnerable.

Her remarks followed chaos caused by a rescinded executive order that temporarily shut down Medicaid portals nationwide.

She encouraged activists to take offline action, citing ongoing mobilization efforts.

Her strategy focuses on making governance difficult for Trump, calling his administration “dangerous and cruel” but also “shockingly dim.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

"It’s important to know that a lot of productive activity is happening in person and offline, too," she said. "Not all of it can be broadcast online, but we’ve had hundreds of people showing up to our trainings, mobilizations, and more. Keep going. Tyranny is eroded by a sea of small acts. Everything matters."

[–] houstoneulers@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I also think we ought to stop being consumers at a broad level. It's clear the rich don't actually trickle anything down and instead hoard it to invest. So, they won't spend to prop up the economy.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (6 children)

For one, stop using Amazon. Cancel Prime. Use other search engines than Google. Don't use WhatsApp. Cancel and delete your Instagram, Facebook and Twitter if you haven't already. Don't buy Apple products.

For each of those services and products above, there is at least one alternative.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 299 points 4 days ago (63 children)

Any kind of on the ground movement or mobilization needs political support in the halls of power. It's what made the resistance demonstrated against Trump the first term possible, and the dynamic goes both ways. On the ground resistance gives political actors the space to be resilient. Resilient politicians give in the ground movement space to work.

Basically all other Democrats other than Bernie and AOC shrivelling up and hiding in their shells will have a chilling effect on our ability to organize on the ground.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I've been bitching about the lack of leadership from the Democrats for a while now - I'm glad to see that others are seeing it too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 41 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Heinrich from NM has made it clear that he will pushback. Let’s see what that looks like. I suggest folks that can contact your reps, now and frequently.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (61 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 107 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Turns out when all you want are loyalists, all you get are dumb assess.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I thought this was obvious to everyone. Heck, Futurama had this as a joke 20 years ago when Zapp Brannigan stuffed his crew with nothing but loyalists who fall apart immediately.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 139 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (34 children)

It isn't chump and his taintsuckers you gotta worry about.

It's the army of Federalist Society lawyers and policy experts around him. They've spent decades figuring out the removed in the armor of our governmental system. Figuring out how to dismantle it piece by piece.

Edit - wtf is that removed about? Wait....oh. bot thinks I did a racism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ha. Reminds me of an Asian standup comedian who had this routine about how he grew up in the inner city where the basketball nets were made of chains and so the chains didn't go 'swish,' they went 'chіnk.' So when guys wanted to play basketball, they said, "let's go shoot us up some chіnk."

Thank you, Cyrillic letter і, for letting me bypass the bot to tell that joke. Because I've remembered that joke for years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (16 children)

Fucken hell, that's the correct fucking way to define a gap in armor. Bullshit. I really want to try a bunch of slurs out and see what sets it off.

[–] Carl@lemm.ee 42 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I really want to try a bunch of slurs out

This is surely the most rational reaction to being slightly inconvenienced by a word filter.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Anyone else remember Neopets? They had a filter that was extreme and multilingual. I can't count how many times I'd write a friendly message, the filter would block it, and I would end up editing chunks of text trying to avoid whatever word or series of letters the filter thought was inappropriate. Sometimes it'd be a few letters embedded in another word (like "associate" being banned for the letters a s s.) But sometimes, I was truly stumped. The only explanation I can think of is that some letters in English words matched up to swears in other languages.

Anyway, fun fact - I met my first boyfriend through that site. We decided to see how dirty we could talk while still getting messages past the filter. We used innuendos, slang, and other turns of phrase with each other just to see what we could get away with.

In the end, all that filter did was make us more creative at communicating forbidden topics. Whoops ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

SEE WHAT YOU'RE MAKING ME DO? NOW I HAVE TO SAY THE N WORD... I DON'T WANT TO BUT YOU GAVE ME NO CHOICE!

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 57 points 4 days ago

Basically, resist. Do not comply in advance. Make them fire you. Challenge that firing in court.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 137 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (32 children)

"Tyranny is eroded by a sea of small acts. Everything matters."

A lot of Lemmy users really need to understand this. Far too often I see people deride any action that doesn't immediately fix all problems in the world as worthless or meaningless, simply because they lack the imagination needed to see how small actions can add up to big changes.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I used to work for social services in Colorado. There was a Lady there that was fired without cause. She fought it, won in court, got her job back, and I'm pretty sure back pay. Beth, talking bout you, she said always fight, she has and it has always paid off.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'd fight for the back pay, but if someone fired me without cause I wouldn't want to work for them anymore.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In that position you're far more protected from retaliation than a "regular person" -- it's easier to prove with an established history and courts really don't like have their judgments undermined. You've also shown your employer trying to screw with you is expensive.

Go back and do your job to the letter. They're either going to be very wary of pissing you off, or they're going to do something stupid and you'll get another payout.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

I just hope she comes out of this unscathed. It only takes one loon with a shiv... and now there's millions of 'em.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 115 points 4 days ago (7 children)

If all Dems had her tenacity and honest interest in helping the middle class, we wouldn't be where we are.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Look at the "secret service detail" he picked.

He picked loyalty over skill, actually DEI

Just a few inches to the right

Few More Inches

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 35 points 4 days ago

He got rid of DEI to make more room for cronyism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I've said it before, the Democrats need to take pieces out of the Republican playbook and stonewall the GOP at every opportunity. The problem is that they Democratic party is really a coalition, whereas the modern Republicans are a hierarchy, so getting everyone to lock shields and advance is damn near impossible. Especially since establishment "centrist" Dems are just Republicans from the 80s and unfortunately they're the ones calling the shots. None of the progressives are stupid enough to tip the boat over while rocking it, so we've ended up here. Again.

[–] floppy_kitty@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

For a long time, I thought the Democrats were fighting valiantly but just overwhelmed by the oligarchy and the Republicans. Then I saw that the Democrats keep losing fights they should win, and figured they must be weak and ineffectual. Then I kept seeing them backing off without putting up a fight at all, and decided they were gutless cowards. Finally I noticed that enough of them keep voting with Republicans to always make sure the Republicans more of less win almost every fight, and that they keep starting from a center position and bargaining to the right, and eventually it became impossible to ignore the only conclusion that fits the facts: The Democrats are not overmatched, they aren't weak, they aren't cowards... They are complicit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (5 children)

finally, a person with a STRATEGY. so sick of the whining.

she needs volunteers for personal escort and safety. i think she is going to be targeted.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 68 points 4 days ago

She encouraged activists to take offline action

Based

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago

She is possibly our best hope.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Alright, she was eligible to run this time. Can we get her in the white house before she turns 80?

[–] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I would love to start something in my city, and I've already been trying, but it's hard to get people to mobilize. It's disheartening at the very least. Any ideas on how I can be helpful to my country aside from voting?

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 days ago

I'd highly recommend this handy guide on how to find local groups that are building the foundations to fight back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He is definitely confused, weak and incompetent, backed by confused, weak and incompetent Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›