this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1405 points (98.1% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19727 readers
886 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The idea feels like sci-fi because you're so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn't been valid for decades.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 47 points 2 days ago (6 children)

That'd be great, but the "how" is a much harder question. What counts as advertising? Because there's a reason Google, Meta, etc. have their fingers in so many different industries: every single thing that gets attention could be leveraged for advertising, even the act of suppressing mentions of competitors.

Should I be able to say "X product has been great, I recommend it!" Only if I'm not being paid, you say? How could you possibly know?

As discussed in the article, "propaganda" is illegal. So any discussion about how terrible trump is would also be illegal. Propaganda doesn't mean false, it just means it's trying to convince you of something. An advertisement. Heck, the article itself could be considered a form of advertising for legislation.

It's just so trivial of a concept to say, but the moment you spend any amount of time thinking about it, it falls apart. It's like trying to ban the Ship of Theseus from a club.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago

I'm just going to take this opportunity to remind everyone that you can and should donate to your Mastodon and Lemmy instances, even if it's just $5 a month. That's how we band together to keep these platforms ad-free, and I don't know about you all, but I love that my mind isn't being manipulated here.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 148 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (29 children)

It's also a form free market distortion that actual economic conservatives should hate.

Rather than having firms compete for who can make the best product or service, advertising instead lets them compete based on who can best psychologically manipulate the population en masse.

It's a "rich get richer" mechanic that any halfway competent dev would've patched out for balance reasons a long time ago.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

It's also such a funny contradiction: a big part of the free market model rests on the idea that well informed consumers can vote with their wallet, which should reward good businesses and punish bad ones. Yet it is very difficult to argue consumers have ever been informed enough to make this work, which is in large part due to advertising flooding communication channels with noise, and also because it is unreasonable to expect a consumer to be fully informed for the hundreds of purchases they make on a daily basis.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

I would like meaningful regulation on advertising. Something to the effect of "STOP BLASTING MY FACE WITH ADS EVERY CHANCE YOU GET YOU SCUMFUCKERS"

There is a gas station nearby who runs non-stop unmutable (there is no mute button) ads. I don't go to that gas station anymore.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I HATE when I am forced to watch commercials, in front of my face on the gas pump, while I am pumping gas into my vehicle. I should really get a discount on my gas for that.

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Somebody went around my town and busted over 200 of those over a weekend.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago

Personally I've been of the opinion that advertising, at least in its current form, should be illegal since I was about 15. I'm not 100% sure if it should be completely illegal, or just very heavily regulated. Even after all those years, I'm still baffled nearly every day that people around me seem okay with current advertising.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Oh please yes

Put a 100% stop to advertising but also marketing altogether.

load more comments (22 replies)

I concur.

Some places limit advertising more than others. Banned on footpaths and dangerous spots. What about sales persons? How do you brand a product? I think it would have to be well defined.

I am ok with technical information being provided by a staff member. So much shit is peddled through marketing. As the scientist designing the product, I want to tell them the truth, customers love the truth, in this regard. I think banning deception and conning further would be a good way. And fuck this debt model of economics. And how about universities turn back into noble education organisations, not cocksucking psuedo-businesses.

I think govts/politicians like keeping the vague open because they use it, too. Their propaganda departments are cucked with good fact checking teams.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

what if we made capitalism illegal? because all of the bullshit like advertising is symptomatic. the root cause is capitalism. western civilization has to be reset entirely. and it will never get done through protesting.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah with advances in software and AI you could also manage the economy much more efficient and in real time than the old "planned economy". Shortages and problems could be handled quickly. With crowd funding you could also have banks providing funds for new enterprises (collectives / coops) by people voting democratically on what to approve.

The issue is that I haven't seen any serious work on improving socialism, which most socialists seem to think is a heretical concept. So there is a lack of valid alternatives to capitalism that people can imagine. And the power balance and technology for propaganda to control the population and weaponry and tactics the stage manage protests has advanced too.

And then there is the issue that no matter what ideology and system, those who desire power or wealth above anything else are more likely to attain it, and we haven't yet found good antibodies to this fundamental problem of managing power. Or even know about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty dumb article if you spend more than a second thinking about this issue.

The entire historical premise that we "didn't have ads" is so fucking incorrect and reeks of appeal to nature. Yeah we didn't have tv ads but we had monarchs and elite that played the same role. How is paying of some sleezy high up salesman is different from a Google search ad? If anything the latter is more ethically apt.

I'd take democracy with ads over whatever the fuck that alternative timeline that polices "unpaid word of mouth"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh what a world. But it would NEVER happen. Might as well wish for super powers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Believe it or not, advertising on the Internet was originally highly frowned upon. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurence_Canter_and_Martha_Siegel

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still is, but it used to be, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Should we allow the best of science to be used to manipulate people's base desires? Or should we protect the average person from being taken advantage of?

Unless you are a sociopath the answer is clear. Advertising in its current form should be completely banned. Perhaps some form of non-comparative advertising could be allowed if it just stated simple facts without creating a psychological hook to subconsciously fuck with the consumer.

Who am I kidding though, give these fuckers even an inch and they will circumnavigate the globe. Ban all advertising.

[–] mrmule@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Took a trip to Cuba, one of the first things I noticed was lack of billboards and advertising in general. It was quite refreshing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 68 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think life would feel more calm, spacious and peaceful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago

Advertising is one of the three major incoherent industries along with Insurance and Real Estate.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I was on a car from ride sharing app recently, and there was a tablet in front of me playing ads continuously for the whole ride. Asked the driver to turn it off and he said, "I have to keep it on". I know it's not the requirement from the app, so honestly how dystopian is it?

The way things are going people can't afford anything and will have ads blasting in front of them for discounts.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

this happened to me once and I gave them 1 star for forcing me to watch ads

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I don't like to buy anything I've seen advertised. I just don't trust it

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think regulation is better than abolishing it.

With most initiatives that have been made in good faith to avoid bad actors, it will usually hit the little guy the hardest.

In my country, for example, you can apply for grants for your business for developing your business. Great right? Wrong. The bureaucracy is so crazy that small businesses, whom this grant was aimed towards, cannot feasibly take the grant. It is too expensive for them to go through all the steps to get the money for the developmental aspect of the business that they would lose money as a business and not be able to recoup their losses. The grant money are so small and aren't allowed to be used to run the business at all that it simply isn't worth it to even try. You would essentially have to work for free for days or weeks in some cases to get this tiny portion that will now sink your company instead of developing it.

However, a big business with many employees and time and money to spare, could easily apply for the grant and get it without a sweat, despite them not needing it at all.

That is how I'd see a potential ban of ads affect the market. The big businesses who got to benefit from ads and marketing in the past will continue to do well because people know them while any and all new start ups and smaller businesses would drown and go bankrupt due to them not being allowed to make people aware of their business.

It is a bit too utopic for my taste to suggest a ban. But regulation would be a good thing in my opinion.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›