this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
513 points (96.7% liked)

Greentext

5985 readers
2229 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] towelie@lemm.ee 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Bro watched South Park at 14 and said mmm yes that will be my personality

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

The whole "liberal tears" stuff came from the gingers episode.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 26 points 8 hours ago

All well and good until mom's retirement accounts tank and you can no longer live in her basement.

[–] msage@programming.dev 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of different comments, and I know this is a greentext, but I wonder what people here think about americans who have 3 jobs and can only barely pull through?

Such people have nothing more to lose, everybody constantly keeps forgetting about them, the homeless, sick people... the list goes on.

And I'm not saying acceleration is good, but for the lost people, nothing good is coming from any side. And the pressure keeps getting worse. Even from the democrats.

So what is the solution, achievable as the world is now?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Such people have nothing more to lose,

This is a very big flaw in that kind of argument. It might look like that but there are plenty of worse situations human beings have been in historically. There is no war going on, food and clean water and shelter (even with heating and lighting) are actually available,...

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago

Absolutely! That kind of thinking of "I have nothing to lose" is pretty dangerous on politics. You still have a truckload more to lose. Mostly in matter of rights mostly but imagine being in worse dystopias the oligarchy would love to put you on just to squeeze an extra penny from you or better yet read about it in history books.
The worst part is that it takes decades to fix the damage done, soon you realize there is no bottom to touch to think "you can only go up" there is only the moment you guys realize "enough is enough".

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 9 hours ago

The best thing to come of all of this would be bookers suffer too.

Fuck you and your house and car and planed retirment

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The opposite of pro life is mandatory abortion for all.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't it require going to full term, and then aborting post delivery?

Or maybe it's forced sterilization for all?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

aborting post delivery?

Up to 120 years post delivery?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 2 hours ago

my child my choice

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 30 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"The changes haven't affected me (yet) so I have no problem with it"

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"wait, they're cancelling pre orders for the switch 2? REEEEE"

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

That's a "soy console", OP will wake up once his PC will cost 2-3 times as much thanks to tariffs.

[–] softcat@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Anon before being sent to pick tendies in the fields at the debtor detention facility

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 25 points 22 hours ago

Anon is an enlightened accelerationist

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 165 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem with NEET-ism is you eventually run out of your parent's money.

[–] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's where the goverment suppoorted neet's come into the picture.

I know some neet's who get more money from goverment than some people working 60 hour jobs.

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't feel like someone relying on government helps would think some corporate fascist who generally wants to reduce government spendings represents their interest, but then again I don't think there is a logical framework in which we won't conclude that OP is at least a little bit dumb. But what makes me favour the parents supported hypothesis is the "never paid for anything " part.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I am from a very poor place in WV where most people are on assistance because there are no jobs.

Trump flags everywhere. Cars driving down the road with no tags or insurance, but Trump stickers all over.

I don’t get it. Well, actually I do.

Religion. The preacher says the gay is bad. Preacher says the trans is bad. Democrats want to extend basic rights to those people and preacher says god don’t like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 184 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Fuck you, I never had mine" is definitely one of the positions one could take.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago

Except we still live in ‘free’ market vibes based capitalism - where the profits are privatized, and the losses get socialized. If this tariff stupidity goes on, there will be some kind of bailout/grift like there always is. From PPP loans, sweetheart tax breaks, to liquidity bailouts for banks, the Fed will step in and Congress will have to do something to restore market and consumer confidence. Or else we all facetank turbo inflation, job losses, and stagnant wages in a new economic depression.

If these NEETs were old enough to have been alive during the 2008 crash, they spent it playing Modern Warfare 2 and wondering why everyone else had big sad - after all, they still had vidya, porn, and tendies living at home.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah.. It's fair? If wealth isn't distributed well, blaming radical ideas will only fuel the fire. Solution is a much deeper one no one wants to invest into.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I can call it a really stupid take while also acknowledging we need deep systemic change.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How did they never pay for anything? Shoplifting? Are they literally a statue of a Confederate general?

The secret ingredient... is crime

[–] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Loans

Anon has never had a job, and banks need income to give you a loan.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Welfare hardly finances existance, let alone life. The three I named are more like it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Good boy points are not subject to tarrifs

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They seem oddly confident in the police state and cultural sharia they voted for will never come for them.

[–] kaaskop@feddit.nl 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or they don't care. Don't underestimate how self destructive depression can be.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't blame this on depression. Most depressed people doesn't become fascists. If anything this is their narcissism showing itself.

[–] kaaskop@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

I dont think al of the people that voted for the annoying orange agree with the fascistic tendencies. It's probably an unhealthy mix of suicidals and depressed people, angry people, fascists, idiots and morons. Neither of these are mutually exclusive of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some men want to see the world burn.

[–] Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)

There really are an unfortunate number of people who want to see the world burn in some fashion. Entertainment, because they can’t stand not poking a bear with a stick, or maybe because they’re a crab in a bucket and are willing to destroy others’ success because they have none of their own.

[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago

The prices remain the same when you steal everything

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The most dangerous people are those with nothing to lose.

The least dangerous people are those with nothing to gain.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

I kinda understand their point of view here actually. Wanting to drag everyone down to their level. Burn it all down.

load more comments
view more: next ›