this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
314 points (97.9% liked)

movies

3477 readers
283 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No CGI Jabba the Hutt.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Only in one city in the world?

Please don't let it be in the US, please don't let it be the US...

London?! Hot pukka pies, that's totally hench!

Edit: Also looks like an amazing line up for the Film on Film festival. Peak celebration of films, in the medium of film.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I've always loved the pose the dude on the back does

[–] ech@lemm.ee 68 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Once had a discussion with some coworkers that legit didn't know the original cut had no Jabba. They were so certain that they actually almost had me convinced for a moment.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

George Lucas is one of a handful of people on the planet where you can accurately say "They ruined my childhood."

Like, if you're a massive fan of the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles but hate the most recent incarnation, you can still go back and watch the original. Lucas has gone out of his way to make that more difficult for Star Wars fans. It's an impressive level of aggression and back-stabbery for the people who made him wealthy to begin with.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Original cut of Ep4 only, right? Because some of the others did have Jabba.

E: oh, I see. Yes. 'Star Wars', as in Ep4. Cool. Yes. No Jabba.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

There’s only one StarWars ma’am and I’m pretty sure he doesn’t have a CG Dinosaur.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What kind of Mandela effect shit is this?

I’ve spent more time than I would like to admit trying to fact check this. I swear when the special editions came out one of the behind the scenes was about restoring the scene with the fur coat Jabba that had appeared in the first pre-title-crawl version. Now all I can find are references to it being rereleased at least 4 times before the special edition but nothing about scene edits.

[–] Mandrilleren@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

As I understand it the original jabba scene where never in any release. It was recorded but scraped during editing.

[–] variants_of_concern@lemmy.one 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I remember they had to edit solo going up as he walked around to simulate him going over his snail tail

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Which was a pretty dumb edit because Jabba didn't seem like the kind of guy that would let Solo get away with stepping on him. And Solo would have also known that and not casually stepped on his tail.

Not to mention Jabba also didn't seem like the kind of guy to meet with a smuggler he had a bounty on alone in a random ship bay. Even if Solo wouldn't have been willing to just shoot his debt and bounty away, Jabba couldn't have been sure about it and Solo already wasted a bounty hunter that caught up to him.

Would have been better to just edit the audio to make the other guy a representative of Jabba instead of sticking to the "this is Jabba but filmed before we decided to make him an alien slug so now we need to make it look like Jabba". Even without the tail step, he looks ridiculous walking around like that compared to the massive thing he was just a year or so later, like he's Jabba's younger brother or nephew.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

No-one out-pizza’s the hut!

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] moody@lemmings.world 21 points 2 days ago

We don't see him until Return of the Jedi.

The remaster shoved in a stupid CGI scene of him in A New Hope.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

None at all. They originally filmed the scene with an actor in a big fur coat, but they cut it out because it's kind of redundant - we don't learn anything about Han that the earlier scene with Greedo doesn't teach us in a more interesting way. Then they decided that Jabba would be a giant slug man some time in between 1977 and 1983.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no original version of Star Wars. G Lucas started changing theatre's. movie while it was still in theatres. He sent an updated sound cut in theatres 90 days after it released.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So...the one that ran for those 90 days is the original?

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

You would think, but no. Two versions of that movie shipped to theatres. Some already had a new soundtrack.

Also, if the Star Wars movie you saw had Episode IV A New Hope ... you have not actually seen the original as that movie was just "Star Wars".

[–] Gobo@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Han shot first.

Edit: actually read the article

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

β€œI’m sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be.”

And we want it to be the way we want it to be, and we are the ones who put money in your pocket.

He should be allowed to fulfill his vision. But he shouldn't take away the one that people like.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Is this showing 4k77?

Edit: no, looks like they're showing the technicolor film directly from the BFI National Archive. Similar to the one 4k77 was scanned from.

Reading the article it seems like they're just using a mint condition film reel they've been waiting to arrive for awhile

[–] BenThereDoneThat@lemm.ee 23 points 2 days ago

Oh hell yeah. The new versions with cgi additions are when I started to drift from star wars

[–] doug@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago

Only in London πŸ˜”

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want to dig out old forum posts where Lucas fans told everyone that Lucas wasn't lying that there would never be an original release because the original prints were destroyed in the process of making his special editions.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I knew he was a lying fuck, no way in hell the process would destroy the originals unless he was a complete idiot or purposefully did so with the intent to hide history.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 11 points 2 days ago

As the article says, there are still original distribution prints from 1977 out there, squirreled away in private print collections.

So they might be dragging one of those out for this showing.

As for the original negatives... only Lucas knows.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

George Lucas in shambles rn

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The true original, without the text crawl?

[–] pelley@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

The original had the crawl, just not the Episode IV - A New Hope part. Source: I saw it in May 1977.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But who's going to believe that this will be the original original?

London only. Fuck.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

London only. Fuck.

Fucking fuck fuck fuck. Damn it.

I'm noticing that, at least in AMC through Fathom Events, they've been showing one Star Wars movie per year. Tickets for Star Wars Episode III are on sale now, so I wonder if next year this will hit the States.

I also wonder how this will compare to existing fan restorations that are available online, and if they'll release some sort of special edition 4K Blu-Ray or something with this on it.

When Han shoots first some dweebs are gonna clap and cheer.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

one time, my sister told me we should watch the unaltered star wars trilogy. through the magic of two hungarians who speak very good english, i managed to hear that "unaltered" as "anal turd"

i was somewhat puzzled for a bit there, i gotta admit