My friends and I can always find 50 other apps for voice chatting, texting and screen sharing. What pisses me off royally is the thousands of companies/groups that decided instead of making forums or websites or GitHub pages, they would just host EVERYTHING from within Discord's walled garden.
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
261 points (100.0% liked)
Gaming
31261 readers
125 users here now
From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!
Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.
See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
While it sucks for us users, I do hope discord will continue to get more and more shit and force these losers who chose to host documentation on Discord to rethink their choices.
load more comments
(3 replies)
im on a year paid sub but ill be cancelling that shit
And so the hell-loop continues. Matrix seems like the closest successor, but having used it for awhile I would describe the experience as janky-but-workable. Signal's good, but requires a phone number. I hear that Mumble's good, but it's overly focused on VoIP. Hopefully the alternatives polish themselves up before the enshittification gets too bad.
I use Matrix, but like a lot of the Fediverse (I know it's technically a different protocol, but still), it's not normie friendly. If it were more plug n play it might take off. I just don't look forward to when they'll have ads or start making us pay. It's so tiring shuffling from platform to platform because of some greedy CEO.
load more comments
(5 replies)
I can't tell for sure, but it doesn't look like Revolt has voice chat yet? Which was what attracted my friend group to Discord initially.
Yeah, sadly most open source alternatives to discord either cannot do voice/video chat or cannot do it as well or seamlessly as discord did, partially because federated voice/video chat is not really a solved issue and partially because of money. Though even most of the centralised ones don't really have voice/video chat that works well except for a few like Signal because they have the resources.
Another problem is it's based on p2p a lot of the time, whereas I think things like discord partially use their servers to facilitate it, I'll check on this though.
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
This whole “spend a ton of money to get your foothold, take over a market, then enshittify to bilk the users” shtik is getting very very old.
That's tech companies for you.
Why else would they make all this for free?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Everyone loves Activision and what they've done for gaming. There no way this could go wrong.
Great time to plug that https://revolt.chat/ is coming along nicely! The Android app is being reworked and is in rough shape at the moment, but the biggest feature missing from the desktop app (where I figure it matters most) is screen sharing. Otherwise it's an entirely serviceable Discord clone that is FOSS and would benefit greatly from additional support. I, for one, will be taking the money that was paying for my Nitro and donating it to Revolt instead.
Does it have e2ee messages (even in group chats) and calling? One reason we never used discord is because it lacked that (except in calling towards the end).
Edit: Seems they are "working on it", which makes us a bit nervous but hopefully it'll be implemented everywhere: https://github.com/orgs/revoltchat/discussions/597
No, it should be treated as what it is: a public forum. The only app I would trust to keep my messages truly private is Signal.
They are working on it: https://github.com/orgs/revoltchat/discussions/597
Also we disagree as not all groups on even discord are public since many require invites or accepting requests to join.
Edit: Also, even if they are public I'd rather the server not be able to see my messages even if the users in any given group can. Yes, I know it's a minor difference but I can probably trust the other users, I cannot necessarily trust the server.
I certainly won't say no to additional privacy! But until I see cryptography experts call it secure, I'm going to continue to treat it as a public forum.
Fair enough.
Did they fix the self-hosted option? If it works well, I would immediately jump to it.
I don't believe so, and honestly I don't think it needs to be. It's already FOSS. And honestly self-hosting would just complicate the process more for normies who apparently can't figure out Mastodon as it is. Maybe if we have at lest one thing that's dummy simple and familiar that's FOSS, maybe it'll be the foot in the door to getting them more comfortable with the FOSS world and out of the corporate sphere.
And honestly I just really want my friends off of fucking Discord, and the more Revolt continues to literally, in every way be "Discord but open source," the better the odds of that happening is.
Whenever there is a single party controlling critical infrastructure, there is a potential for enshittification - even if it starts as a FOSS endeavor.
Ability to self-host a full copy of the service is the best protection we have so far.
While that's true, the nature of it being FOSS also ensures the potential for forking and going our own way. So for right now, maybe it's better that it's not self-hosted, long enough to get a large number of Discord users on-board, then fork it if it does enshittify and make the fork self-hosted. At the very least, again, this is an opportunity to get a large number of normies to see the value of FOSS projects and enter the FOSS world. And that has immense value not just for Revolt, but for the FOSS world as a whole.
I see your point!
And I do see yours as well! I agree self-hosting gas greater resistance to devs going rogue when all the hosts can just stop participating. But the beauty of Open Source is that if it's ever truly so bad, the project can always just fork.
How is this app supposed to ensure its continued existence? I see no mention of donations, federation, or advertisement
The desktop app has a donation button in the settings. There's also links to their donation pages on their github, but I do think in both instances they should have their donation link more front and center; it's proven to work out well for multiple other FOSS projects.
Ah, I see. I was only looking at their website
load more comments
(2 replies)
A former Activision CEO. Can you announce "hostility to our users" any louder, Discord?
How the fuck are blizzard execs still getting fucking jobs?!?!! Jesus Christ people, could you find a worse person to run the company?
Because he “has experience managing a public company” and in his portfolio only focuses on cherry-picked KPIs and no mention of any negatives at all.
I hate that our society encourages failing up and instead of punishment because of poor management skills and decisions, they do mass layoffs and give themselves fat bonuses because of “cost savings”.
Frankly, if a company fails, they will ruin other companies; it’s never their fault because of “complicated reasons”.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well, that's that ruined then.
So glad I never got into that thing.
Just doesn't understand why so many people prefer Discord over forums. In terms of information preservation Discord sucks!
It's even become mandatory by communities in some games, which is something I hate with passion. For instance, many MMORPG communities are on Discord these days (e.g. Guild Wars 2, more specifically the raiding scene).
So I subscribed to these communities and started using Discord. I still don't get the appeal, it's a cluttered mess all over the place and it doesn't feel intuitive to use. Maybe I'm getting old...
I think the main thing is that it's the lowest friction for just sending a message, making a "post" gives people pause, but sending a message people will do no problem, so small communities get more activity in Discord than anywhere else
load more comments
(3 replies)
It's joever fellas 😔
[sarcasm] Who could have ever seen it coming? [/sarcasm]
Honestly, the writing was on the wall for a long time, it had no clear business model and was a mess. It was always going to go this way and I tried pointing out that it was a bad platform but nobody either cared or believed me. Whelp, looks like I was a Cassandra yet again.
Hope Open Source people can make something to fill the gap, there really is nothing else (yet). Matrix really doesn't have the features and that which it does have is often bad UX and doesn't work everywhere. Not seen anything else which will fill the gap and I've been looking but I guess nobody thought discord would go down, go this way, or just don't really know how to make something that would fill the gap, or didn't want to.
Moving towards becoming a shit company, you mean.
view more: next ›