this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
252 points (98.5% liked)

politics

23339 readers
2758 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This sounds like a positive development, the incompetence will slow him down. The fuckwits will be stumbling over one another. Short of mass suicide, I’m not sure what better a result we could hope for.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right-wingers with better aim?

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Jack Black would be very cross with you if he was here!

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We aren’t lifelong friends, so no need for him to throw me under the bus to protect his Minecraft Movie payday.

Y'know, when you put it like that, it kinda makes Jack look just a little bad. A small smidge of oops, there.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It will also remove any worries about accidentally harming innocents when a mob storms the white house and rips them all apart

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if anyone has ever realistically gamed out how just how big a mob it would take to get into someplace that well protected.

Not like when the 3 y/o ran through the fence or anything, like to brute force inside the actual important side of the Whitehouse.

It’s nothing like the Capital building, that’s for sure.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

My guess is that it's much smaller than most people would think. If you could get 1000 protestors to split up and block key access routes, you could probably take care of things with 100 well trained soldiers, maybe even less. The key is to distract with the protestors, get police busy on the other side of town, then when everyone is looking at that, smoke out and rush, breach with TATP, and storm. Those floor plans of the WH that just got leaked will probably be helpful.

Really the best time would be during the first big snow storm in DC where the traitor is in house. Visibility on cctv and other surveillance will be unreliable at best, road conditions will slow any response. Tracks will most likely all be covered by the morning. You can cover your face and wear multiple layers without raising suspicion.In that case just breach and storm with 100-200 men from all angles, rig any helicopter pads and roofs to blow, although weather will make it difficult for a helo as well. Try and post 5-10 man teams on any of the evac tunnel exits that you know of from the WH. Once the mission is done disperse out into the storm and disappear. Oh yeah, no fucking cell phones, as if that needs to be said.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It is not a positive development. Thoughts & prayers aren’t going to save a thing.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

kakistocracy

Noun

kakistocracy (plural kakistocracies)

  1. (political scienceGovernment under the control of a nation's worst or least-qualified citizens. [from 1829.]
[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Great word. FWIW “kakken” is a Dutch word for defecating. It’s not as crude as “schijten”, maybe more like “to (take a) crap”.

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

In German it's "Kacken"....

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Four Seasons Total Landscaping.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 44 minutes ago

I love that the FSTL are owning their fame.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Lol what an awkward cringey evil person.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Before you go, mix a laxative into the sugar for the coffee.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I mean, would he even notice? I'm not so sure that he has reliable bowel control on a good day...

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago

I hope whoever holds the nuclear briefcase goes to grounds in California or the EU.

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Shock and horror" is more like it. I'm assuming he will replace people that don't fall in line with more white supremacy, boot licking, pig fuckers.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

shock and awful

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That would be in line with both the headline and his role model from the 1940s with the moustache.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

This would actually be the best way for the MAGA movement to end I think, but I doubt they’d believe he really killed himself.

(Also Trump thinks he’s a fucking god-perfect human, and he’s a pussy. There’s no way he’d off himself.)

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I think he does a few times a day in his diaper.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

He does that regularly, just too bad he doesn’t change his diaper just as often.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At this point I'm surprised someone hasn't made a website with a checklist comparing his actions to a different dicators throughout history and how many have done the same things.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just go to the project 2025 progress website. All of this was preplanned.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's a pretty nice website. Although I was more thinking of a very simple one that is literally just a table. With his actions in the first column, and a second column listing which dictators have done a very similar thing and when.

Having it directly show which dictators have done the same things and how many of his statements and orders match their rise to power, is a simple graphic to let people relate to the dangers directly from what they know.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can make that if someone wants to collect data and sources

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's why it hasn't been made yet, actually collecting the data is the time consuming part.

You could literally make it as a static page with an HTML table using old-school borders and zero CSS. Hell, that might actually help convince the older republicans even more.

Although to be fair, you could probably use "ai" to collect a lot of the basics about who has done similiar things. That way you just have to check if it's true and get the link, instead of trying to research each thing.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Why, it's a 1 for 1.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

A year ahead of schedule 😮‍💨

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Get rid of people who actually know how to do things and replace them with his own tools.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

To be honest I assumed most Whitehouse staff are political appointees. If that's the case he's looking to fire all the incompetent people he brought on himself. But some may be apolitical.

The article says “starting with mid-level staff” and they clearly don’t know how to do things. If they mean White House literally, low-level staff are probably the only people who do know how to do things right now. I doubt the kitchen workers, cleaning staff, tour guides, etc. are even people to Trump. Even the chef/kitchen staff just probably has to handle state dinners and other events but most days, just make a McDonald’s run or burn a steak.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] msprout@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

God, what the fuck else is new? That has been every day since January, man.

[–] qbus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Which January? I remember he tried to get someone murdered on a January 6th not too many years ago

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article leads with that headline, but quickly piviots to talking about Mike Waltz being tossed in a place Trump doesn't care about.

That said, if it happens, I'll laugh my ass off as they fire everyone who knows how to do the real work.

[–] mdd@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Didn't this happen yesterday?

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

The only ones left will be Russian and Chinese moles.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How many times does this guy have to fill a swamp before his followers realizing there wasn't anything to drain until he showed up?

[–] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

I mean… there was and is plenty of swamp to drain, it’s just that Trump was never actually gonna do it. Legalized corruption is part of why we’re in this mess.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rinse and repeat every 100 days.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Or approximately 10 scarramuchis

[–] Astrophage@lemy.lol 3 points 3 days ago

Just remember, it's not for Project 2025, whatever that is, even though the authors are great buddies of his. /s

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

What's funny is everyone in b that phone also has the same apps. Including the vice fucking president.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The plan reportedly involves firing staff in a massive wave rather than doing it piecemeal, starting with mid-level White House staffers.

Pfft...

Sounds like just purging "staff" same as getting rid of "staff" across government entities like they've been doing.

Just getting more "roadblocks" out of their way.

No reference to cabinet personnel... (other that the mention of Walz' "re-assignment".) 🤷‍♂️ 🤡

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Purges! The cornestone of every ludicrous dictator! (A nod here to the classic Pulp Fiction line)