this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
940 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

16157 readers
1502 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Texas bill, known as the FURRIES Act, would ban non-human behaviors in public schools, including the use of litter boxes and wearing animal accessories.

Rep. Stan Gerdes, the bill's author, claimed schools were providing litter boxes for students acting as "furries."

When pressed, Gerdes could not find an example. The bill was left pending in committee.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nothing is more pathetic than a politician who believes their own propaganda.

[–] projectsquared@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Do they really believe it or do they know how fucking gullible a large swath of their electorate is?

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago

The Conservative Propaganda Machine has been recruiting and indoctrinating consrvatives since Rush Lbaugh hit the airwaves in the mid-80s. We are now 2-3 generations removed from that, and people who were raised on hearing conservative propganda at the dinner table, and conservative "values," have grown up and run for office.

Some of them recognize that its all a long con, but quite a few of them believe the propaganda as well. Then there are those who believe the propaganda, and and also see conservatism as a life hack to get what you want by immoral, unethical, and illegal behavior.

[–] KiwiFlavor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Beyond the blatant stupidity of the bill, the most concerning part is the definition of "non-human behavior." I would not be surprised if some schools interpreted queer people, those with disabilites, and those from minority ethnic, religious, or racial groups to be exhibitong "non-human behaviors." These groups have already been dehumanized historically.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Absolutely. Any vague language has a way of being misinterpreted by the most fanatical and used for evil.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 13 points 6 days ago

That child is dressed like a plant! Arrest him!

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 61 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] Eddy@lemm.ee 22 points 6 days ago

You can't even meow, so no learning about the noises animals make

[–] spizzat2@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The bill makes exceptions for mascots, school plays and Halloween.

Source

Or starting on page 4 of the bill

Edit: Don't get me wrong, the bill is still a terrible idea, but it appears that a miniscule amount of thought went into it.

[–] sowitzer@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

Almost every school mascot today is some sort of non offensive animal. Puma, panther, golden eagles, a few others. Probably setting up the magas who want to go back to some real non woke “American hero” names. Gen Lee Slavemasters, red injun killers, white supremists, things like that. lol.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unless animal control can run up to 60mph, that cheetah kid is getting away.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

Cheetah kids can only maintain 60mph over a short distance. If animal control can follow at a steady pace, they'll catch up eventually.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 58 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The litter box in schools thing happened in all of my dad's WhatsApp friends schools, but there's no pictures of it 🤔

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

It started because of school shootings, ironically enough. If you’re in a lockdown for hours while the cops take their sweet time, (coughUvaldecough), there’s a near 100% chance that at least one of the children in your class is going to need to use the restroom during that time.

Luckily, camp toilets are a thing:

They’re basically a 5 gallon bucket with a snap-on toilet seat lid. You use a trash bag to line it, then sprinkle an alginate powder in, (the same powder used in diapers) and it turns into a gel when it gets wet. This helps avoid the smell and splashing, and a single small sachet of alginate powder is enough for the entire bucket.

As an added bonus, you can use the bucket to store other things that might be needed in a shooting or extended lockdown. Tourniquets, gauze, protein bars, etc… It’s all there in a single grab-and-go location. Lockdown starts, you pull the bucket out of the closet, dump all the supplies out, and set it in the corner for kids to use if they need to pee.

But this very quickly got flipped around, because conservatives didn’t want the left to start using “schools need toilets in the classrooms because school shootings are so frequent” campaigns. So they flipped it around, and said schools were providing litter boxes to furries. There’s also a heavy anti-trans lean on the litter boxes messaging, which just plays into the conservative fear mongering even more.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (24 children)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Best we can do is take away hypothetical litter boxes in school.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I had an idiot teenager working for me who insisted it was happening at his school, but couldn't tell me which classroom or teacher was allowing it.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We truly live in the dumbest timeline. Seems like ~50% of the population has no "bullshit filter".

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

They have an “actively seek out bullshit that props up my radical beliefs and hatreds” filter.

[–] Juliee@lemm.ee 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

He is probably a furry in secret, very effective way to make these things happen.

It takes real dedication to make a career in politics as republican with a single plan to turn kids into furries by goading them into protesting anti furry bill

[–] helloyanis@jlai.lu 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If anyone wants the wikipedia article about this litter box in schools thing, here you go+

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's wiki entries like this that clearly label it as a hoax which is why Republicans think Wikipedia is woke.

[–] helloyanis@jlai.lu 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh no, look! A website gathering from various quotes and sources and citing them to build a complete and comprehensive page of information about something!

Even if anyone doesn't "trust" wikipedia, you can look at the sources or do your own ressearch.

But for any subject keep in mind to cross-check the info of your sources with multiple other sources and see if they tell you the same thing!

I understand that most people won't do it for news feeds they see online but if someone passes a law about this, it's the absolute least you can do!

Sometimes (most of the time lately) I'm happy to not be a resident of the US to avoid stupid stuff like that

Edit : Just added the link to the furries act article in the see also section!

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

One thing I'd like to see under Reactions would be one from furries, because we don't want litter boxes. That's not a thing. The whole premise is broken.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Of course not. Like most of their "anti-woke" ideas, they are based on lofty ideas.

They do this to misdirect you from the real problems, those that they usually caused all by themselves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At no point I do I think bullying should be allowed in schools but the reality is that if a kid was demanding a litter box in which to relieve themselves, they would get ostracized, bullied into oblivion, and that behavior would stop right away. No legislation required. Humans have a way of self correcting themselves in group environments. It's an evolutionary trait from our days as tribes.

Again, bullying is a huge problem that needs to be taken far more seriously in our school systems... Buuuut, humans will act like humans, especially human children, when it comes down to things way outside the norm. Its just the way we are at this stage in evolution.

bullying is a huge problem that needs to be taken far more seriously in our school systems

I fear the reason bullying isn't taken seriously in schools is because those in positions of power frequently use bully tactics to get there. Fascists and bullies are one and the same, and on some level, corrupt school administrators know that. School bullies provide useful extensions of fascist behavior, applied by peers to encourage conformity in environments where adults are absent. Why would fascists in charge ever want to stop that?

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

I wonder if this topic needs to be x-posted to !furry@lemmy.world

[–] Elkot@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

Furries are notoriously stealthy, it's not like they walk around in bright furry colours or anything

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 6 days ago

what, have they have been finding examples of trans kids in school sports?

load more comments
view more: next ›