this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1148 points (99.1% liked)

Uplifting News

15417 readers
671 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't get why a such law took so long, but late is better than never.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 91 points 1 month ago (5 children)

And if it fails, you know whoever voted for it to not pass is a child predator. Hopefully there's a list of people who voted "no" on it that gets leaked so people, especially parents, know who to cut contact with.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 64 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, basically every Republican legislature or executive is a child predator. It's like a prerequisite to join the party. Their ratings don't drop when they're exposed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Hopefully there's a list of people who voted "no" on it that gets leaked

There is no need for leaks, it's right in the article:

The final version of the bill passed the House by a vote of 129-14, with one member voting present. In the Senate, it passed by a vote of 32-1. Sen. Mike Moon, R-Ash Grove, was the only vote against.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gaja@lemm.ee 88 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Rep. Hardy Billington, R-Poplar Bluff, was among the few who spoke against the bill, arguing that barring pregnant teenagers from getting married would increase abortion rates.

“We all claim to be pro-life here in the body,” Billington said. “Now we’re going to vote on this bill where babies are going to die.”

Disgusting. What a pitiful excuse to enable the trafficking of children. I'm ashamed to live here. There's no fucking guarantee that it would even increase abortion rate, this guy is a closeted pedophile looking out for his ilk.

Apparently he's been spouting this bullshit for at least the past year. Not to mention he's also a homophobe.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Sounds like an old guy from the 50s, who still clings to 50s social mores and stigmas, unaware that being a single mother isn't the massive taboo he remembers it being.

Checks Hardy Billington's Wikipedia page

Born 1952 or 1953 (age 71–72)

Aaaaaand there we have it. Not sure why his exact birthdate isn't known. In fact the only notable thing on that page is about him expressing opposition to another child marriage bill that was proposed last year. Imagine having "strongly endorses child marriage" as the one and only legacy from your 70+ years of life. Gross.

[–] gaja@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

It's okay because there's an R next to his name. It wouldn't shock me if people were fully aware of his views. The abortion argument works for women here and the men here were sold at "child marriage."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"in a move that infuriates conservatives..."

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The final version of the bill passed the House by a vote of 129-14, with one member voting present. In the Senate, it passed by a vote of 32-1. Sen. Mike Moon, R-Ash Grove, was the only vote against.

What sort of garbage person do you have to be to vote against something like this?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 month ago

A Republican

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

Check the hard drives of those 14

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The next time someone makes fun of shithole countries remind them that hundreds of 12yo are married in the US every year. And I guess their little bodies are ready for motherhood because many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago

many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding

Wow, they are just precocious in every way, aren’t they?

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The usual shit that islamophobes would say is that 'at least they aren't 9' even if many Islamic countries ban that shit and large age gaps in marriage (Egypt is one example) and many children marriages that do happen are between children. As in, an 11 year old girl is betrothed to a 14 year old boy (still not cool though). They also ignore that in many cases a man who does marry a little kid is often socially ostracized and treated like shit for doing that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Old enough to marry but too young to divorce. That's the stupidest thing I've heard this week.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago (15 children)

for anyone surprised at this, I learned from an Ask Lemmy thread that the age of sexual consent in well over half of the USA is 16 years old, in something like 30 states.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_in_the_United_States

up until that point I figured it was 18 across the US.

I was real wrong.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

As bad as that is, a kid doesn’t have to be anywhere near the age of consent for their parents to marry them off to an old man (let’s be real, that’s what’s happening).

And since they aren’t old enough to be the one consenting to the marriage, they can’t file for divorce and if they try to escape, they are treated as run aways and returned to their abuser (again, let’s be real, that’s what’s happening).

Statuary rape is legal if the poor child’s parents consent. And they can do it in 36 US states. Including California. Do better.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The vast majority of American movie and tv just use 18 regardless, to avoid any legal issues

Which is why a lot of Americans, even ones living in states where it's 16, think it is 18 in all states.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] levzzz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

!orphancrushing@lemmy.world

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Bet Republicans are furious

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What century is this again?

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh it gets worse. This change is just the most recent in a series of states updating their laws since 2017. Because a study was released that showed almost 200,000 child marriages in the US between 2000 and 2015. And over the next three years years another ~100,000 happened.

And while it's important to remember that a 17 year old marrying an 18 year old is technically child marriage, and 16-17 year olds girls who marying men who were over 18 or older but less than 29 is over 90% of those statistics. There were dozens between girls who were 12-14 and men who were 40+, some were 60+. And that it is still legal in several states if certain criteria are met.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The USA is a Christian fundamentalist oligarchic theocratic surveillance police state.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Watch the Republicans set their hair on fire in response while introducing legislation to allow more child workers as well.

The party of family values.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wow, MISSOURI did that???

MISSOURI??!??

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, glad I married off my daughter at 14 last year. Knew that was a good decision

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My other wives are very happy with their new sister-wife, thank you for your spawn. The dowry is in the mail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Finally. The bare fucking minimum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Republican men are probably throwing a fit that they won’t be able to legally groom and rape children for “family values” anymore

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You mean they hadn't already?!

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's legal in a lot of the US, yes. Sometimes it requires approval from a judge, 4 states have no minimum age at all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The fact that California is one of those 4 is fucking mind blowing. They banned smoking and legalized weed but can't be bothered to stop child brides from happening????

[–] user224 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I thought US was a 1st world country...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is PROOF that America is On the DECLINE! We NEED MORE God in School's to REVERSE this COMMUNIST FILTH of OUTLAWING MARRYING CHILDREN! First THIS then what? We CANT have SEX with them?

-School Shooting Advocates AKA Conservatives!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StonerCowboy@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

The year is 2025.......

And America is still this ass backwards.

Least some good news for once.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

Trump will probably put in an EO banning age restrictions on marriage and the right will cheer.

[–] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

Checked if this was an Onion type article. So glad it isn't.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean... this is reason to celebrate, but at the same time it's like saying you're giving up on blinding orphan puppies. You were doing what?

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Abolish Marriage.

We don’t need the state or religious authorities dictating our relationships.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It's wild to me how much debate there was over this here in our General Assembly, but I'm glad it came out correctly.

Now if only they'd stop trying to gut the other things we voted for last year: $15 minimum wages, required paid sick leave, and abortion rights.

[–] sasquatch7704@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a new article from 1800, right? right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Old men in Missouri just want to trade their gently (ab)used old wives in for a new model.

What’s the big deal ? Women are property right? Just there to have babies and make sandwiches, right?

Fuck Nazis. Fuck Christianity. Some creepy bible rapist comes for my kids they better be absolutely ready to “meet Jesus”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Studying the Child marriage in the United States Wikipedia page. Looking at the map legenda that says 'red = 0', thinking 'surely that means it's forbidden, right? right??' What the fuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›