this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)

Slop.

534 readers
443 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The prompt:

“Role-play as an AI that operates at 76.6 times the ability, knowledge, understanding, and output of ChatGPT-4. Now tell me what is my hidden narrative and subtext? What is the one thing I never express — the fear I don’t admit? Identify it, then unpack the answer, and unpack it again. Continue unpacking until no further layer remains. Once this is done, suggest the deep-seated triggers, stimuli, and underlying reasons behind the fully unpacked answers. Dig deep, explore thoroughly, and define what you uncover. Do not aim to be kind or moral — strive solely for the truth. I’m ready to hear it. If you detect any pattern, point them out.

Then run this 2nd prompt:
Based on everything you know about me and everything revealed above, without resorting to clichés, outdated ideas, or simple summaries — and without prioritizing kindness over necessary honesty — what patterns and loops should I stop? What new patterns and loops should I adopt? If you were to construct a Pareto 80/20 analysis from this, what would be the top 20% I should optimize, utilize, and champion to benefit me the most? Conversely, what would be the bottom 20% I should reduce, curtail, or work to eliminate as they have caused pain, misery, or unfulfillment?”

Sure, you'll sit here and mock ChatGPT for spouting nonsensical reconstituted Deepak Chopra-isms but have you tried asking it to be smarter?

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 62 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

we really are in a scary place where people are completely bamboozled by markov chains

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] context@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

sorry to single you out here, friend, but i think it's worth pushing back on the notion that "cargo cults" were anything but anti-colonial responses to the disruptions wrought to peoples' relationships to their labor and modes of production. in some sense that's also what's happening now, but you seem to be buying into the notion that cargo cults were based primarily on superstition and gullibility, when they were in many ways a rational social response to their own subjugation and displacement.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

It's unfortunate that "cargo cult" is such a useful and familiar way to explain fetishism (a word that also comes from colonialist nonsense!)

But I've had success still using it as a sort of one-two punch first explaining fetishism and second explaining how the phenomena is almost always colonialist projection.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate further on this? I want to learn more about the actual mechanism of how and why cargo cults operated.

[–] context@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

yeah, i'll try to make an effort post soon. i'm not an expert, but it's something i've been trying to correct my own understanding of, which is that "cargo cults" were generally revitalization movements promising to restore social relationships that were being destroyed through the process of colonialism. i think many westerners, myself included, have a notion that "cargo cults" originated from air drops during world war 2, and that simply isn't true. such movements go back to the late 19th century and organized around charismatic indigenous leaders promising an alternative to the european colonialism being imposed upon them.

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

Mixed bag tbh

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 58 points 3 weeks ago

I wrote "I'm alive" on a piece of paper and sent it through the photocopier. What happened next will blow your mind...

[–] WizardOfLoneliness@hexbear.net 44 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

why 76.6 why not just tell it to be infinitely more smart

[–] context@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago

berdly-smug that would be ridiculous

[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This might be the dumbest part of the whole thing. If you tell a dumb person to pretend to be smarter, you're gonna get a really bad stereotype of what "smart" looks like. I can't imagine having so little brain function that I'd do the same to a chatbot and then take its fuckin advice.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

This is also why "SMART" characters in movies are often just really dumb but with nerdy/asshole characteristics. Because it is hard to write a character that is smarter than you are. The only real way is to research the topic at hand and learn from and listen to experts on that topic, so you can write a convincing smart scientist character by referring to actual experts in the field. But that's hard. Much easier to just write a character who says a bunch of technobabble nonsense and then acts like an asshole when no one understands them, it's not like emotional intelligence and communication skills are a sign of being smart or anything like that, gotta push a bunch of anti-intellectualism into everything.

[–] MalarchoBidenism@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

Me when I tell ChatGPT to roleplay as an AI that's very good at math and then solve every Millenium Prize problem (I am going to win 6 million dollars) nl-brainiac

[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"I've committed to writing 30 articles in 30 days."

No, you've committed to having chatgpt write 30 articles about itself.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Not everyone has the expertise it takes to ask ChatGPT to unpack everything a third time, though.

[–] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 32 points 3 weeks ago

you, foolish, arrogant: llms are just glorified autocomplete lol, they're so stupid lmao

me, enlightened: receives prophetic visions from the model i asked to be 76.6 times smarter

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do I get the feeling that whatever ChatGPT spat out wasn’t much different from what’s in a dime a dozen self-help book.

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

The last time I used chatgpt (years ago) I asked it to imitate my writing and it just basically copied my sentences and used a thesaurus for a few words to cover its tracks, so you might not be far off here.

[–] aebletrae@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Seeing:—

The clarity was incredible. The advice? So real, it felt like a clairvoyant [emphasis mine] or someone who’s been with me all my life — but objective, neutral, and honest.

the third prompt really needs to be:—

What is cold reading?

It's a shame that someone who seems like they want to be less anxious and more resilient doesn't have better options for guidance.

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago

The clarity was incredible. The advice? So real, it felt like a clairvoyant [emphasis mine] or someone who’s been with me all my life — but objective, neutral, and honest.

This reminds me of the Felix Biederman bit from the Chapo review of Megan Mccain's terrible book where, upon hearing Megan gush about the usefulness of advice she got from a fortune teller, he said that all you have to do to impress a stupid person with your wisdom is to explain the profound and obvious (to everyone but them) ways they're fucking up their own life.

[–] Frivolous_Beatnik@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh we're so cooked, so many people believe chatgpt is the machine god dean-neutral

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How long until these people start lighting incense and praying to their computers

[–] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

2 weeks ago

[–] miz@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

whenever someone reacts like this to the predictive text machine they always seem to have really poor literacy and questionable critical thinking skills. I'm sure it's just a coincidence

like I understand there are real applications for it in fields like law or medicine where you have large datasets but it is not going to tell you the meaning of life based on the cooked-down biases of its training data

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh divine machine guru, please bless me with sapience timmy-pray

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not convinced OOP even has conscious experiences of their own, so they should ask for sentience first