this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
463 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

15252 readers
1826 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JATtho@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Oh, this is a good one.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Regarding the alt text, that’s called a bureaucrat

[–] towerful@programming.dev 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you think curiosity without rigor is bad, you should see rigor without curiosity

I hope I typed that right. I couldn't copy the alt text from the source on mobile.
And I was annoyed that XKCD alt text wasn't included with the post, so I thought I would include it to the best of my ability

[–] psud@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago

If you add "m." before XKCD like: https://m.xkcd.com/3101/ you can tap the image to display the alt text and then copy it

[–] four@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

XKCD alt text is always worth!
And it's not always available (like, the well known ones being circulated around social media).

Props to the OP for linking to the image from XKCD (as opposed to rehosting it) and further props for linking the source!

Just missing the delicious alt text (at least for me using jerboa, Firefox and a pixel phone)

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah the alt text is always half the joke with XKCD.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

See, I thought that the most important thing was solutions of ethanol.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess you'd need some proof.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hm, that doesn't sound absolute

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not, but it has some flavor to it. But 100 is a bit much.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We can compromise - 95. That seems like a good number if you really want to proof things right. You want at least 95.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that leaves 5P less. I feel like we need a P closer to 0.

How about if we just define that P=NP?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've never had solutions from ethanol, only problems

It is the cause of, and solution to, all life's problems. :-)

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

As a scientist who has seen too much "that's what the Algorithmen spit out, let's publish it", I can truly feel the comic

[–] rob64@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago