this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
304 points (99.0% liked)

News

30314 readers
3349 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 94 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is no such thing as an "unreviewable" decision. Even if the decision is backed by the law, it can still be reviewed, in order to confirm that it is indeed backed by the law.

Trump is not just arguing that he has the right to do this; he's arguing that there should be no legal review process at all, which is an argument any kinds of checks and balances whatsoever. He's demanding total autocracy.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 17 points 1 day ago

He’s demanding total autocracy

And many are doing what he demands, some because they like autocracy, some because of self interest and some because of hatred against certain groups.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Kinda sad that this comment could be applied to most of his actions.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 121 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When all this is over, every single Trump enabler needs to be disbarred or otherwise have their professional credentials permanently revoked

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How about jailed, at least?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, well, after a review.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Oh sure. Everyone deserves the trial that they didn't wanted to give to others because we are better than them, we WILL give them the rights they denied to others

lol that would be nice

[–] KarlHungus42@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Department of Justice lawyers representing the Trump administration returned to court today to repeat their maximalist argument that the president has the authority to commandeer state National Guards troops and that judges have no authority to second guess him.

"Maximilist" is doing a heavy lift to help the author avoid say "Fascistic."

Here's an image of what the world would look like right now if we listened to all the lawyers who have lawyered for Trump. And I use the term "lawyered" loosely.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What, just the ones that were paid, or . .

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"When the president does it, it's not illegal."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

NIXON'S BAAAAACK

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

.....but they've been reviewing them. Are they switching languages to Klingon? Why would they suddenly be unreviewable?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

They realized they don't actually know how to read.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So he thinks he is advice the laws?