this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
484 points (96.4% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4721 readers
102 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52fighters 117 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've already been born so my odds should be updated.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is actually percent of each population that believes in reincarnation

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 72 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s not zero for Antarctica, just nearly zero. 11 people have been born in Antarctica. Mostly argentinians but also a couple chileans.

[–] zelgo@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Okay and that would still be less than 0.00% which is the significant figures on the chart. They can't just put 0.01.because 11 out 8 billion people were born there.

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They could have put <0.01 but either way there's no real society/culture there to bwgin with. I personally wouldn't have even included it on the map.

I will say if they were included on education stats, they would probably top all global charts.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago

It's a good reminder though that 0.0% doesn't have to equal 0

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And lets not get into the nationality thing there

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

New Zealand’s gone missing again, I’m assuming it’s lumped in with Australia.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No it means there is zero percent chance of New Zealand

[–] Gorge@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago

New Zealand is in stealth mode. We keep it off the maps so trump doesn't know it exists and leaves it alone

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago

It's crazy they did include a bit of Russia near Alaska and also bothered to add the Galapagos (where nobody lives) but omitted NZ

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No chance of being born in New Zealand I see

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

It's more proof it doesn't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Remember everyone: 100.00% does not mean all, and 0.00% does not mean none, just like 50.00% does not mean exactly half. They all are accurate to 0.005% points.

[–] match@pawb.social 19 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

So there's a chance I'll be born in Antarctica?

[–] matti@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You, no. Some other guy, maybe.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 25 points 2 weeks ago

Maps without New Zealand

[–] nevetsg@aussie.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So me being born in Australia was like getting a mythic prize in a loot crate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

With all the scientists and cruises that tour around Antarctica, I am not convinced that the chances of being born there are a flat 0. It might be less than 1% but no way it's 0.

At least 11 babies have been born in Antarctica.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

0.0000001375%!

(This is based solely on roughly how many people exist, not birth rates, because I ain't doing the real math for what is ultimately a rounding error)

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure I would trust any statistics from a map that's missing New Zealand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Do you come from a land of plenty?

Statistically, no.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Technically Antarctica isn't 0. There's a civilian colony and at least one baby has been born there.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 24 points 2 weeks ago

Eh it rounds down at that point

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 23 points 2 weeks ago

11 people were born there. That's a ~0.00000000133649348822 chance. Small but not impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yet Americans act like they're 90% of the world and no one and nothing outside the US matters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think those chances vary a lot based on where your parents live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Y'all probably already knew about the Valeriepieris circle, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I misread this as "Chances of being born in each Connecticut" and while I know humans are fond of naming places after existing places, I'd be surprised if every continent has a place officially named Connecticut

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Antarctica doesn't have one apparently

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

How about chances of being born in the ocean, or even on this planet?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (11 children)

What time frame does this represent?

Births in 2025 might be majority subsaharan Africa.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't believe I used up all my luck for that

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Fellow Antarctican?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Ok, now make this but per land area.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

there are three continents, four if you have to add Australia

don't give me that canal crap either, i will die on this hill

[–] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Continents are mostly a cultural subdivisions, not based on geology, it's pointless to debate about it. Good video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrsxRJdwfM0

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›