this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
106 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

7045 readers
335 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] doctortofu@piefed.social 55 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just a few trillion dollars more bro, I swear bro, I'll make it SO good and profitable bro! Just need a few more trillions, honest! And maybe, like, no more than 70% of all water and electricity in the world diverted to the data centers bro, no more than that! Imagine how awesome it'll be bro, come on, this time it'll work for sure!

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, the earth will roast and people won't have water, but they won't have to fund artists anymore!

[–] Deathgl0be@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Generate images of water that use to exist.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Just put the data center on mars

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 4 points 11 months ago

Just put Altman on mars. Musk too. All the billionaires can go. Right now, no habitats needed

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For real?!? This isn’t the Onion?!?

I’m tired, boss…

[–] other_cat@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

Legit same, I thought for sure this was the Onion.

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

GPT-85 is when we will finally be able to replace human workers, just give us more funding bro

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

Just one more GPT bro I swear this time will be different

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 11 months ago

Consume product! Get excited for next product!

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 months ago

One more lane bro

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not exactly sure, but perhaps people are a wee bit less eager to swallow bullshit from someone who has been shown bullshitting before? Just a thought. ¬¬

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

No.

Exhibit A: current US administration...

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 12 points 11 months ago

this will be the one guys. it won't use up all the power and water in your communities and it won't write completely bugged code. I swear

Altman is such a fucking tool lmao

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

They're speedrunning to GPT-9000 just so they can lay claim to the HAL number.

[–] xia 6 points 11 months ago

That was fast...

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Wasn't it a moderate success? While I dislike (even hate) LLM in general, many people I know loved new GPT5 compared to GPT4.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm one of the moderate fanboys and I love gpt5 and not having to switch models anymore, compared to before. So far, it's pretty good about when to think longer and when to give quick answers.

That being said, I don't use it for anything other than STEM concepts and coding tasks. I have no idea what the complainers use it for.

I did hear that people thought it had less "personality". Funny, I did notice it got more concise in its answers. This was an improvement for me, but I'm using it as a tool, not a friend or therapist or something. To each their own.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

A bit complaint I saw was that it was really bad at choosing when to think long and when to give short answers leading to lots of incorrect and underbaked replies.

[–] potatoguy@potato-guy.space 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, using the corporate version of chatgpt (Microsoft Copilot), it was a huge leap, Gpt 4 was dumb as hell, Gpt 5 is average in intelligence. I hate LLMs, but it makes my unit tests and help me debug the java magic at my job.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you're having success with your use cases, then good. Just be sure to verify the results, and that's key because many people using LLMs aren't looking hard at what they get but just copying it as right. When LLMs fail, they fail gloriously, because they don't understand what they're outputting since they aren't AGI, even though they're sold as such.

[–] potatoguy@potato-guy.space 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I know. I just use it as "from this, I did this, so make the same process for this thing", they statistically only try to guess the next token, so they are only good at these "from this work, do the same thing here". The buggy code that I commit is artisanal, the tests are just copying from other tests.

[–] badmin@lemmy.today -1 points 11 months ago

Funny replies you got.

I don't know if any of them actually is, but it is claimed that GPT5 was tuned for the Indian tech sector, and the model fans replying to you sound like they belong to the target audience 😊