this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
493 points (99.0% liked)

Spooky πŸ‘» Halloween πŸŽƒ Dark πŸ¦‡ Horror πŸ”ͺ Memes

1905 readers
1 users here now

In this /c/, we call home
Everyone hail to the pumpkin song!

All year round!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I think most horror fans enjoy terrible horror movies.

The worst sin is when they're just boring, though.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

Boring is probably the worst thing any movie can be.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, like I find horror movies to be mostly just unintentionally funny, but that doesn’t make them bad to me. I enjoy them like that!

I’m not really a fan of the ultra-realistic gore stuff like Hostel though. I much prefer classics like The Exorcist, the Wicker Man, Hellraiser, Evil Dead, and literally anything with Vincent Price!

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 4 months ago

The terrible movies are fun too!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

If you watched hundreds of hours of movies and you didn't like any of them, you might not be a fan of the genre.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You know what horror movie you should see? Creep, by Patrick Brice, 2014. Do not look any trailer, do not see anything about it. Just go and watch it. It will take only one hour of your time.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I liked it because it was unique. I think Horror benefits from just being a different way to present the story. Barbarian recently did that for me, and anytime a horror movie gets me to say, "Hey, I'd dint expect that," that's a good thing.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Seconded. Don't think the second one captured what the first one did.

Creep is the movie I show people when they say they like terrifying horror movies that are grounded in their premise. I love this movie, and it still unsettles me every time

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I wanted my hour back at the end of it.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

rewind the movie

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As a horror fan, I guess I don't really understand the desire to wade through low-tier films when we live in the age of reviews and online-word of mouth. Every horror film I watch is almost always a great film or better. I sat through maybe 4 or so low quality films a few years back, and realized I should just cut my losses and trust what people say, unless I find some super obscure found-footage Japanese horror flick from the 80's that doesn't even have a translated subtitle track, then I'll take the risk.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago

Those are rookie numbers. I was subbed to Amazon prime for years. You have no idea how bad a bad movie can be and just how many there are.

But honestly, it makes you appreciate the bad movies that put the effort in. You feel like a Klondike gold prospector when you finally find not even a good movie, but a good part in a bad movie. And sure, I'll watch the good movies too but there's barely enough of them for even one streaming service.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago

These are fair points, that I have no real argument with, but I do have a different perspective.

  • Tastes vary widely, especially when you try to start trying to throw a little humor into the horror mix. I genuinely enjoy watching some things others really hate and conversely can't stand to watch some franchises that I know are actually pretty good.
  • I freely admit that I enjoy cheaply made horror and movies that makes big swings and take wild chances. Sometimes that works out. Sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes even the failures open the door to something else. The Alien franchise might have taken a really different direction if James Cameron didn't work on Galaxy of Terror (a low budget mess of a movie that I don't recommend to anyone that isn't seriously into bad movies the way I am). Even though I don't like Galaxy of Terror enough to repeatedly watch it, I'm grateful for the insight.
  • I think the trick really is to find a reviewer(s) whose taste align with yours. For example, I enjoy watch Brandon Tenold's takes on cult movies on YouTube. I don't always bother to find and watch the movies he reviews, but after watching his take I can usually get a good feel for if I'll enjoy it enough to spend the time and effort to find and watch it.
  • My time for movies, shows, and books is not precious and limited. If I start watching or reading something that I'm not into, I'm okay with not finishing it. There's no reason to torture myself over it, I just move on. I don't consider this a waste of time.
[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

They nailed with X (2022), but I think they screw it with their sequels. I know a lot of people that claim that every movie is superior, one by another (Pearl and MaXXXine), the same thing happened with Terrifier, the first movie is awesome, but the sequels.... uggghh.

Edit: M3GAN was funny, but happened the same thing whit the sequel.

Edit 2: My favorite horror movie sequel is Hellraiser II

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just watched the trilogy over the weekend and I've got to disagree almost entirely with you. X is awful, awful, Maxine is okay but barely horror, and Pearl is actually a really great movie

E: same thing with Terrifier. 1 is forgettable, 3 is masturbatory, but 2 is phenomenal

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Hellraiser II is a fantastic movie!

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

X was awesome, Pearl was alright, but I couldn't even finish Maxxxine.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

I personally would flip that. X is meh, pearl is fantastic, but Maxxxine isn't great.

Honestly, X is better after watching Pearl, but I still prefer the prequel.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There's been a recent resurgence in good horror

Barbarian was fantastic

So was Together, just watched it for date night last weekend.

I was going to check out Good Boy next, it looked interesting

[–] Gremour@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I liked Weapons (2025), also by Zach Cregger.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago

Hereditary and Midsommar are excellent films as well

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

A friend recommended this one to me. I need to check it out.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Weapons fell off so hard once the >!aunt!< got introduced.

So much mystery was built up for it to be >!one weird lady with a voodoo tree!<.

And the narration in the first minute makes no sense after finishing the movie.

[–] Opal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Do spoiler tags not work the same on lemmy?

[–] Gremour@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Agree.

Still, story resolution was smoother, than, for example, in Hereditary, where tension was masterfully built (and to a higher degree), but last few minutes left me with a sense of unfinishedness.

Anyway, both are great hororr movies.

[–] saintash72@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just since 2020

Evil Dead Rise

Nope

Barbarian

Longlegs

The Substance

The Heretic

When Evil Lurks

Smile

Smile 2

Sinners

Talk to Me

Prey

Godzilla Minus One

The Invisible Man

Nosferatu

The Menu

Color Out of Space

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This really depends on what type of horror fan you are. Some people enjoy the "so bad, it's good" category. Personally, I dislike the really suspenseful and depressing ones that get really high critical ratings because they triggery anxiety or depression, but I'll laugh through gore and excellent practical effects. I also enjoy ghost stories like The Haunting of Bly Manor.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Myself I don't mind some gore but I don't like anything too explicit. "Those" horror films will never be films I'll watch, ever. That being said I really, really love legitimately scary movies, of which there are few, and go ga ga over anything that does cosmic horror right (which is almost unheard of but the existence of annihilation makes me hopeful for the future).

[–] TimeChild@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Just finished Bring Her Back. Pretty top notch, imo. Same directors did Talk To Me which was great. Weapons was enjoyable, but not in my top 10 of last 15 years, give or take.

I feel like we’ve been in a horror movie golden age for a bit. It will likely sputter out soo . A lot of them seem to be hitting the same vibe/style, so getting overdone feeling.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

The true horror.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Horror movie hit or miss ratio is perfectly fine in my experience? Is this an issue people face? Y'all need a better way of deciding upon a movie then lol

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah i wouldn't say its any worse than any other genre nowadays

Lotsa slop out there

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 4 months ago

Horror movies as a genre includes a large portion of direct to video/direct to streaming lower budget films. If we look at action movies and include all the Stephen Segal movies, or romance movies and include all the shlocky Hallmark stuff, or sci fi movies and include all the low budget crap like the Asylum puts out the ratios for those genres are pretty awful too.

Horror just happens to be one of the few that include non-theater releases in what people tend to think of when discussung the genre because of being excluded from theaters for so long. Comic and superhero movies had a similar begatuve popular opinion because of how bad most of them were before the 2000s.

90% of anything tends to be crap and always has been.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I saw The Monkey recently, and I feel it fits the bill here a bit. It's weird, it's cheesy at times, it's got a very eclectic choice of scares and whatnot. It's not serious, at all. But it's also not at all a bad movie, it's got a very respectable 77 on the tomatometer, a source I used to trust implicitly, despite having gone to shit probably five or more years ago at this point.

I think that horror lets itself benefit from some cheese in a way that no other genre can benefit from, and in there we get the whole "bad movie" vibe sometimes. I'm not remotely a massive horror fan, because I've known some and my fandom doesn't hold a candle to theirs, but I enjoy the genre, and it's a very dense genre, with so many ways to tell what is ostensibly the same story: something to "scare" the viewer.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Just watched Sinners.

It was awful.

1.5+ hours of largely unnecessary back story leadup for maybe 25 minutes of actual vampire survival content. Horror movies aren't supposed to be 2.5 hours long.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sinners wasn't a horror movie though. It was a movie that happened to include some horror elements.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I mean it's a movie about people surviving the night against a vampire attack.

It's like From Dusk Till Dawn. Sure there's some action and some humor, but it's a horror movie. Sinners is a horror movie, despite having some action and drama.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It is a movie about two brothers opening a black owned business in the racist south and a vampire happens to show up.

What you call unnecessary backstreet is the main movie.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I dunno, I hadn't heard of it, looked it up on Google, and it specifically and only says horror. Not a horror comedy or anything. But I haven't seen it so I dunno.

Movies are trending toward being longer now though, genre be damned. I remember I used to think, damn, movies are too short. And now I find myself more often saying, damn, movies are too long.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tatann@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Aliens is 2h37 (director's cut) and you don't see the first xenomorph until 1h30 in (not counting facehugger)

Ok it's horror scifi but still

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

My filter is usually age. There has been a massive glut of shitty horror in the past 20 years as it's become cheaper and easier to make and distribute independent film.

I tend to look at the 70s and 80s for things have stood the test of time in terms of favorability. Letterboxd is a great resource for that, especially obscure stuff. I'm sure there is plenty of great contemporary horror but I'll stick to things that are recommended to me.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Me, who hates "good" horror movies and loves monsters, kaiju, slashers, and otherwise B movies: Thumb.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

I let other people watch the terrible stuff so I don’t have to