this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
489 points (99.4% liked)

movies

2548 readers
600 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 106 points 1 month ago

To bad the government is fully compromised.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I for one thing the merger is a great idea. Why shouldn't the company famous for cancelling shows after one season merge with the company famous for burying completed movies for a tax write-off?

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I hate this deal but I am hoping Harry Potter gets cancelled after one season

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Regardless of what JK Rowling is Harry Potter is a international sensation. It's insane that they're trying to remake it when it's what less than 20 years old.

There's plenty of good IP out there why don't they make something of that.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

She's remaking it so she can cut the cast out of the profits. Her three wayward children are getting residuals. And I think Rupert just gives all his directly to trans charities.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not that insane considering the target audience are children and teenagers. People who are 14 years old now weren't even born yet by the time Deathly Hallows part 2 came out, and I bet they'd rather watch a remake than their parent's old DVDs.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People who are 14 now need to be told that Harry Potter is just that racist old grandma's uncool neoliberalism wank.

Teens who are into Harry Potter should be treated the same way we treat teens who are into Atlas Shrugged

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Train them to run for Congress?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh no, netflix likes licences to print money just like any other corp.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe, but the combination of backlash against Rowling herself with the fact that it's being remade so soon, which may create a "this isn't my Harry Potter" type effect, may mean this isn't as successful as they're hoping.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I mean maybe Netflix will add those completed movies.

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean the alternative was paramount buys them...which is worse since the ellisons are pretty far right.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago

Such a cool timeline where the options are a consolidation merger that eliminates competition and creates an unfair advantage, destroying jobs, enriching the wealthy, or the same thing but with Larry Ellison who will obviously do it with a hard right wing slant (as opposed to the other option just quietly doing that)

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Assuming that no merger is not an option, I guess?

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Considering wb put the company up for sale, yes that seems unlikely.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thats why this regime is blessing it, of course.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Don't forget the incoming bribes!

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, I get it but the only people bidding on WBD was Skydance (Ellison). The options were Skydance, Disney, a vulture fund, or Netflix. That's probably why Netflix even decided to bid. Nobody wanted WBD.

Consolidation should have never been allowed, but now that the beast that is Disney exists, there is very little argument that could succeed against the WBD purchase.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

ITS SKYDANCE/ and the saudis.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This will make them too big to fail. Everyone can RELAX now.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Relax. Don't do it, when you wanna suck it to it:

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

I wonder if we will at least publicly name the folks who proposed this clearly illegal merger? Just for the record?

[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

The worst part is that WB owns HBO which is probably one of few which didn’t transformed into shit. I wish they could buyout themselves

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I myself am looking forward to the day when Buy n Large takes over every aspect of our lives.

Capitalism is like a long warm hug by an elephant. Eventually the elephant goes to sleep on you.

Remember kids: "we all support this system together".

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

not if we stop bnl from doing so.

[–] philipsdirk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

All you need, and so much more

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Antitrust. How quaint.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Wish granted, the Trump administration blocks the deal with Netflix only so that Larry Ellison can have it instead.

There's really no win in this situation.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

"Antitrust is woke!"


Donny the Destroyer

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look at the writers guild of America pretending they don't live in a fascist dictatorship where nothing matters but profits. How quaint.

The chances of this getting blocked under antitrust laws is roughly equivalent to me hitting oil in my back garden.

[–] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

No, they totally know that. We all know that. And I agree that the chances of antitrust law being used for its stated purpose here is low. Do you think they shouldn't have released this statement?

Why do you disdain people suffering under capitalism?

[–] QuietGenesis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its only indie, foreign, and old films for me from here on out. I'm done with all the corporate slop.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hold on to your hat, they are going to reboot all of your favorite classic films... And Chris Pratt will star in ALL OF THEM...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

He's so cool.

[–] Srootus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Does this mean Netflix own all the Warner music stuff too?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who did they want to buy it?

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Ideally, no one at all.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bring it on! Things must get a lot worse before they're going to get better.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Bold of you to believe that things are going to get better.