this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
894 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

20741 readers
3043 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 148 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Here’s a link to a ChatGPT-generated article on why horses are actually reptiles”

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 98 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As soon as I see someone start a sentence with: "So I asked ChatGPT," I know I can basically disregard whatever it is they're about to say.

[–] ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I though the whole thing was just a meme, but literally I was arguing with a mate of mine about the state of piracy in my contry and whether or not it was illegal to consume pirated media.

I searched found a post on reddit which linked me to one of my country laws official documents. I showed him the document and phrasing on the law that clearly stated it was only illegal to share/profit from pirated content.

My guy just hited me with "yeah, yeah . . . now ask chatgpt".

Fortunately it agreed with the current law, but like what the hell the I just showed u the official thing.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 week ago

You shouldn't entertain such a request BUT considering how aggressively these models try to agree with you you can hugely bias the response kinda however you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 8 points 1 week ago

You can do that long before that. Just don't engage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

There are many reasons why horses are legally reptiles including egg laying, accounting, and sun bathing. If you want I can make an anime drawing of a horse lizard.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 104 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There was a thread about this not long ago.

A MAGat posted a meme of a riot and claimed it was in Portland.

People pointed out that the picture was actually a Right wing riot in a different place.

The MAGat responded that it didn't matter, because it was a meme, not intended to be taken factually.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Yeah. This is something I keep realizing.

So many people simply seek to 'support' their tribe/idols. Scientific debate isn't the point; loyalty and conformity is.

It’s a feature of a lot of religious culture. And, in an oddly similar way, influencer culture.

And there is absolutely nothing you can do about it unless there's a really huge personal connection/issue.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

"Yes but it could be true! That's the point!!"

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This makes me so glad that Lemmy exists. Not only is it a great Reddit alternative, but there are infinitely more real and reasonable people here.

Nobody knows everything and we've all been exposed to propaganda at some point. It's fantastic that there's a place online where we can hold civil discussions and nicely fact check each other.

I've been fact checked a few times and it was great. On reddit it would have just been insults or propaganda from the other side. Let's keep this going! ❤️

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right…all these calm, open-minded, and delightfully reasonable people to chat with here.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago

I was gonna say... I like Lemmy overall but there are many, many reply guys on here. 😅

[–] SourDrink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Happy Cake Day!

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Lemmy also has the only Fox News worth a damn

!foxnews@lemmy.sdf.org

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I've still had some people correct me in nasty ways, and even be incorrect in their call outs. Not quite as often as Reddit, but it's certainly far from rare here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Worse yet, you read their article, and it doesn't actually support their argument at all. The headline just kind of vaguely implies support.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reading the article is for libtards, the headline is all I need!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Thats why debate culture doesn't work. The truth is, the type on the right doesn't even care if they're wrong. You could give them a thousand things proving them wrong and they won't even read them.

You could convince a friend maybe but this requires a huge amount of trust and good faith on both sides.

However, ridicule does work because no one wants to join society's punching bag. An example of this would include foot binding in China where the upper classes sent their children off to foreign universities who mocked relentlessly for being from the foot binding country. I would recommend the book "the honor code: how moral revolutions happen" for more examples. It's a fantastic, easily accessible and short modern philosophy book by who I consider to be the greatest living philosopher (Kwame Anthony Appiah).

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

It’s comical how they are “facts over feelings” but would never read a study or consult with someone with actual expertise that isn’t working for a right wing think tank owned by a billionaire.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

probing them wrong

Always ask for consent first though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Thats why debate culture doesn't work. The truth is, the type on the right doesn't even care if they're wrong. You could give them a thousand things proving them wrong and they won't even read them.

Can confirm.

No amount of debate stopped Charlie Kirk's racist spiel and bullshit.

But one thing did stop him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Devial@discuss.online 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon will knock over all the pieces, crap on the board and then strut around like it won anyway

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's why you're not really arguing with the idiot: you're showing everyone else the idiot is wrong. Different perspective to same activity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Isn't it bots and literal children 90% the time anyway?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The real problem is that "actual scientific journal" 's quality control is shit too.

There are no actually real standards on how to write a paper, or which citation style to use. Sources aren't hyperlinked, if the source isn't machine readable or just a book, that's just an "eh, oopsie, go read it then". There are no automatic setups that check for AI use, corruption and "cooperation" between companies or other "public benefit organizations", study conducting bodies and potentially favorable outcomes.

If you look at any research institute or university, they will brag front and center about who much tradition they have, but they're real quiet about how many studies they're publishing and how many of them get reproduced. And don't get me started on the whole publishing industry that somehow everyone has to pay into for everything and the people and institutions that actually do the work don't see a dollar of the profits that those companies rake in.

That doesn't mean that there aren't relatively even worse sources. That is definitely the case. But it's very much not a "just believe the scientists" either.


Way too serious rant for a comic over.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago

I mean, it's a very large dependency on which journals, how well cited they are etc...

I mean yes there's absolutely problems, but it doesn't make much sense when we are comparing to basically completely unsourced arguements from complete and total laymen. That's basically in the category of calling out Obama did some unethical things as president... in a discussion about trump. Yes 100% agreed with the premise, but also have to say they aren't even in the same league.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The real problem is that “actual scientific journal” 's quality control is shit too.

Good thing they referred to a meta-analysis, which is near the top of the hierarchy of evidence. Most of the scientific research articles nowadays are hyperlinked. They aren't appeals to authority: the entire purpose of the article is to present their work, data, & findings (ie, evidence).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is ridiculous Studies are always behind a paywall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Eristic, bad-faith debater. They only care about winning. They don’t care how. They aren’t there to change their minds. It’s not a discussion, it‘s a fight; and they‘ll sell their souls, their dignity, and reality, to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I bet you feel pretty foolish now.

Yes, but not for the reasons you think.


(btw, this is the first time I'm seeing someone copying xkcd's absence of style)

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Jokes on her now the oligarchs are consolidating all media and defunding real scientific studies

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Love the detail with the coffee cup vs the beer 😂

[–] Hell_nah_brother@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The meme is factually incorrect: it’s worse than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›