this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
225 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

43957 readers
708 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla Corporation has named its new CEO in replacing interim CEO Laura Chambers.

Anthony Enzor-DeMeo has been named the new CEO of Mozilla Corporation. Anthony Enzor-DeMeo was SVP of Firefox from 2004 to July 2005 and then from July until now was the GM of Firefox at Mozilla. He's written a public message today in his first day serving as the new chief executive for Mozilla.

Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is KDE browser hanging around still? I know apple based their browser off of it.

[–] banause@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We will get Orion-Browser soon which is based on webkit.

However, Servo ist currently what we need to lay our hopes on. Do everything you can to contribute there. From donations over reports to code. Even if it is just spreading the word. It is currently the single most important FLOSS project out there.

https://servo.org/

[–] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

God I can't wait until Servo is viable

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 106 points 1 week ago

Well it was fun while it lasted I guess

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 79 points 1 week ago

Another common mozilla L

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

OK peeps, crowd sourcing time.

What other gecko (or non-webkit) browsers are out there?

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 43 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except that *Fox, *Fennec and *Wolf are downstream to Firefox, so if the main trunk goes shit, they will become outdated soon.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 week ago

You kinda want it to be based on Firefox, as the only other option is chrome. The forks already strip out all the mozilla bullshit, it'll just be more work to strip out all the AI nonsense.

I'm mainly familiar with librewolf, it's not just stripped of nonsense but also hardened by default. Actually so much so that I stayed on Firefox as it was too much effort (so far) to "unharden" all the aspects I didn't want or need.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We'll cross that bridge when and if we come to it. Or rather we won't, but the devs behind these projects will.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

FOSS to thrive needs people who can afford to spend time and energy on it. With the recent enshittification of workers collective power developers have less of both, and the trend is pessimistic.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The answer is, and always has been, unions and strikes.

Do your part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Aren’t these all soft forks of Firefox? What we need is a hard fork with the funding and team capable of sustaining it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jwt@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you want to sidestep firefox, all firefox descendants would eventually pose the same problem. So I think many options others provided are suboptimal in that regard.

I'm keeping my eyes on ladybird: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird https://ladybird.org/

But it still is in its early stages.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not gecko but Ladybird is hopefully around the corner. Github

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I had to switch away because of incompatible websites (Cloudflare hates it) but Pale Moon is still hanging around.

Source available here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ummmmm, what is an AI browser? I mean, other than something I don't want.

Does it browse AI generated content? Does it generate AI web pages for me? Does it just set chatgpt/copilot/grok/gemini as the homepage/default search? Does it use AI to customize content to your language/reading level? Does it flag non-AI content as potentially malicious like an http site?

I'm so lost.

[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

You made me read the Comet browser review, as I did not have the courage to install it myself.

Seems useful if done privately and under supervision:

  • has an AI chat sidebar that can interact with what you're viewing
  • can fill out forms (eg. you can dump unstructured text and have it fill, instead of copying field by field)
  • it can browse the internet for you - you ask it a question and watch it browse pages to find one with an answer
  • it can summarize the currently watched page. Which at first I thought was ridiculous but sometimes you need to get information from shitty bloated articles with 10 paragraphs of introduction

As long as it's optional and done right (eg. It can fill the form but it's me who submits it, and the model is running locally), sounds very useful. Also no reason why it can't be a Firefox addon instead of built in.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It AI's the AIable content that AI hasn't already AI'd.

[–] curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yo dawg, I heard you like AI 😆

load more comments (1 replies)

No, Pleaso no, god no

[–] dinozaur@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

so long as it's optional, local, and private.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

so long as it’s optional, local, and private.

... yes but also

  • open source,
  • open model,
  • all annotations done with proper respect to
    • labor law (ideally verified by 3rd party)
    • IP
  • clear on ecological cost
    • CO2 eq in model card (ideally verified by 3rd party)
    • analogy non technical user can understand

... which makes for a rather limited list.

My own constraints https://fabien.benetou.fr/Content/CollaborationRelyingOnAI recommendations welcomed, both on such rules but also on models that do fit, if any.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry, but it's not going to be. Mozilla set the stage of this when they changed from FOSS to source available.

I made this prediction right when this was announced.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So I'm not ready to burn it all to the ground just yet. Mostly because chromium is still so much worse but also because, at least so far, I can disable that and I understand that "ai is money" for fundraising.

But... anyone have any thoughts on the various forks like waterfox and the other one? I don't mind grabbing the extensions I need on a new install but I DO need a way to be able to send tabs between devices. In theory that is something I can selfhost but I am not aware of a good solution.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That's actually a decent take on it.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea, hopefully downstream browsers can remove that AI garbage.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

They have so far.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I use LibreWolf and Tor. I don't care what Mozilla does. The garbage will be removed from the forks.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

How long can they do they for. Like it or not Mozilla does most of the coding for those browsers. 0

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At what point does removing garbage become so complicated that they just stop merging anything in at all.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I heard that it's hard as hell, but now I can't remember if the dev who said it was from Firefox or Chrome.

I remember stories of Google intentionally making it hard for people to fork the project and maintain updates on it.

Never heard anything like that about Firefox, but doesn't mean they don't.

That will be up to the dev.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can they rename the browser to Fireslop?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 week ago

The article quotes him as saying:

AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off.

No big deal. If it turns out to be unethical it will be switched off in Librewolf.

[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just in time since 2026 we get the alpha of the ladybird browser. This will be a big boost for the new engines currently in development and the popularity of Librewolf.

[–] DownByLaw@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ain’t ladybird the browser with project lead Andreas Kling? Well… I don’t know if I wanna be part of that.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Guess I'm using Links2 now...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›