this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
644 points (98.6% liked)

196

5754 readers
1377 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

I repost this often because it stays true.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

First, it is debated whether he was born to a virgin mother and it is certainly not settled. He was born without sin according to Catholics which is known as the immaculate conception. This is WAY above Jorgan's head.

A computer is virgin? Where in the fuck does this dunce believe this to be true. It is a nonsensical statement.

If Jesus did return he would come back as an AI!? Once again where the fuck does he get this from. Can Jesus come back as a couch and would Vance try and fuck him? Inquiring minds want to know Jorgan.

And then a statement that Jesus could definitely return as AI. I guess this is him trying to convince himself that it could happen. Straight up stupid.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Gop trying to make a god LLM that will tell people whatever they program it tell people. And people will believe it's God.

Like way too many people will absolutely believe it's God.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I think he is onto something. CEOs seem to have so much faith in AI that's it's pretty much a relgion now.

[–] thekerker@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

When did Joe Rogan start podcasting from the engineering set of Star Trek The Original Series?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I feel like the current iteration of Joe Rogan is from the mirror universe. I remember when he was just a pretty chill stoner comedian who literally told people not to listen to him about science or politics because he doesn't actually know shit. Like, he used to be self-aware.

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is totally in line with stoner thoughts

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

how could their thoughts be real if their prayers aren't?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I can guarantee Joe Rogans computer isn't a virgin.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 9 hours ago

Joe believes in ghosts right?

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Remember, proportionally more of your Spotify subscription dollars go directly to him instead of the musical artists you are listening too.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 16 hours ago

People giving Spotify too much fuckin money

[–] Shamber@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

He gots to tell us who's his plug is, that dude smokes som out of this world shit

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Still a moron

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

As I recall Jesus was not born to a virgin but rather a young mother. The Greek word used in the Septuagint was initially correctly translated but the Greek word used changed it’s meaning over time to mean virgin. The author of Mark did not understand this change and asserted she was a virgin because he incorrectly believed the promised Messiah in Issac was supposed to be born to a virgin.

Bart Erman just covered this recently on his “Misquoting Jesus” podcast.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The author of Mark did not understand this

Isn't God the author of the whole Bible? Like isn't that the point? If you accept it's written by fallible men, how can you accept anything written at face value?

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Sounds like another "Jesus Mythicism" or "Copied Osiris" myth that's been debunked 300 times

[–] scala@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The better way to say it is let them believe he was born to a virgin. Which means he got no Y chromosome from a male sperm. So jesus born from two XX chromosomes, was not male, and also not white.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

He was intersex.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Erman is a terrible scholar, for one. The other thing is that, for centuries, the Septuagint was used as the Bible. It wasn’t treated like a translation the way we do. It’s that, for a long time, the Bible was Greek. It had been Hebrew, then it was Greek, then around the 600s or so it was Hebrew again. That later Hebrew Bible is called the Masoretic Text and was the one chosen by Protestants for the Old Testament because, in their thinking, the Hebrew was older than the Greek. But they didn’t really consider the fact that the Masoretic Text is over a thousand years newer than the Septuagint (it being a reconstruction of the Hebrew Bible based on re-translating the Greek with the aid of the Samaritan Pentateuch, etc.). So the Septuagint used the Greek term for “virgin” which is the only reading the gospel writers would have known. The Masoretic Text translates the relevant Isaiah passage with a Hebrew word that means “maiden.” And there’s some argument out there that they did so in opposition to the Christian reading of the passage. There’s a really great book about this entitled When God Spoke Greek.

TL;DR, The “virgin” reading is accurate to the ancient understanding of the Isaiah passage because that was the only one they had at the time. The “maiden” reading is known to us from a Hebrew text that is at least 600 years more recent than the time of Jesus.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

So my instinct to doubt Ehrman was correct

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

The Gospel of HugeNerd 2:99 it's means it is

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

God he's so fucking stupid

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

I listened to him for a few episodes, and eventually said this out loud, then stopped.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 56 points 20 hours ago

We should rename the Dunning-Kruger Effect to the Joe Rogan Experience.

[–] LuckingFurker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 103 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I don't like living in a world where I genuinely cannot tell if this is a real quote

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 51 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, same here. I checked, and he did indeed say this (yt).

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Was just thinking the same thing. Why is Roe Jogan so far beyond parody?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago

This isn't parody btw. He literally said this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

I wish he only said weird silly pothead stuff like this.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Lol I didn't doubt it for a moment. You must be unfamiliar with the depths of Rogan's idiocy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 18 points 18 hours ago

Grifter says outrageous things for clicks and engagement.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

Praise the shareholders!

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 13 points 18 hours ago

So what I'm getting from this is that Joe tried to stick his dick in his computer, got zapped, and decided that meant it was impossible to fuck.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 41 points 23 hours ago

I unvirgined my computer by downloading a lot of fetish porn and hentai onto it.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I mean how could we be the creator of the return of the son of God ?

The real question moving forward is this: can Joe Rogan become sentient ?

[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m so confused how all these “manly men” seeking for lord to submit to.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Because the Right is getting more radical and no longer allows atheists. So they're having to get with the program or be called leftist cucks.

I'm hoping this backfires and scares the normies

[–] frizzo@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This dude got his start by eating bugs and wrestling men in his underwear. If you consider Joe Rogan manly you are ripe for his grift being the only life on earth dumber than him.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What else do you wear while wrestling though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 20 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

I genuinely wanna hear the reasoning if there’s true believers out there buying into this shit.

I mean granted, they did sell em the ol orange carsalesman pdf as president.

Humanity is fucked isn’t it?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

if there’s true believers out there buying into this shit

Leaving Joe Rogan aside, I remember the cases of one Google employee who believed that their AI programs had reached sentience. So, yes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] YoiksAndAway@piefed.zip 6 points 18 hours ago
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"What's more virgin than a computer?"

Um. Yes, Joe. It's takes like these your audience loves you for.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

He's like the broken clock.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

"AI could absolutely return as Jesus" what? AI is already here why would it return?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Imma assume he meant "Jesus could absolutely return as AI"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›